Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued) vs. Zscaler Internet Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.N/A
McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
McAfee WebAdvisor was a tool that helped to keep Internet browsers safe from malicious websites for general users. It is not a focus for Trellix, the company formed from the merger of McAfee and FireEye that provides business-grade security products, and the company recommends alternatives.N/A
Zscaler Internet Access
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Internet Access™ (ZIA) is a secure web gateway (SWG), delivering cloud native cyberthreat protection and zero trust access to the internet and SaaS apps.N/A
Pricing
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionMcAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)Zscaler Internet Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forcepoint DLPMcAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)Zscaler Internet Access
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionMcAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)Zscaler Internet Access
Considered Multiple Products
Forcepoint DLP
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Nobody can compete with Forcepoint DLP.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I think Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pales in comparison to the feature set you get with M365 (which is likely included in most corporations existing licensing!). We moved on from Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to implement Microsoft's solution instead.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We tested and evaluated Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and this solution suited the best for our requirement. We optimized it to suit our requirement of 250 to 300 users in our head office. We will be adding a few more users under this solution which are having Windows and MAC …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I find Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to be a superior product compared to the other two alternatives mentioned. It is improving, though, at a slower pace but I have seen it upgrading to its best level. There is more value associated with this tool than the other two. …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Because it allows the creation of reports and statistics, risk assessment, real-time monitoring, fingerprints, machine learning, [and] a dictionary function--so good and useful.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I have evaluated CoSoSys but the reporting part did not hit the mark. Also, a high number of false positives was a concern for me. I need a predefined report which needs to be compatible with my compliance requirement, which was missing in CoSoSys. However CoSoSys is good for …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We have not done a ton of testing with alternatives at this point.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Netskope, Digital Guardian. We've stuck with Forcepoint to limit the number of major architectural changes in a given year. If we achieved diminishing marginal returns on its ROI, then we'd change because the prevention is good, but the headache has to be less than the …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We have tried out Office 365 and Trend Micro DLP but those solutions have not worked out as we hoped. That said, when we looked at Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, there were only minor issues we came across that did not have any negative impact and overall, the solution was …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but Proofpoint has proven to be a superior product. In our experience Proofpoint has fewer false positives and more out-of-the-box pattern detections requiring less customization. However, there is still a value in having more than one DLP …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Haven't used other product.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We didn't evaluate any other solutions at the time of purchase. Forcepoint was the leader on the Gartner report and we went with their recommendation.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We selected Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention because it meets the size of our organization's needs and the ease of implementation compared to other solutions.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We selected Forcepoint DLP as we already were using their Web and Email filtering products. The integration among their products is very strong and we did not want to introduce too many additional products into our environment. We have limited security resources so a high level …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Easier to user and cheaper
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We are currently in the evaluation phase to compare overall cost and functionality. Blue Coat runs in a very similar way that Forcepoint does. Check Point runs at the same gateway layer that the firewall does so its policy can be run on the same hardware of existing environments.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint stacks up pretty well against its competitors. It has more functionality then Cisco and is comparable to McAfee. McAfee is one of the few I would feel at ease with replacing our currently solution with.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Overall it was the best we had, SSL decryption worked better than Bluecoat and Cisco traffic had a lot of certificate issues. Websense was the quickest to get up and running and their sales engineering team is superb.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense has similar features to other DLP solutions. We selected Websense based upon other organizations' experiences. I cannot compare the negatives to Websense as we did not deploy any other vendor DLP solutions in the same scale.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense, at the time, was the only content filtering solution to offer a hybrid option of on-prem and cloud services. We are up for renewal soon and will likely compare them to other vendors.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense gave us the best flexibility for our enterprise configuration and setup. It all does not take up anything on our computers when we use Websense one armed off our firewalls and routers. We found this very easy to set up and transparent to our users and network. The …
McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)

