FloQast vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FloQast
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
Vena
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
FloQastVena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FloQastVena
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FloQastVena
Considered Both Products
FloQast
Chose FloQast
FloQast provides support without getting in the way of the process (at the time of considering options, BlackLine got in the way with required journal entry park and post steps). It allows for enough flexibility to adjust between team members for sharing coverage in a small …
Vena

No answer on this topic

Features
FloQastVena
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
7.9
126 Ratings
1% below category average
Vena
7.8
258 Ratings
1% below category average
Financial data consolidation7.776 Ratings8.4227 Ratings
Journal entries and reports8.756 Ratings7.5177 Ratings
Multi-currency management4.739 Ratings7.1164 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.592 Ratings8.7227 Ratings
Customizable Workflows8.8106 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.1163 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings6.8122 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings8.0200 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.2
152 Ratings
8% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.1104 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.4138 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.0146 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
248 Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.7235 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.7236 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.3100 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.5211 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.5
199 Ratings
4% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.1118 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.8153 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.5167 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.6153 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
144 Ratings
9% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.9131 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.6109 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings8.0120 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.264 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.7
239 Ratings
2% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.8224 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.6224 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.7225 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.892 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.6176 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
7.8
134 Ratings
2% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.7130 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.9117 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.7
293 Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.9268 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.9285 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.5275 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.3249 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.8276 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.6
279 Ratings
7% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.8252 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.8263 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.5269 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.7211 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings7.497 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.5
225 Ratings
5% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.8197 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings9.4153 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.3173 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.3187 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.4168 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.0135 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Vena
8.8
273 Ratings
6% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings8.4226 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.4255 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.4208 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FloQastVena
Small Businesses
Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 7.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 9.2 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.9 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FloQastVena
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(153 ratings)
8.7
(289 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(7 ratings)
8.8
(21 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(6 ratings)
8.7
(33 ratings)
Availability
6.7
(4 ratings)
8.3
(9 ratings)
Performance
7.4
(3 ratings)
7.7
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(10 ratings)
9.0
(102 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(2 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(2 ratings)
7.9
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(3 ratings)
8.4
(8 ratings)
Configurability
7.3
(3 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.4
(3 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(4 ratings)
8.2
(8 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.4
(3 ratings)
7.7
(5 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.4
(3 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
FloQastVena
Likelihood to Recommend
FloQast
I used another vendor for close management before, and comparing the two, FloQast is easier to use and the site navigation is much easier. The looks and feels of the site are more engaging and pleasant. As mentioned before in the previous question, their Journal Entry posting functionality is not suited for a company with multiple entities since it only allows you to book an entry when debits and credits are hitting the same entity
Read full review
Vena Solutions
I find it well suited for month end close sheets that we use between our Operations and Finance teams. I also find budgeting very easy. Reporting is easily the #1 for me where it feeds from our accounting software but can be seen and used by our Operations team. It also integrates with other software that we use so that Finance can see details of what Operations inputs.
Read full review
Pros
FloQast
  • Provides a clear status of the month end close.
  • Allows us to analyze tasks by team member and reassign as needed.
  • It syncs with our ERP Netsuite to ensure balance sheet reconciliations can be tied out directly.
  • It also connects with Slack to notify users of key deadlines and changes in review status for team tasks.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Preparation of financial reports in an automated/systematic way
  • Ability to drill from high level financial numbers into the details
  • Managing a workflow for budgeting/forecasting process that allows for detailed access for individual people/teams
  • Once you learn how to map reports, editing or creating new reports isn't difficult
  • Ability to set up reports in a wide range of different ways: users can select report filters, showing summary amounts vs expanding details, etc.
Read full review
Cons
FloQast
  • A setting to allow for attachments to automatically be opened within the app (Adobe, Excel, etc.) rather than as a separate tab in the browser
  • Some of our tasks are quarterly or annual so assigning a very specific date would be helpful
  • Eliminate the need of "closing" review notes. Once we change the status to Resolved, that should be sufficient. Make Resolved and Closed one and the same
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • It could improve the ease of implementation; it could take a long for an inexperienced IT team.
  • From the ERP system perspective, it can be linked easily, but it has room for improvement when you make core changes and require a Vena specialist again.
  • Some administrators can get confused while working on Excel implementation; it has complicated technical requirements.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
FloQast
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena has been a huge win for us as an organization, as it vastly improved our budgeting process by removing manual consolidation that was incredibly time consuming, and it allows us to see a multi-year view of our organizational budget across all of our funding sources. We've seen Vena's platform grow over the years and we've not yet fully adopted some of them so it feels like there's still potential to get even more value out of the platform.
Read full review
Usability
FloQast
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
Vena Solutions
I would rate Vena's overall usability as an 8 out of 10. Vena offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those familiar with Excel, making it relatively easy to use. Most features are intuitive. However, some advanced functionalities may require more training or time to master, so it's not a perfect score. Overall, Vena provides a solid user experience that supports efficient financial planning.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
FloQast
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena has been available and running. There are notifications well ahead of scheduled maintenance and so far, scheduled maintenance has been occurring during off hours and fortunately has not occurred during a time that is crucial for us to be actively using.
Read full review
Performance
FloQast
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena Solutions pages load quickly and only a few times does it get a bit slow, only when there are many integrations and the reports are long. But in general it is always fast and honestly I am very satisfied with the speed in the generation of statistical reports and the pages
Read full review
Support Rating
FloQast
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
Vena Solutions
They are very quick to respond when you submit a ticket and typically fix issues quickly as well. I only didn't give this a 10 because there is still an open issue with our Salesforce connection that we've been waiting on now for a few months.
Read full review
In-Person Training
FloQast
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Our initial in person training was a little rough b/c I felt like our trainer wanted to focus on maximizing Vena rather than understanding what we were needing for our organization. He was very responsive and added insights, but could have worked to understand our needs a little better.
Read full review
Online Training
FloQast
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
FloQast
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
Vena Solutions
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
FloQast
At the time we picked FloQast, they were the most cost effective and easiest tool to use. Fast forward a little bit, and Numeric has come to market. I really lie Numeric to be honest and feel that their pricing is better and for that lower pricing, they include more functions. However, we continued with FloQast for ease of continuity and my team is time strapped. What that said, FloQast is great - nothing wrong with it other than it could be cheaper.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena Solutions stands out due to its familiar Excel-based interface, making it easy for our team to adopt without extensive training. Compared to alternatives like Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion, Vena's strong customer support and efficient automation have significantly reduced our budgeting cycle time. We chose Vena for its seamless integration with our existing systems and substantial time-saving benefits, ultimately enhancing our decision-making process.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
FloQast
I had no control over the contract
Read full review
Vena Solutions
No answers on this topic
Scalability
FloQast
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
FloQast
  • Floqast has reduced our closing schedule by roughly 15-20% of the time it took us beforehand.
  • The product has been very beneficial for us during audit time when we can easily demonstrate our control workflows on reconciliation and task approvals.
  • I can update our CFO at any point in time how we are trending towards close and can coordinate with finance as to the moment journal entries have been completed
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Eliminated the necessity to manually combine multiple Excel budget worksheets into one file in order to compile an org-wide budget
  • Allows end-users to be self-sufficient by having the ability to drill into transaction-level detail and conduct ad-hoc analyses
  • Created more bandwidth in the FP&A team to spend more time on more meaningful analysis
Read full review
ScreenShots

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard