TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Figma

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AFigma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.

    $15

    per month per editor

    Qlerify

    Score9.2 out of 10
    Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
    The Qlerify platform bridges silos between business and it, transforming ideas into comprehensive process maps, data models, software designs, and source code, with the goal of accelerating development cycles, reducing errors, and helping developers to deliver high-quality software solutions faster. Qlerify can visualise a complex discussion with many stake holders in real-time and produce actionable blueprints for developers in record-time. Some features of Qlerify: 1. Co…

    $300

    per year per user

    Pricing
    FigmaQlerify
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $144
    per year
    Organization
    $540
    per year
    Starter
    Free
    Basic
    $25
    per month (billed annually) per user
    Pro
    $40
    per month (billed annually) per user
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    per year per user
    Enterprise
    Contact us for pricing
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigmaQlerify
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Qlerify also offers team and project based pricing. Please contact us for more information.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigmaQlerify
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    No answer on this topic
    Qlerify AB
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    204 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    179 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    198 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    99%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    123 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    142 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    FigmaQlerify
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Figma and Qlerify
    Feature
    Figma
    -
    Ratings
    Qlerify
    9.3
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of Figma and Qlerify
    Feature
    Figma
    -
    Ratings
    Qlerify
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Social collaboration tools00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Figma and Qlerify
    Feature
    Figma
    -
    Ratings
    Qlerify
    9.1
    1 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Content management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FigmaQlerify
    Small Businesses
    Proto.io
    Score7 out of 10
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    UXPin
    Score7.9 out of 10
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Marvel
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigmaQlerify
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (209 ratings)
    9.2
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (41 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.1
    (17 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigmaQlerify
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    I would recommend if you need to start from scratch a product UI or any customer journey that you need to implement that requires designing and visualizing different steps to complete a process. I would recommend that any design/UI/UX team brainstorm and make proposals that they can compare and discuss in a visual way.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    Extremely well suited for process development and since it closes the gap between ICT and Business, for software development. It is less appropriate in cases where swimlane type of process map doesn't suit well.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • Figma allows us to create universal content. This means that if multiple designers want to re-use a piece of content, and if everyone's content should be dynamically updated from time to time, we can easily accomplish this by turning design elements into a universal instance. Then, if an update is needed, we can push the change out to all assets at once. It's very efficient and ensures we're all updating content accordingly.
    • Figma also allows us to set parameters for the company's brand guide and share them across various designers. This way, we can easily pull from approved brand fonts, colors, and more, which allows our assets to remain unified across multiple touchpoints.
    • Figma also allowed us to create and install our own plugin, which we use to export every slide we have in a frame at one time, versus the default export feature, which limits you to one slice at a time. This is particularly useful for us when we're working on email templates, since we tend to have a ton of slices in any given series.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    • Streamlined UI
    • Real-time collaboration
    • Jira integration
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • It will be great if Figma will consider having the Pages where interactions can be stitched together among the Pages and not just one page with so many Frames to create the stand-alone clickable prototype that can be used to simulate the intended UX
    • Bring back the Inspect Mode tab right on the right-side panel of the main workspace instead of hiding behind the Dev Mode.
    • Figma Slides feature could be improved quite a bit more in order to be easier to assemble slides into a presentation deck and having pre-built templates for slides can be useful too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    • We would have like to known about them a bit earlier.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Figma
    Figma is a pretty cool tool in many areas. My team almost uses it on daily basis, such as, brainstorming on product/design topics, discussing prototypes created by designers. We even use it for retrospectives, which is super convenient and naturally keeps records of what the team discusses every month. Furthermore, I do see the potential of the product - currently we mainly use it for design topics, but it seems it is also a good fit for tech diagrams, which we probably will explore further in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Figma
    There's a bit of a learning curve, but generally I think it's both more powerful and intuitive that other UX design tools. Most of what I need to do as a designer can be done in this platform, from basic wireframes to creating a design system, to creating pixel perfect designs, to prototyping to dev handoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Figma
    The only regret I have is, its not available when there is no internet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Figma
    I think its great, As there are many other software or systems which can be integrated with it as plugins or API's
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Figma
    I haven't used their support lately but in the past, they had a chat that I used often. They often responded in a few hours and were able to give a satisfactory solution. I would imagine it's less personal now but the community has expanded drastically so there are more resources out there to self serve with a bit of Google magic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Figma
    In-person training has its own benefits - 1. It helps in resolving queries then and there during the training. 2. I find classroom or in-person training more interactive. 3. Classroom or in-person training could be more practical in nature where participants can have an hands on experience with tools and clarify their doubts with the trainer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Figma
    Online training has its own merits and demerits - 1. Sometimes we may face issues with connectivity or the training content 2. The way training is being delivered becomes very important because not everyone is comfortable taking online training and learning by themselves. 3. With the advancement of technology online training has become popular but there is a segment of people who still prefer class-room training over online one.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    Miro is more user-friendly than Figma, but is less robust in terms of web prototyping and graphic design. While Figma isn't made to be used as a design tool, our team has taken to using it as such because it's richer in functions and personalizations compared to Miro and Figma.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    I haven't officially evaluated other process mapping tools. I have however used many tool during the past 30 years. Qlerify is first I am excited about.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Figma
    I think this is great and as I mentioned at ADP we use Figma extensively whether by designers, researchers or content writers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • Allows us to get funding for further phases of the project (which is uncountable)
    • Well, it lets us show off when needed due to well suited UI-oriented character
    • Easily approachable by anyone (browser use)
    • User friendly interface
    • More advanced cooperation requires some of the users to have a license
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    • It has enabled me to achieve results faster
    • Qlerify helps find better solutions
    • Qlerify has enabled results we have not achieved with other tools
    • Qlerify's collaboration features improve team and management buy-in
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Qlerify Screenshots

    Screenshot of a simple order flow and system requirements for ordering at a restaurant.Screenshot of the customer onboarding process at a fintech startup.Screenshot of the Product Information Management Process for a retailer.Screenshot of an example of a data model visualization (Star Schema).Screenshot of an example of a high-level software design visualizaton inspired by Event Storming and Domain Driven Design.