No answer on this topic

Zscaler Internet Access
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access is a great compliment as they all work together with seamless integration.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Cortex Xpanse by Palo Alto Networks
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
ZCC being one implementation with Zscaler Internet Access and ZPA being on the same app, that made the decision easier, also with the partnership that Zscaler brought to the table.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Netskope Cloud Firewall
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
We keep using the other products, but for network traffic Zscaler Internet Access tends to be the best solution, although for Infoblox we are using their DNS solution, and for CrowdStrike, we are focusing on other items more related to EDR than network.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
I prefer it by far, it works well with integrations, it is built to grow with us, and support us.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access is more granular.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Free pov was huge. We didn't get that with Cato.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Deception
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Scalability and visibility.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
The overall user community and scope of supportability outweighed the others on our short list. Netskope was a close second, but the risk, though small, was greater than that of bringing Zscaler aboard. We were looking for a mature, well-supported, highly functional, and …
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
CrowdStrike Falcon
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
We have differences, but we are happy with Zscaler.
Features
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionMcAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)Zscaler Internet Access
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
5.9
Ratings
30% below category average
McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
-
Ratings
Data Encryption5.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
-
Ratings
McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
5.0
Ratings
56% below category average
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
-
Ratings
McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
10.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
-
Ratings
McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.4
Ratings
10% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
-
Ratings
McAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionMcAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)Zscaler Internet Access
Small Businesses
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
1Password
1Password
Score 9.3 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
1Password
1Password
Score 9.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionMcAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)Zscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
7.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionMcAfee WebAdvisor (discontinued)Zscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
-Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
Read full review
McAfee Web Protection is a great tool when your work requires you to surf the internet a lot and download files. Being a Software Developer, I have to search for a lot of things and have to visit lots of websites for solutions or learning new concepts. Having McAfee's Web Protection enables me to visit only the sites that are safe and it even blocks the trackers. It also scans the files (usually software and codes) that I download and lets me know whether they are safe to open or not.
Read full review
It has been pretty great in our deployment; the ability to send specific messages to users, or to isolate with a banner, has given us more control without blunt "this was blocked for this reason" landing pages. We have a lot of YouTube use, and it's difficult to police the legitimate use from personal use. Because of this, the quotas have been an effective way to achieve traffic goals without getting in users' way.
Read full review
Pros
  • The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Endpoint module is applied to secure data being used at endpoints, like from Microsoft Excel and other Microsoft capabilities, also other functions like email and FTP, Active Sync, etc. It secures the data in use at the endpoint.
  • The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Network Module is applied for the traffic being used in network capabilities like email, FTP, and web. It also secures the data on the move in the network.
  • Forcepoint Data Discover--the capability to discover the data which is sensitive for the organization and lies across the network; with the discovery tool, we can define the data, which is important based on regulatory and compliance risk.
  • OCR (optical character recognition) capabilities also come with the Data Discover Module, by which we can see the embedded text inside the image and that helps to prevent sensitive data theft.
Read full review
  • Make Web Surfing safe and secure.
  • Block Trackers.
  • Notifies if a webpages are safe.
  • Scans downloads.
Read full review
  • Provides a secure VPN connection point for endpoint connectivity.
  • Provides the VPN connectivity in a fast and reliable connection state.
  • Very dependable, once connected the connection stays up and there's no fuss.
  • Very good at letting you know when you are not authenticated.
  • Very easy to authenticate and regain access when your session times out.
Read full review
Cons
  • Remote filtering is not as advanced as we would like.
  • Support time is not as quick as needed in most cases.
  • Upgrades of appliances and software is not as easy as other solutions.
  • HTTPS inspection needs to hand a valid cert and doesnt work correctly with all vendors.
Read full review
  • It shows a lot of popups to upgrade to AntiVirus which gets annoying sometimes.
Read full review
  • ZS CLI support to turn off ZIA and ZDX service specifically on mac.
  • Better visibility into failed posture devices, including a timeline and the reason the posture failed (This is about the Zscaler mobile portal: Enrolled devices --> Failed posture devices).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
While Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) delivers critical value in cloud security and RBI compliance, I rate renewal likelihood 7/10 due to evolving needs versus platform limitations. Below is my rationale:
Key Gaps:
1. Advanced Threat Costs:
ZIA’s add-ons (e.g., Advanced DLP, Sandboxing) incur 35%+ cost premiums – straining budgets as transaction volumes (UPI/iMobile) grow 50% YoY.
2. API Banking Scalability:
ZIA’s API rate limits throttle real-time policy sync during UPI peaks (10K+ TPS), forcing workarounds for finacle integrations.
3. RBI Future-Proofing:
Limited native support for upcoming digital rupee (CBDC) security rules requires custom development, increasing compliance overhead.
Read full review
Usability
For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
The product is as expected. ZIA has been integrated and utilized as intended. Any modifications to rules in ZCC have been straightforward to implement. Although it has not been done yet, the segmentation for specific users is highly anticipated. The product received a 9, as no product is wholly perfect, but it has been great to use.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
There are often performance issues reported
Read full review
Support Rating
Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Zscaler's ZIA support is quick and knowledgable. They respond within 1-2 hours of you submitting your ticket. They are very thorough and are typically ready to jump on a live troubleshooting session. Our ZIA platform and how we use is it unique so at times tickets can be open for weeks but we alway get quality support compared to other unrelated product support in our enterprise
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
good the engineer give excellent support and eplanation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
We keep using the other products, but for network traffic Zscaler Internet Access tends to be the best solution, although for Infoblox we are using their DNS solution, and for CrowdStrike, we are focusing on other items more related to EDR than network.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The capability of this tool to update in real time has saved a lot of time and even saved a lot of energy for researching.
  • The exchange of financial information related to customers builds up an extreme risk of data loss, which can be damaging to the customer.
Read full review
  • I am not sure about that as I am just a user and have not been involved with the ROI aspect.
Read full review
  • I would say it has a very good ROI, as whenever someone can't access something, they submit a ticket to our network engineer, and within minutes, the site is safely added to ZIA with best-practice configurations. After seeing a little of the UI from the Zenith event, it seems very user-friendly to control these policies.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zscaler Internet Access Screenshots

Screenshot of an overview of Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA), a cloud native security service edge (SSE) solution that builds on a decade of secure web gateway leadership. Offered as a scalable SaaS platform through Zscaler's security cloud, it replaces legacy network security solutions, preventing advanced attacks and data loss with a comprehensive zero trust approach. ZIA is integrated into the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange™ to provide superior defense-in-depth, secure connectivity, end user experience, and administrative visibility and control.