Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Evoq Content
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Evoq Content is a content management system within the Evoq business suite. Evoq Content is extensible with many modules that add caching, advanced content approval workflow, granular permissions, document management, mobile accessibility of content, web farm support, and an ecommerce engine.N/A
Ibexa DXP
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Ibexa, headquartered in Oslo, helps B2B companies to stay relevant and succeed by transforming traditional sales strategies into frictionless buying experiences, with their eponymous digial experience platform (DXP).
$20,143.81
per year
Laravel PHP Framework
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Laravel is a free, open source web application PHP framework.N/A
Pricing
Evoq ContentIbexa DXPLaravel PHP Framework
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Ibexa Content - Bronze
€ 15,000
per year
Ibexa Experience - Bronze
€ 23,000
per year
Ibexa Content - Silver
€26,000
per year
Ibexa Commerce - Bronze
€ 30,000
per year
Ibexa Content - Gold
€37,000
per year
Ibexa Experience - Silver
€40,000
per year
Ibexa Content - Platinum
€50,000
per year
Ibexa Commerce - Silver
€52,000
per year
Ibexa Experience - Gold
€57,000
per year
Ibexa Commerce - Gold
€74,000
per year
Ibexa Experience - Platinum
€77,000
per year
Ibexa Commerce - Platinum
€100,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Evoq ContentIbexa DXPLaravel PHP Framework
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Evoq ContentIbexa DXPLaravel PHP Framework
Features
Evoq ContentIbexa DXPLaravel PHP Framework
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
10.0
6 Ratings
20% above category average
Ibexa DXP
9.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions10.06 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
10.0
5 Ratings
25% above category average
Ibexa DXP
8.0
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
API10.05 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language10.05 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
10.0
8 Ratings
25% above category average
Ibexa DXP
5.4
1 Ratings
28% below category average
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor10.08 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness10.06 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section10.07 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates10.07 Ratings3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes10.06 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design10.05 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow10.07 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Form generator10.06 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
10.0
7 Ratings
29% above category average
Ibexa DXP
5.6
1 Ratings
18% below category average
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy10.07 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO support10.07 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management10.05 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions10.07 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management10.07 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Evoq ContentIbexa DXPLaravel PHP Framework
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.0 out of 10
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Symfony
Symfony
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Evoq ContentIbexa DXPLaravel PHP Framework
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(12 ratings)
8.1
(7 ratings)
7.7
(17 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.7
(7 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(2 ratings)
7.6
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.4
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Evoq ContentIbexa DXPLaravel PHP Framework
Likelihood to Recommend
DNN
If you just need to implement a website that is dynamic but not real big in Data Processing almost anyone can do so with very limited knowledge as long as you know how to use a Word Processor and your Browser. If you don't have experience with setting up a Server to run a website there are Companies like PowerDNN, Rackspace and WinHost that can help and I recommend them in that order if you are using DNN. If you need a more sophisticated e-commerce website and don't have much experience with Servers, SQL Server etc. then you should find a consultant to help you install and setup not just the DNN Platform but also select the proper Modules to accomplish what you want to do. If you need a highly customized website that is very data intensive and you are not experienced then be sure to save yourself the time and money by finding a qualified Consultant to help you. The beauty of DNN is that it can handle as simple or as complicated of an Application as you need depending on what your needs are and how far you want to take it.
Read full review
Ibexa
I always recommend Ibexa DXP to my fellows. The only scenario that I would not recommend it is if the site is either too small, too simple, or that they simply cannot afford to stand it up properly.
