Five years using and still enjoying the M-Files experience
May 16, 2020
Five years using and still enjoying the M-Files experience
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with M‑Files
M-Files is used in our organization as our primary document and content management application. Nearly all departments rely on it heavily for organizing documents, as well as materials related to meetings, projects, programs, and committees. The versatility of M-Files means that we've been able to continue to adapt our business needs and processes to have M-Files automate processes and security permissions. Prior to M-Files, our organization, like many others, relied on the typical shared drives and department folder approach with email attachments to share content. Now we are able to collaborate on content across teams and streamline the organization of meeting content without worry of the current version or who last edited the document. We've also standardized how content is accessed while simultaneously providing users with the ability to customize their interface so they can work according to their preferences.
Pros
- Version control and history tracking on documents.
- Search ability to filter content for a team, creator, or another property.
- Permission control, limit access to documents to read or edit, or only specific workflow states.
- Administrative control to access all content.
- Administrative control to restore deleted content.
- Administrative control to audit and retag content when needed.
- Robust workflow capabilities.
Cons
- Sharing content externally requires organizational efforts involving information governance, risk management, and IT strategies. There are options the administrators need to consider to permit external sharing. External collaboration requires other IT infrastructure solutions to incorporate M-Files. External facing content can be done, but not easily done without first planning workflows and permission configurations.
- Configurations are determined by the customer primarily. The creation of properties and classes are at the discretion of the customer administrator. An organization needs to understand information governance and enlist collaboration with M-Files, IT, Records Management, Risk Management, and Legal. This is not so much a downfall of M-Files, but it is a consideration that embarking in the adoption of an ECM is a significant investment for an organization, both financially and human resources management, but the benefits with best practice configuration will ensure success.
- There are features that are advertised, but further investigation is available with an additional purchase of an add-on. Unfortunately, not entirely unusual in this business
- Positive: Collaborating on documents across teams.
- Positive: Reduction in duplicate documents.
- Positive: Transparency of authorship.
- Positive: Permission restriction on business process workflows.
- Negative: Change management to align the organization with new tools and sunset legacy systems.
- Active Directory
- SQL tables
- Okta
Some of the configurations that we've done for our system have taken years to accomplish just as we had IT employee transitions. With the organization's vision adaptations really require ingenuity to create the best solution for a stable experience. I encourage anyone to reach out to M-Files for advice and demonstrations so this is an easy process as they have available resources and training which I highly endorse as worth the effort to have that open dialogue of what's possible.
The customization ability seemed to be a level above and easy to navigate and available options are constantly being reinvented. We have used OnBase for years and now desire to move away from this option for a number of reasons.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation