TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Onapsis vs. Qualys TruRisk Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Forcepoint DLP

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AForcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.N/A

    Onapsis

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/AOnapsis, headquartered in Boston, offers application security software to enterprises in the form of the Onapsis Security Platform for SAP and the Onapsis Security Platform for Oracle E-Business Suite.N/A

    Qualys TruRisk Platform

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AQualys TruRisk Platform (formerly Qualys Cloud Platform, or Qualysguard), from San Francisco-based Qualys, is network security and vulnerability management software featuring app scanning and security, network device mapping and detection, vulnerability prioritization schedule and remediation, and other features to provide vulnerability management and network attack surface reduction.N/A
    Pricing
    Forcepoint DLPOnapsisQualys TruRisk Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Forcepoint DLPOnapsisQualys TruRisk Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Forcepoint DLPOnapsisQualys TruRisk Platform
    Considered Multiple Products
    Forcepoint
    No answer on this topic
    Onapsis
    No answer on this topic
    Qualys
    Chose Qualys TruRisk Platform
    I have not used other products like qualys cloud platform so I can't comment on how it compares, but I can say that we are happy with this solution that we currently have in place.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    87%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    85%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    87%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    87%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    85%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    85%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Forcepoint DLPOnapsisQualys TruRisk Platform
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Onapsis and Qualys TruRisk Platform
    Feature
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    6.2
    2 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Onapsis
    -
    Ratings
    Qualys TruRisk Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Data Encryption6.22 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Onapsis and Qualys TruRisk Platform
    Feature
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    -
    Ratings
    Onapsis
    -
    Ratings
    Qualys TruRisk Platform
    8.7
    7 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings8.96 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.87 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.27 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.97 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.77 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Onapsis and Qualys TruRisk Platform
    Feature
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    -
    Ratings
    Onapsis
    -
    Ratings
    Qualys TruRisk Platform
    8.5
    9 Ratings
    2% above category average
    IT Asset Realization00 Ratings00 Ratings8.89 Ratings
    Authentication00 Ratings00 Ratings7.96 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings00 Ratings8.57 Ratings
    Web Scanning00 Ratings00 Ratings8.88 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings00 Ratings8.67 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Forcepoint DLPOnapsisQualys TruRisk Platform
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Rencore Code (SPCAF)
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Checkmarx
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Forcepoint DLPOnapsisQualys TruRisk Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.7
    (35 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.6
    (25 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.6
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.3
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (7 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Forcepoint DLPOnapsisQualys TruRisk Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Forcepoint
    -Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    Onapsis is divided into 4 major components,
    1. Assess
    2. Comply
    3. Defend
    4. Control
    In assess, it does a whitebox and blackbox testing of the ERP systems that have been added to the Onapsis console. It highlights relevant application issues and automates the process, also provides the solutions to implement the fix. In comply, it provides a governance on the various regulatory compliances which the firm has to follow, as well as provides a firm grip to the audit and ERP admin team. In control, it enables a workflow of 15 pre-defined parameter values within the SAP system and helps monitor, and track the changes made to those parameters. The capabilities are to either block, or request for an approval for changes made to those parameters in addition to just monitoring them. In defend, it goes through the SAP logs; and compares it with a pre-defined ruleset to alert the end-users via email or SIEM tool or both.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qualys
    Qualys Cloud Platform is well suited for organizations that need additional tools to secure and bolster their security from end to end. The automated, real-time threat protection is very quick to notify an admin of potential vulnerabilities and risks, as well as recommending quick fixes to resolve/close the gap before an incident occurs. QCP excels at portraying all of these in a single pane of glass, and find that the Qualys reports are more detailed than competitor product lines. One of our big issues with QCP is that you do have to pay for each scanner, which can quickly add up to large costs. For this reason, I would rate Qualys at a ~7 due to great features and functionality, but overall value could be better for a large organization. I would also say that QCP may make more sense for smaller organizations due to this pricing model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Forcepoint
    • It has predominantly protected us from unauthorized parties and has provided us with better visibility and control over our data.