Read full review
Open Source
I would say that Laravel is not a suitable framework for high-frequency, high-volume, real-time interaction or processing millions of records in batch operations. It shines for standard database web applications (CRUD, Admin Panels, etc.) and is a fantastic multi-developer framework.
Read full review
Pros
DNN
  • DNN is a feature-rich, open-source project with a flexible license. This let us use it without licensing costs for custom solutions or as-is with no custom code just plug-in modules.
  • DNN is written in Microsoft .NET C#. This allows our developers and our customers to use their existing skill set to install and maintain the solution.
  • DNN is made for Windows platform, allowing us and our customers to deploy solutions to existing Windows servers or in some cases hosted platforms.
  • DNN integrates with Windows authentication allowing us to deploy intranet solutions and use single sign-on for improved user experience and security.
Read full review
Ibexa
  • Content Taxonomy: Content is managed in a tree. Though taxonomy vs folksonomy is a near-religious debate among professionals, clients seeing the system for the first time just seem to "get it" more often.
  • Content Flexibility: Common content types such as blog posts and articles are available out of the box. However, customizing these and creating new content types is very easy.
  • Developer Friendly: Developers need only a little PHP experience to get started. Of course being an expert doesn't hurt and opens the door for the development of custom modules.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Laravel utilizes the best possible PHP standards and coding practices.
  • Laravel uses many widely-accepted community libraries and builds upon them, rather than re-inventing everything.
  • Laravel has many components available from the community and is extremely easy to build custom components for, either with custom code or by integrating existing third-party PHP libraries.
  • Laravel is flexible enough to power pretty much any kind of application I can imagine.
Read full review
Cons
DNN
  • It can be a bit heavy-handed when it comes to styling. It's sometimes necessary to spend a little extra time to overcome styling issues.
  • Up until version 8 of the core DNN platform, implementing single page applications (SPAs) required extra efforts.
  • It is very difficult to split a site across multiple servers for load balancing
Read full review
Ibexa
  • Limited partners when you compare to other solutions (WordPress, Drupal, etc). It took us a while to find a solid, trusted developer.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Laravel is updated regularly, which is great. However, in order to get the latest features, use the newest 3rd party libraries, have the most current security updates, and ensure that the newest features of PHP are usable, you have to continuously upgrade your Laravel application. This costs time and money, obviously, and if you don't stay on top of the updates you will quickly fall behind. This is the case with any open source software, but it needs to be considered for any team considering using Laravel or any other software.
  • Because of the size of the Laravel community, there are a LOT of 3rd party libraries. Some of these are great, some are less than great. Sometimes it's difficult to evaluate the quality of a library, making it difficult to trust many libraries. Developers need to be cautious and thoughtful when considering using new software.
  • Because of the rapid development of the Laravel framework, the size of the community, and the simplicity of being able to publish content online - it is very easy to find documentation, tutorials, or other "advice" that is not up to date, or that has outdated information.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
DNN
Even though DNN is a good CMS, I have worked with other CMSs which are far more robust at this point, and would not be overly inclined to select DNN unless cost of the product is the most important factor along with staying on .NET. DNN is a whole package so unless the client has a requirement of including authentication, authorization for users, eCommerce, sticking to something simple is a better option.
Read full review
Ibexa
Very happy with current relationship and websites
Read full review
Open Source
Laravel PHP Framework has continued to exceed my expectations. It supported me in the development of a high quality and stable web application that is mission critical for the organization. I cannot imagine wanting to use any other tool for web development. Documentation, unit tests, and numerous integration options make using Laravel PHP Framework a natural choice.
Read full review
Usability
DNN
Evoq proved to be a solid backbone for our property-management portal, handling ≈300 active rental listings without performance hiccups. The page-builder made it straightforward to craft listing templates that surface photo galleries, floor-plan PDFs, and embedded map pins, while role-based workflows let leasing agents edit unit details (price, availability, pet policy) without touching global site settings—a big win for operational control.

