Likelihood to Recommend The service is really well-suited for pretty much any site that is primarily display-driven (that is, mostly GET requests). The network is able to handle massive volumes of traffic and their POPs have spread out pretty much anywhere that it's easy to get them (so basically everywhere but China and Russia). My team witnessed several large-scale attack attempts on some high-profile websites (attacks in the 10s of millions of requests per second) that were mitigated before ever coming back to the actual application; in one case we didn't realize the attack had happened until we looked at the logs the next day. Because it's a cache store option, the default configuration does not cache POST responses, and it can be difficult to set up things like authenticated paywalls as a result.
Read full review Google Cloud CDN is available globally and supports various load balancers available in different regions around the globe, so I find Google Cloud CDN as one of the best choices for CDN as it serves globally and it is really fast, safe, and secure. It might be not suitable for you if you do not have any technical background.
Read full review Pros Very performant and fast -- major companies have drastically reduced page load times with Fastly's edge technology. Support for many types of media, including video. Image add-on makes serving and manipulating images very simple. Read full review The intelligent categorization and management of site content cache in Google Cloud CDN is unique and offers the best results with simple settings. It has powerful servers in all geographical regions of the world and the speed of the site will increase many times for the customer with smart routing. It has AnyCast IP feature and website receives a single global IP address. In this case, the site loads at the same speed worldwide. Read full review Cons WAF is hard to configure. No comprehensive rate limiting without a pricey upgrade. Account access controls are extremely limited. Read full review Unable to use any kind of code to show different content. Absence of cloud workers as provided by Cloudfront, Cloudflare and Akamai. No support for dynamic routing. Read full review Support Rating I didn't have the need to use support from Google when I was either testing or setting up my website. Information was easily found by searching online if I needed to, and the options that I needed to install or enable were there on the setup page. Honestly, I was a former systems administrator so most of this stuff is not challenging for me.
Read full review Alternatives Considered It’s the fastest and most configurable.
Read full review We have limited software developers and don't have the need for a big cloud service provider along with their costs. Google Cloud CDN brings to usr, reliability and brand familiarity. Google Cloud CDN also doesn't bother us with pitches or 1000 emails about the products. We went and signed up for it, without dealing with a pushy salesperson.
Read full review Return on Investment Fastly dramatically reduces load times for clients all over the world thanks to their global system of POPs. Fastly is a cost-effective choice when a highly-performant CDN is required and makes it simple to support data that is quickly invalidated. Read full review Google Cloud CDN has worked great as a tool to provide more reliable and faster interactive web experiences such as with e-learning sites. The product can require additional training costs, even for experienced IT administrators. Overall, ongoing costs can also be prohibitive for organizations with smaller web presences. Read full review ScreenShots