TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GitKraken

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AGitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.

    $0

    HighQ

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AHighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
    Pricing
    GitKrakenHighQ
    Editions & Modules
    Hosted by GitKraken
    Customized according to the amount of team members.
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GitKrakenHighQ
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    GitKrakenHighQ
    Version Control Software Features
    Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of GitKraken and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    GitKraken
    9.9
    1 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    -
    Ratings
    Branching and Merging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version History10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version Control Collaboration Tools10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pull Requests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Review Tools9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Access Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Testing Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Tracking Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Branch Protection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of GitKraken and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    GitKraken
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
    Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of GitKraken and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    GitKraken
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of GitKraken and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    GitKraken
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GitKrakenHighQ
    Small Businesses
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GitKrakenHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GitKrakenHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    • Customizable workflow steps help organize projects
    • Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints
    • Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
    • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
    • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    • Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost
    • Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate
    • Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story
    • User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    Over the years, I have used many Git tools, but GitKraken stands out. It's now my favorite Git tool by far—excellent graphical overview of the branches, straightforward usage of all functionality, and lots of integration available. Currently, I am using GitKraken to connect to the ADO and quickly create PRs, using gitflow and tracking the work of my team mates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    • Productivity bump for developers over previous software
    • Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed
    • Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
    • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
    • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GitKraken Screenshots

    Product screenshot