For the management side, the platform’s extensibility let us plug in a third-party rent-payment widget and an automated maintenance-ticket form with minimal custom code. Evoq’s built-in analytics have already highlighted which neighborhoods and bedroom counts drive the most traffic, guiding our marketing spend.

Two caveats:


Search & filter logic – Out-of-the-box search was too shallow for renters who expect Zillow-style filtering. We had to commission a custom module for filter chips (price range, amenities, walk score), which added time and cost.
Mobile image optimization – High-resolution gallery images affected load times on 4G; a CDN or Evoq’s Digital Asset Optimizer add-on is advisable.



Overall, Evoq delivers reliable content governance and enough flexibility to support both consumer-facing listings and back-office property-management workflows, provided you budget for advanced search customization and image delivery tuning.
Read full review
Ibexa
It is quite easy to navigate through the backend and also, you can directly work in frontend view. Dynamic content can be created on the fly. Their Landing page features are awesome. You create a page by drag & drop.
Read full review
Open Source
As I mentioned earlier Laravel PHP Framework has lot of in built feature as well as there is vast set of packages available to add the features in your application. It has very large community who can help when you feel stuck somewhere. This is why this rating is justified.
Read full review
Support Rating
DNN
I don't see how it could get any better unless they moved their staff into our offices. You have available to you any type of Support you need or want, both paid and free from thousands of developers and consultants all over the world. You might even find some on Mars if you look hard enough.Also, with all of the available resources available from your Browser you can literally find the answer to any question you have in a matter of minutes.
Read full review
Ibexa
They are directly reachable and help you to deal with other services, e.g. if would like to set up a CDN for China or if you would like to integrate a tool like HubSpot. If there is anything you are missing, they help you to find a workaround until they can deliver such items - like local language versions.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
DNN
Evoq proved to be a solid backbone for our property-management portal, handling ≈300 active rental listings without performance hiccups. The page-builder made it straightforward to craft listing templates that surface photo galleries, floor-plan PDFs, and embedded map pins, while role-based workflows let leasing agents edit unit details (price, availability, pet policy) without touching global site settings—a big win for operational control.

For the management side, the platform’s extensibility let us plug in a third-party rent-payment widget and an automated maintenance-ticket form with minimal custom code. Evoq’s built-in analytics have already highlighted which neighborhoods and bedroom counts drive the most traffic, guiding our marketing spend.

Two caveats:


Search & filter logic – Out-of-the-box search was too shallow for renters who expect Zillow-style filtering. We had to commission a custom module for filter chips (price range, amenities, walk score), which added time and cost.
Mobile image optimization – High-resolution gallery images affected load times on 4G; a CDN or Evoq’s Digital Asset Optimizer add-on is advisable.



Overall, Evoq delivers reliable content governance and enough flexibility to support both consumer-facing listings and back-office property-management workflows, provided you budget for advanced search customization and image delivery tuning.
Read full review
Ibexa
The partner selected makes a significant impact on the usability and experience
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
DNN
Drupal is a highly expensive tool and is not offering anything extraordinary at a high price. If I keep its pricing in account then there should be some extraordinary features but unfortunately, there isn’t anything special about it; rather it was slow in its working. All these things actually forced us to move to Evoq that is just perfect in its working. Its working speed, interface, and UX are so simple that none of our team members find it tough to utilize. It has so many features like content scheduling and rich text edit. It allows easy editing of the text as well, and one can directly add text according to need.
Read full review
Ibexa
eZ Publish isn't as large in community size and number of installations as other content management systems. However, it's just as capable and met our needs:
  • Developers, system administrators, and project manager can all speak the same language during the development and maintenance cycles of a site.
  • End-user training is very straight-forward.
  • Vendor support is available.
  • Client IT departments can access if need (developers/designers/sysadmins).
  • The community is there (forums) and there are solid contributions (extensions) from both the vendor and the community.
Read full review
Open Source
Supporting unit testing is bigger plus point in Laravel than any other framework. Developing with Laravel is much easier. Other frameworks have value in market, but Laravel has taken the lead in popularity among PHP developers in recent years. The large community supports you if you have problems. Using Laravel, integration became easy with third-party libraries, but it was costly too.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
DNN
No answers on this topic
Ibexa
We’ve priced other enterprise products and found Ibexa DXP to be a bit more expensive. However, not enough to dissuade us from staying with the product.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
DNN
No answers on this topic
Ibexa
The partner ecosystem is small. However, we've worked with two Ibexa partners over the last 10 years. They were very skilled. They were great companies. We've interviewed other Ibexa partners in North America. We found them all to be professional with solid resumes.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
DNN
  • DNN have given us the ability to have basic sites for clients up and running in a very short time. This makes the client happy.
  • DNN has taken the trivial, simple tasks of changing text on a page or an image on a page and put it into the hands of the client. They do not have to pay us to do it and that also frees up more time for us to spend on development.
Read full review
Ibexa
  • Common knowledge: By making eZ a core offering, developers, system administrators, and project managers were able to communicate with each other effectively.
  • Training: Due to its content taxonomy, end-user training often went well.
  • Support: In our case, we had Gold support from eZ Publish which saved time and helped with customizations.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Positive: Our delivery time for PHP application is faster than usual.
  • Positive: Developers are happy and they write better code with their usual development tools. No tool-upgrade necessary.
  • Negative: Initial delivery took 6 months extra and had to rewrite project several times.
Read full review
ScreenShots