FloQast vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FloQast
Score 8.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
FloQastOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FloQastOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FloQastOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Considered Both Products
FloQast
Chose FloQast
I have used Blackline at a previous job. It was also a useful tool, but I find FloQast more modern and user-friendly. FloQast has an updated interface and was a lot smoother to navigate that Blackline. While FloQast could improve in certain areas, it is definitely a step up …
Chose FloQast
Blackline felt like a no frills version and didn’t offer as many additional features. It also didn’t feel like the right fit for size.
Chose FloQast
FloQast offers more capabilities and a better user interface. Everything is centralized in one location and can be seen from an overall view. Being able to navigate throughout each period and finding whatever you need to find is convenient on FloQast as well. This is essential …
Chose FloQast
FloQast has a more robust preparer and reviewer signoff
Chose FloQast
Three of the main reasons we selected FloQast were the flexibility in the use of the software, the company's ongoing innovation, and the fact that our information stays on our SharePoint site, rather than on the audit software's server.
Chose FloQast
FloQast is easier to implement and more cost effective but not as robust or capable of a product.
Chose FloQast
I like FloQast a lot better, it has input with NetSuite that I think is easy to understand. We use Workiva for quarterly financial reporting, and might be useful to see what FloQast has to offer when it comes to that to prevent us from having to use another software
Chose FloQast
First time in industry so I've not used other similar tools.
Chose FloQast
It is cost effective and also the team from FloQast is very much supportive and are super active when we raise any ticket they resolve the issue as soon as possible. It is also user friendly like the other tools are complicate to set up and to understand but FloQast is easy to …
Chose FloQast
I used Blackline at my previous job. Now I use FloQast at my current job. FloQast is, in my opinion, much easier to use than Blackline and the looks and feels of the website are more user friendly and visually pleasing. Blackline seemed like a separate system and was not …
Chose FloQast
Middle market approach that was a better fit for my company.
Chose FloQast
I used BlackLine a while ago with a different company and only for 3 months or so. From what I recall, it was fairly similar in functionality and service offering to what FQ offers. That was a good while ago, but I do like the layout and functionality in FQ. It didn't take long …
Chose FloQast
that was all manual, this keeps things in one central place and automatically syncs with our ERP
Chose FloQast
We started with BlackLine and after a year and limited adoption across the accounting team, changed to FloQast. We had numerous reasons, including difficulty in working with the BlackLine standard reconciliation, time needed to complete the set up for automatic reconciliation …
Chose FloQast
We use Netsuite for our main GL and reporting ERP. Blackline was much more expensive and we went with FloQast.
Chose FloQast
Having FloQast automatically pulls updates from excel files saved in our shared folders is key instead of having to upload new files as we've done in the past with other comparable products
Chose FloQast
At the time we picked FloQast, they were the most cost effective and easiest tool to use. Fast forward a little bit, and Numeric has come to market. I really lie Numeric to be honest and feel that their pricing is better and for that lower pricing, they include more …
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FloQast compared to BlackLine.
Chose FloQast
Since it connects to our accounting software it has made the closing process much better than any other tools.
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FQ compared to BL. Our team was up in a matter of days or so it felt! Even if you didn't get properly trained in FQ, you could easily figure it out on your own, which was nice, especially for a large team.
Chose FloQast
We found that FloQast fit well into our existing close process and made it much more efficient. Other rooms, such as Blackline, required a longer and more costly implementation. It also required the use of their reconciliation formats. We did not see the value in that …
Chose FloQast
I used Blackline many years ago but found it to be a waste of time. I didn't like being required to use the Blackline format for reconciliations. The one size fits all mentality never quite works out when it comes to accounting - every business does things a little differently. …
Chose FloQast
Netgain has a product called NetClose which we've considered but ultimately went with FloQast because of simplicity and ease of use. The other product was more technical and hands on.
Chose FloQast
FloQast has a strong brand, offers excellent customer service, has a strong core product, and continues to improve and provide additional value to its customers.
