F5 BIG-IP vs. Zscaler Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 BIG-IP
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
F5 BIG-IP software from Seattle-based F5 Networks is a load balancing and application protection solution suite available on cloud or via virtual editions, on a subscription or perpetual licensing basis.N/A
Zscaler Private Access
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Private Access™ (ZPA) gives users secure access to private apps and OT devices while enabling zero trust connectivity for workloads.N/A
Pricing
F5 BIG-IPZscaler Private Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BIG-IPZscaler Private Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 BIG-IPZscaler Private Access
Considered Both Products
F5 BIG-IP
Chose F5 BIG-IP
zscaler has a tendency to say they are competitive with F5 1 to 1 but when you go through the cost. it immediately stands out that everything is and additional cost per add-on compared to the F5 best backage.
Zscaler Private Access

No answer on this topic

Features
F5 BIG-IPZscaler Private Access
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
F5 BIG-IP
-
Ratings
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
F5 BIG-IP
-
Ratings
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 BIG-IPZscaler Private Access
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.3 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 BIG-IPZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(188 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.6
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(61 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BIG-IPZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
Definitely in larger environments, more mature organizations that obviously have the budget to spend and want best in class. Where it struggles is those organizations that don't have the funding and money to spend on it and need more basic functionality. So I'd say that's smaller customers we've worked with and kind of mid-market. They tend to get scared when they get the quotes. Also we've had some struggles with account team consistency. So for the sales team, just a lot of turnover and a lot of missteps on customer calls.
Read full review
Zscaler
Well Suited: - Work from home scenario - While working with confidential data - While working with financial data - Office intranet Less Suited: - Reduces internet speed - If the user gets a password, can exit/close the app.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • I mean from a basic level, it actually satisfies all the use cases we have, which is basically to have multiple web servers for the front end and then you want that to be equally split across. The traffic comes in from all over the world. We use DRA protection and everything, but then we also internally want to make sure all the servers are being utilized and we provide much more availability across all servers. We just make sure BIG-IP sits in between and handles the traffic accordingly. And it's pretty basic and it comes to drawing traffic. It's pretty easy to configure and set it up and then forget.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Access control for overall organization, follows the ZTNA model.
  • Better speed for remote users compared with legacy remote solutions.
  • Better visibility on ZScaler portal, thus better control from central space.
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • Recently we have been deploying F5 web application firewall and we have started the deployment. We have already moved applications out there, but we are not yet to the point wherein I could comment any positive feedback or any negative feedback because we are still going through it, right. But as far as I'm concerned, I don't see any drawbacks or any shortcomings on the F5 product lineup.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Sometimes the interface crashes and I need to kill it and restart
  • It can unintentionally block some services like dropbox
  • I don't get a notification when I need to re-authenticate
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
So far experience with F5 BIG-IP has been good, but we are only 6 months into the deployment and will depend on how things run over time.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Usability
F5
It's not difficult to understand the parts of application configurations and features. Setting up new virtual servers with multiple profiles, certificates, and nodes is easy for new users through the web interface, which also translates to programability in scripts, DevOps, or other configuration management use-cases. Users from different backgrounds such as networking and infrastructure can use F5 BIG-IP, while users who are familiar with API calls can easily configure objects without needing to understand the platform at all.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
F5
On the occasions when we've had to engage f5 support, they have been great. They have always resolved our issues quickly and been easy to work with and professional. The reason I give them a 10 out of 10, however, is because when we've had issues that have crossed over between the f5 BIG-IP, our Cisco switches, and our Microsoft IIS server the f5 support representatives have been extremely knowledgeable about every product and device involved and have been able to troubleshoot end-to-end without having to engage other vendors.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
F5
implementation is fine
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
F5
That's the one thing that really stood out. It was a lot easier to use from an administrator standpoint, so I think that's the one thing that really made our team decide to go with this product versus another competitor. Just ease of use.
Read full review
Zscaler
Both are good but sometimes relationship and cost is the factor to decide the final vendor.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • F5 BIG-IP has a highly positive impact on the customers. The main impact is on the security of the web applications.
  • F5 BIG-IP provides an easy and safe way to connect employees to assets and applications that reside in an on-premises environment.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Overall positive Impact.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zscaler Private Access Screenshots

Screenshot of how ZPA provides access for all users while minimizing the attack surface, eliminating lateral movement, and stopping zero day threats. A cloud native service, ZPA can be deployed in just hours to replace legacy remote access tools like VPNs and VDIs.