    • This software has also successfully prevented us from both malicious and accidental tasks, which are quite flexible actions when it comes to the violation of data loss prevention policies.
    • This product has been successful in improving compliance and even mitigating compliance violations, which further facilitated IT security.
    • I think there is room for improvement, as the user interface is slightly rough and difficult to adopt in the beginning. The software also hangs up at a few instances, which leads to some wasting of time and annoyance, but other than that, this software is good. The technical staff should work on the complexities for a better user experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    • Eliminating the manual process improves the overall accuracy of results and also frees up valuable resources to focus on other different projects.
    • Onapsis provides great leverage to our technical teams in order to review in a standardized way of the landscape.
    • Onapsis always matches vulnerabilities with useful context and finds possible solutions.
    • Onapsis is usually implemented to continuously monitor, and alert us on any issues on the SAP systems. Not only this but implementing Onapsis also eliminates the network on the year-end and month-end audits and helps in making the overall process faster, smooth, efficient as well as accurate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qualys
    • It really does well at vulnerability scanning, which it is well known for. It's accuracy at finding vulnerabilities is top notch, more so than a lot of other vulnerability tools out there. In an organization/company you want this kind of accuracy at finding vulnerabilities in your network/endpoints
    • It is very good at managing endpoints on a consistent basis, meaning you can add endpoints to Qualys and have the platform scan/track/protect for vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis, without user intervention
    • It does really well at separating out and identifying what levels of criticality each vulnerability should fall into. This way, an organization/company can attack the more critical vulnerabilities first
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Forcepoint
    • Forcepoint technical support--specially for users who go with essential support--is challenging to get support on time. You need the ticket to be raised long beforehand to get support from TAC. However, in the case of enterprise support, its is not like this technical person will come on a priority basis.
    • However it comes with higher prices, especially for SMB, it is allowed to pay that amount for support only.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    • Multiple UIs
    • No proper customization of UI log-off
    • Tedious setup of Control component
    • No proper error messages received
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qualys
    • This program is really complicated, the multiple functions that are presented to us are not very clear and in some cases, it is a matter of intuition to execute a function, it is not very informative.
    • The interface of this program can be a real problem; for our taste, this program looks a bit messy, and the interface does not help or guide you to find the options you need.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Forcepoint
    We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    No answers on this topic
    Qualys
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Forcepoint
    For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    No answers on this topic
    Qualys
    Again, the usability of Qualys has been a pinpoint for this entire review. It was easily the worst thing about the product and because of this, I would not recommend Qualys to anybody in my field. This should be something that Qualys strives to improve if they wish to stay in business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Forcepoint
    Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    No answers on this topic
    Qualys
    They had a support page within the WAS to report any concerns or seek help. But the UI of that is not smooth. Regardless support staff were pretty responsive and helpful. They scheduled calls to understand and address our problems. Email support is good as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Forcepoint
    User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    Honestly, I havent use something like Onapsis before and currently I am not aware if there is something similiar out there. They are one of a kind and is a complete suit, so is unlikelly that someone from outside will appear with a better solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qualys
    As described before Qualys is used to scan periodically the environment in order to check if there are some packages (Linux) or Applications (Windows) outdated, generating reports to the Service Owners, fulfilling what's is expected from us, attending all our expectations regarding the tool. That's why we'd choose Qualys to our organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Forcepoint
    • The exchange of financial documents with customers creates extreme risk as data loss could result in financial and reputation damage to the customer. The cost of deploying Forcepoint is fractions of pennies compared to the potential financial impact of data loss.
    • There is some administrative overhead associated as false positives are inevitable, requiring a manual review and a potential loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Onapsis
    • It offers very reasonable packages.
    • The customer support of Onapsis is reliable and efficient.
    • It is a great platform as it shows a unified and easy-to-read different and complex topics in a simpler way.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qualys
    • Big time-saving tool vs. having to comb through several system reports which ultimately can still have you missing unapproved software.
    • Quick snapshot via the dashboard provided a nice summary of where you're assets meet or do not meet your organization's policy requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots