FastPIPE is a construction and estimation software offering from FastEST, Inc.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
FastPIPE
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FastPIPE
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FastPIPE
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Features
FastPIPE
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
8.5
1 Ratings
14% above category average
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
6.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
5.83 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
21% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
4% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.75 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
9% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
9.15 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
23% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
8.85 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.95 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
27% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
16% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.42 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
21% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
FastPIPE
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.0
4 Ratings
23% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
18% below category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.44 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
It's absolutely well suited to anyone needing accurate piping takeoff and laboring estimates, with great reporting and up to date pricing. I love that I didn't need to spend time trying to update the price logs. It's easy to learn, and works well in a large or small environment, and lends itself to more than just estimating, but becomes a good project management tool as well. Fantastic software.
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
FastPIPE was very fast to learn, very straight forward and user-friendly. It's easy to use and teach new interns and project engineers how to quickly takeoff sections to backup change orders or assist in heavy bid load.
It's fantastic at keeping up to date on price changes. I'd get updates often, and they were usually within 2-3% of our discount prices with local vendors. In the few instances it wasn't, FastPIPE was very easy to adjust or factor for project costs.
Is great at being able to pull up reports and graphs and track different materials and labor costs for factoring. We bid on a lot of high rise residential buildings, so we do takeoff by floor. It would give detailed reports per page as opposed to just a lump sum. Very detailed so it was easy to adjust per our project approach.
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
It was a trick or two learning how to upload prints correctly, I think that interface could be a bit easier, but it's already better than most of the competition.
Might be nice to have easier labor factoring, in case we want to pre-load our own instead of MCA time factors for piping labor
It would auto update upon opening occasionally. It's fairly fast, but I prefer to OK that in case I just need to come up with something quickly and don't want to wait.
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
I've used the quote soft piping takeoff as well, and it's just not as easy to use or update. Basic methodology and interaface is similar, but it's more 'clunky' to use, is harder to keep updated and to upload PDF's for takeoff, and it's just not as streamlined or user friendly. Akin to comparing driving a truck to a sports car. The Fast Pipe is really smooth and easy to function in.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
Best impact is time saved. It's so much faster to do bid takeoff and hit the ground running
Being able to 'draw in' on design-build and being able to print my takeoff has been helpful when turning the job over so the field install understands the approach taken to get the job.
Ease of use and learning has made it much more cost effective to bring new people up to speed.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.