FortiClient vs. Jamf Protect
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FortiClient | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Fortinet offers FortiClient, their endpoint security system emphasizing automated advanced threat protection, security fabric integration, secure remote access, endpoint quarantine, and a comprehensive reporting dashboard. | N/A |
Jamf Protect | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Developed exclusively for macOS, Jamf Protect provides a solution to maintain endpoint compliance, monitor for, respond to, and remediate security incidents on macOS with minimal impact to the device and end-user experience. Jamf Protect detects Mac-specific threats, and prevents known malware from running on devices and quarantines them for later analysis. Jamf Protect forwards data to a system of record to ensure a security posture, fleetwide, stays compliant by monitoring security settings on… | N/A |
| FortiClient | Jamf Protect | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Specific pricing details for FortiClient services vary depending on the number of endpoints, the duration of the subscription, and the specific features included. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FortiClient | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 25 Answers | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
92% Delivers good value for the price 23 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 19 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 21 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| FortiClient | Jamf Protect | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FortiClient | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FortiClient | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| FortiClient | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |






