Fing Desktop vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fing Desktop
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
PRTG
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
PRTG Network Monitor is the flagship offering from German software company Paessler, for monitoring local and wide area networks (LANs & WANs), servers, websites, apps, and more.
$1,750
perpetual license
Pricing
Fing DesktopPRTG Network Monitor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
PRTG 500
1,750
perpetual license
PRTG 1,000
3,200
perpetual license
PRTG 2,500
6,500
perpetual license
PRTG 5,000
11,500
perpetual license
PRTG XL 1
15,500
perpetual license
PRTG Enterprise
Custom Pricing
subscription license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fing DesktopPRTG
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fing DesktopPRTG Network Monitor
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Fing DesktopPRTG Network Monitor
Network Performance Monitoring
Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Fing Desktop
-
Ratings
PRTG Network Monitor
8.1
61 Ratings
3% below category average
Automated network device discovery00 Ratings9.054 Ratings
Network monitoring00 Ratings9.360 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation00 Ratings8.051 Ratings
Alerts00 Ratings8.761 Ratings
Network capacity planning00 Ratings7.243 Ratings
Packet capture analysis00 Ratings6.231 Ratings
Network mapping00 Ratings7.943 Ratings
Customizable reports00 Ratings7.852 Ratings
Wireless infrastructure monitoring00 Ratings7.743 Ratings
Hardware health monitoring00 Ratings8.958 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Fing DesktopPRTG Network Monitor
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Intermapper
Intermapper
Score 8.5 out of 10
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
Score 7.7 out of 10
Nmap
Nmap
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fing DesktopPRTG Network Monitor
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(61 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(18 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fing DesktopPRTG Network Monitor
Likelihood to Recommend
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
PRTG is well suited for networks of all sizes, however it can be a bit cost-prohibitive when needing to monitor slightly more than their no-cost tier offers, or if you need to monitor roughly have of the amount of devices offered in their first paid tier. That said, it scales and works well in our small network of 300+ devices. It would likely excel in larger enterprise/data-center type of networks as well. It also works very well for remote-site monitoring, which reduces our need for on-site IT staff at our other location.
Read full review
Pros
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
  • Very, very configurable. You can create all kinds of monitors for all kinds of things. Plus it has loads of suggestions out of the box. It can get complicated but monitoring is complicated. Pretty decent interface and good support - active community.
  • I really liked how easy it was to add alerts by SMS. So easy to setup.
  • I like their sizing models (for purchase). We're actually small enough that we are free. But it's not free as in stripped down - it's free because we don't use many "sensors" and don't honestly have the need.
Read full review
Cons
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
  • Licensing on a per entity basis can be cumbersome for devices which have a ton of monitoring points like network switches\routers. Each sensor may count against a license, which could be a lot of you were monitoring every TX\RX of an SFP for example
  • A better method to easily template\copy monitors across devices
  • The navigation in the web GUI could be a little more straightforward in terms of the hierarchy
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
We love PRTG Network Monitor. We think that the product could be better with new funtionalities but today we are facinating with it.
Read full review
Usability
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
The tool is very intuitive to use and it is Windows-based (everybody knows how to use Windows) so it's easy to get into. Every time is setup in a hierarchy so if you have a good initial hierarchy design, it will really reduce administrative effort down the road.
Read full review
Support Rating
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
PRTG does everything we need it to do and more. Ease of use, ease of management and maintenance and clarity of monitoring of hundreds of different types of device and service gives this a large advantage over other products on the market that I have tried. I would definitely recommend it to anyone who needs a network monitoring product in their environment and even to people who don't know they need a solution yet!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
It's very important that de project's teams have different member of the TI. We have learned too late the importa of Security Analyst at the design architecture moment. We have to rebuild part of the implementation for made this big mistake.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
I have deployed and tested three products for evaluation I found [PRTG Network Monitor] very easy to deploy, the deployment literally took not more than one hour including basic configuration and network discovery. After deployment few configuration changes and creation of maps, reports and little tweaking is required. [Then] it would go through its process of recommendation that took some time to complete, while [on] other hand other software's took lot of time to install and configure. And features were also missing, which resulted in decision in favor of [PRTG Network Monitor].
Read full review
Return on Investment
Fing
No answers on this topic
Paessler
  • The ability to analyze multiple pieces of information in one place, especially with historical data, has saved our IT department time and headaches. It would be so much more difficult to trace an issue without PRTG, just relying on event logs and an open task manager window.
  • The cost is not cheap, so it's an expense that hits the bottom line like everything else. Figure in hardware costs as well, ideally a server outside of your main environment.
  • I keep saying this, but the historical data piece is worth so much. There's really no good way to collect all of that information in one place without something like PRTG. And that definitely saves time and money in the long run.
Read full review
ScreenShots