GitKraken vs. Progress ShareFile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GitKraken
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.
$0
Progress ShareFile
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011, and is now offered by Progress Software.
$52.80
per month 3 users (minimum)
Pricing
GitKrakenProgress ShareFile
Editions & Modules
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
Advanced
$17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Premium
$27.50
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Industry Advantage
$45.83
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Virtual Data Room
$75.00
per month per user (minimum 5 users)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GitKrakenProgress ShareFile
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GitKrakenProgress ShareFile
Features
GitKrakenProgress ShareFile
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
GitKraken
9.9
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Progress ShareFile
-
Ratings
Branching and Merging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Version History10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Pull Requests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review Tools9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Access Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Branch Protection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
GitKraken
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
7.6
90 Ratings
9% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings7.672 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings6.354 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings5.849 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings7.877 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.884 Ratings
File search00 Ratings8.085 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings9.070 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
GitKraken
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.9
85 Ratings
3% above category average
User and role management00 Ratings9.079 Ratings
File organization00 Ratings9.185 Ratings
Device management00 Ratings8.567 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
GitKraken
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.4
86 Ratings
3% below category average
Performance00 Ratings8.182 Ratings
Reliability00 Ratings8.685 Ratings
Storage Reports00 Ratings8.568 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GitKrakenProgress ShareFile
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 4.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GitKrakenProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(5 ratings)
8.2
(113 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(2 ratings)
6.5
(26 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(14 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
GitKrakenProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
When we have a particularly large ad or job printing file that would "clog up" the email process, using ShareFile is very helpful. It's also useful for particular photographers we work with to upload a batch of photos all at once. Where it doesn't work as well for us is when trying to get clients to make use of a login to access folders. We find them reluctant to take on the learning curve. It works best for us when we just send them a clickable download link, and at most just require a tracking name and email address.
Read full review
Pros
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Customizable workflow steps help organize projects
  • Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints
  • Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • Secure File Storage and Sharing.
  • Workflows to get customer/affiliate responses to comments on documents.
  • I used to have the signature feature initially, but it was removed from the original plan, so I could only use it if I chose to select the higher plan price.
  • I love the upload notifications and reports on user activity.
  • The document storage versions are fantastic. I am the only user with Delete privileges, and I love that I can make those selections.
  • Integrations with Microsoft 365 - FANTASTIC - thank you.
Read full review
Cons
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost
  • Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate
  • Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story
  • User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • The web console is not the most user friendly site to use to get to, and send my files.
  • We have had users that have not liked the change in workflow to get files from Progress ShareFile when they were used to just clicking on files on an email.
  • That management of the tools are not the most user friendly. There have been some improvements but keeping up with certs and setting up new users can be more work than expected.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
It's a highly effective and secure storage system, has robust workarounds for serving the various equipment limits of our users, meets high security requirements of HIPAA standards, significantly reduces our needs for producing paper trails.
Read full review
Usability
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
Over the years, I have used many Git tools, but GitKraken stands out. It's now my favorite Git tool by far—excellent graphical overview of the branches, straightforward usage of all functionality, and lots of integration available. Currently, I am using GitKraken to connect to the ADO and quickly create PRs, using gitflow and tracking the work of my team mates.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is so easy to use I was able to download all of my projects files and have them set up to sync before my supervisor could even come over to explain the process to me. It is a neatly organized and intuitive software that allows even the less tech-savvy to become power users.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
The software has never been down when I needed to use it.
Read full review
Performance
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
Easy to use, easy to integrate with Outlook. I only gave it a 9 because I have found that sometimes it does not play nicely with Outlook and can slow it down. But, when that happens (not frequent), I restart Outlook and all is well again
Read full review
Support Rating
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
Citrix was generally responsive and helpful in solving technical issues. Like any cloud based SaaS product there is a danger that it may go down. This was a rare occurrence over my three years of using the product. The more common issue we encountered was clients forgetting their login which was easily managed through a forgot password functionality.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
Good documentation for the API. With a little help from RS tech staff, any competent programmer should be able to integrate RightSignature with an existing system in a week or three. That help is easy to get as well
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is easier and does what you need. I have moved a few organizations from SharePoint to ShareFile. Just easier. You can setup different areas for different departments, setup their permissions and it is easy enough for them to do what they want in their zones. The mobile app works great as well. So you can all the features you really use from SP, but just easier to setup and use.
Read full review
Scalability
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
I am a one person office. I have no idea how this software would scale to a larger office.
Read full review
Return on Investment
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Productivity bump for developers over previous software
  • Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed
  • Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • All of our clients and consulting engineers find ShareFile easy to use, thus complementing our business.
  • Our staff also find ShareFile intuitive, accessible, and easy to use, making it an ideal, everyday indispensable desktop tool for everyone in our company.
  • ShareFile can be linked to our firm's primary website as a placed for private use. We haven't found need for this yet, but might in the future.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GitKraken Screenshots

Screenshot of

Progress ShareFile Screenshots

Screenshot of the ShareFile dashboardScreenshot of ShareFile's Outlook PluginScreenshot of the Projects interfaceScreenshot of ShareFile's link sharing optionsScreenshot of ShareFile's e-signature