Epic Cadence is the company's medical scheduling module.
N/A
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Qualifacts, headquartered in Nashville, is the developer of the CareLogic enterprise electronic health record system. CareLogic provides scheduling, documentation, billing and reporting designed specifically for behavioral health and human services organizations across the United States.
N/A
Pricing
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
CareLogic EHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epic Cadence
CareLogic EHR
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
CareLogic EHR
Features
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
CareLogic EHR
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
4.2
3 Ratings
57% below category average
Claims management
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Coding
00 Ratings
4.92 Ratings
Patient billing
00 Ratings
3.92 Ratings
Financial Reporting
00 Ratings
3.93 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
6.5
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Rule-based scheduling
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Multi-location support
00 Ratings
3.93 Ratings
Calendar interface
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
5.6
6 Ratings
26% below category average
Charting / document management
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Templates
00 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Patient portal
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support
00 Ratings
5.82 Ratings
Fax integration
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Workflow automation
00 Ratings
6.73 Ratings
Customization
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
E-prescribing
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
4.5
6 Ratings
59% below category average
HIPAA compliance
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
Cadence Enterprise Scheduling is particularly useful in a multiple provider, multiple location scenario. It is also quite useful in situations where there are multiple rooms or pieces of equipment that need to be scheduled.
Carelogic EHR, by Qualifacts is the second scheduling software my company has used, and so long as there are no unfortunate changes it will be our last. It is user friendly, meaning that it is easy to train employees in, and is well organized. The simple interface takes out much of the guess work.
The system is simple to use it helps schedulers create appointments and, avoids placing patients in situations where they are scheduled at the same time in different facilities.
It has many reports that can help managers maintain a smooth operation and shows what areas need to improve.
It has a one place for all scheduling information for schedulers to see patient's appointments, especially when patients do not recall where or when their next appointments will be.
The system can be created in such a way that you can control who can make appointments and who can't.
They system when built provides warnings to schedulers helping to minimize many scheduling errors like overbooking.
Questionnaires: EPIC seems to be very stringent on questionnaires and how may can be attached (only 1) on a Cadence level causing us to be quite inventive on how to get questioned answered on only certain visit types. One big stumbling block was the Ebola questionnaire. Currently we have a particular questionnaire for new Phy. Therapy patients which prevents us from adding the Ebola questionnaire to NEW patients. We are still struggling with this.
Patient Itinerates used for multiple appointments: Not very professional looking regardless of how you set up (OP visits, instructions etc: Most practices will not use the itinerary therefore adding dollars to having printing cards with the practice name on them. (the old fashioned way)
Building new DEP records: Wish there was a way to copy entire builds from one DEP to another.
Security": EPIC security is a nightmare to develop for multi faced users. RN that schedule appointments. Many of our practices are small practices that only have 2-3 people (the doc, the RN and the scheduler/biller . This creates the need for everyone to do everything from a scheduling perspective and building this security can become very cumbersome from practice to practice as each is unique.
It is difficult to obtain information from CareLogic for use in customized reports if the user is not familiar with building reports in Pentaho.
Rather than having the capability to transmit electronic prescriptions on its own, CareLogic relies on an external program to do so. Prescribers must exit out of the document they are in so that they can access the external electronic prescription system. This system has an additional cost. It would be nice if it could be an all in one system.
While the company is usually eager to respond to customer needs, something always seems to be broken or need updating in regards to functionality. This may be a function of our agency's location and the unusual needs we have due to our state mandates, but it is tiring to always have to worry about a workaround.
As stated earlier, it seems to be the best out there, from a built perspective as well as a user application. While some practices feel it to be time consuming (Cadence/Prelude) together others who see the whole integration thru the Epicare and Resolute systems love it. From an IT perspective, while sometimes cumbersome to build, the end results are pleasing and satisfying. We can usually accomplish what we set out to do with the practice vision in mind.
The rating of "3" represents CareLogic's quick loading of pages, however, the reports are super slow and there is no progress bar or notification to let you know if a report is running or not. I've let a report run for an hour before only to find out that the interface never registered my click to run the report.
EPIC has been great in their support and communication at all hours. They also openly communicate when an application TS (Technical Support) will be away and who is covering for that person. During standard non working hours - you always know what number and who to call to get resolution to issues that arise at those times
The customer support at Qualifacts is great. When you have an issue you can submit a ticket to support and they're on top of getting things straightened out and always available by phone as well. The struggle with the overall support is it doesn't seem like the needs of the users are heard. When you ask for what should be a simple fix or something that seems the system is missing, it gets labeled an Enhancement Request which is where requests go to pasture.
Use implementation team from EPIC but know what you want and make sure that it=s what you get. You can be easily swayed by lack of knowledge on the application and therefore decisions are made that are not correct and then have to be redone. EPIC including Cadence needs a great understanding of the workflows you currently have and how they will be impacted by your build. We had a great understanding of the existing workflows in the offices, however lack of knowledge on the Cadence IT side, had a large impact on what was delivered as our implementers believed that a standard EPIC workflow would suffice and did not.
Centricity was limited in ability to scale and customize compared to Cadence for our environment. Also the regular updates for Cadence vs. Centricity is where Cadence really shines. Vendor support is also much better with Cadence over Centricity. We also like the robust capability of the reporting module in Cadence over other vendors.
CareLogic is more a affordable that other competitors. CareLogic takes less time to understand and incorporate. I would say that it has its limitations and is not as intuitive. There is a lot of clicking back and forth between functions and can be annoying. There is also sometimes loss of data. If something goes wrong in the program there is no backup- this may be something that can be added, but my company has chosen not to