FortiClient vs. IBM Security QRadar EDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FortiClient | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Fortinet offers FortiClient, their endpoint security system emphasizing automated advanced threat protection, security fabric integration, secure remote access, endpoint quarantine, and a comprehensive reporting dashboard. | N/A |
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
| FortiClient | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Specific pricing details for FortiClient services vary depending on the number of endpoints, the duration of the subscription, and the specific features included. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FortiClient | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 25 Answers | 100% Would buy again 11 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
92% Delivers good value for the price 23 Answers | 88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 19 Answers | 88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 21 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | |
| FortiClient | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FortiClient | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FortiClient | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.2 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| FortiClient | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |