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Anaplan and OneStream
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle EPM did a fabulous job in our webinars and focused demos.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Hyperion System 11, Blackline, Coupa, PeopleSoft, Oracle HCM
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Cloud EPM is the more useful application. It also provides more functions and possibilities.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
It is a great product for Dashboarding and story telling. It is adding value to the Corporate Finance and Data Governance Teams when used together with EPM Cloud.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Cloud EPM is the more useful application. It also provides more functions and possibilities.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
EPM was the only product we have evaluated.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Enterprise Planning Cloud has a well-defined objective for financial users with their budgeting and forecasting. We don't have another tool to do this with our core ERP cloud. Excel Smartview capability provides users with an easy user interface for doing their day to …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We used to use Prophix before we switched over to Oracle EPM Cloud. In general, Oracle EPM Cloud and Prophix have similar feature offerings, but Oracle EPM takes advantage of the current major leading technologies. We chose EPM Cloud since we needed to access the Cloud through …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
OneStream XF and .NET
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
It pretty much stands shoulder to shoulder with other businesses offering the same service.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle EPM Cloud is much more user-friendly when compared to Prophix. Oracle's Smart View, compared to Prophix Excel plug-ins, is a lot more flexible.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We haven't evaludated any other products in planing area.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
EPM has better service provided by tech support. Training is much better than others we compared.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
None at this time.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle was far better than any other products we looked at.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We selected it because it is efficient in almost 98 percent of our organizational needs.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We have not evaluated other products.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
The interactions with other cubes needs to be improved. Availability of more cubes and cell limits would improve functionality in Oracle EPM - EPBCS
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is one of the more robust and well-rounded EPMs on the market. It comes with robust out-of-the-box functionality which is a great benefit in comparison to its peers. The Excel integration is also top notch which Financial Analysts really …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
OneStream is a very young product and young company, however, it offers a singular platform for both budgeting and consolidation. In addition, Onestream is not built on Essbase (a product that is rather old) and therefore has more dynamic capabilities. OneStream does not, …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Access did not seem user-friendly and did not have the security we required. Oracle Planning has robust security and is easy to get used to and use.
Features
FloQastOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Financial data consolidation7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports8.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Multi-currency management4.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.70 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customizable Workflows8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
Ratings
30% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
Ratings
23% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
Ratings
15% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
Ratings
3% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.6
Ratings
20% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.8
Ratings
17% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.0
Ratings
15% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FloQastOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses
Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 7.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 9.8 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FloQastOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.3
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FloQastOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
It's really good in ensuring all of our accounting/finance people are on the same page and knowing what work is outstanding, at what step in the process reconcs or checklists or at, if we're tracking on time, who may need some additional support, etc. It really does a great job of letting us know when accounts are out of balance and needs to be looked at again. Ensures we will be fully ready for audit and pass with flying colors.
Read full review
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking of close tasks thanks to the monthly close calendar option
  • Review - tasks are stamped with the reviewer name & date reviewed
  • Ease of review - attachments are uploaded, account balances are populated via communication with the ERP, Note feature allows for review comments
Read full review
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be great to see drill down capabilities between account reconciliations/flux analyses that links to our transactional data in our ERP.
  • I would like to see a litte more customization available in the analytics tab to add custom filter drop downs.
  • I believe this is close to being released, but I'd like to see anticipated time commitments on the task level to be able to easily review capacity type reporting/analytics.
Read full review
  • Our implementation consultant set up all the business rules for calculations to get us live, and we may have difficulty setting up new ones going forward. We feel like that we now need to hire someone who has the technical knowledge to help us to manage the system going forward.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
It produces consolidated multi currency reports faster and more accurately whilst adding additional pivotal functionality. The Smartview reporting is a key for us and a flagstone of the application
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
In-Person Training
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
The biggest key is data validation time. If you are implementing a new chart of accounts along with Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud, you need to multiply the time you think you can perform data validation by 2. The key to managing your project timeline is managing your expectations around data validation as well. For instance, it is recommended you convert 1-3 years vs. 5 years.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used BlackLine at my previous job. Now I use FloQast at my current job. FloQast is, in my opinion, much easier to use than BlackLine and the looks and feels of the website are more user friendly and visually pleasing. BlackLine seemed like a separate system and was not really connected to Intacct (they used Intacct as well at my previous job). Everything just seemed clumsy with that system. FQ is smoother.
Read full review
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is one of the more robust and well-rounded EPMs on the market. It comes with robust out-of-the-box functionality which is a great benefit in comparison to its peers. The Excel integration is also top notch which Financial Analysts really appreciate. Cost is a little high and maintenance is a bit heaver than other tools so that is something to consider. The product keeps improving!
Read full review
Scalability
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Has helped to reduce time to close from 7-8 days to 5 days .
  • Allows all entities to follow the same process globally. This has reduced risk and allowed great oversight at the parent entity level.
  • This has allowed the accounting team to provide real-time updates to the CFO and FP&A on close status.
Read full review
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment