GLPI vs. SAP Service Cloud

GLPI is
well suited to an on prem environment, I work for a company that values open-source
software and European solutions.
I have no
experience with GLPI cloud hosted solution or their support as we have in house
devs that fix and improve our installation, their community in the support forum
is excellent if you have a question or want advice on an issue.

Incentivized

SAP Service Cloud is well suited with its omni-channel capabilities giving the possibility to collect service requests from different channels like phone, e-mail or CTI telephony. It also has nice User Interface (when it comes to desktop version). On the other hand SAP Service Cloud needs to be definitiely improved in terms of mobile app, which is horrible and it has limited development possibilities.

Incentivized

• Tickering
• Inventory
• FAQ

Incentivized

• First is It is highly effective when we consider Customer Relation Engagement.
• Good User Interface by which anyone can get used to it quickly.
• It is providing infinite opportunity of integration with other SAP solutions.
• Affordable Solutions with effective features.
• It has prebuilt charts which helps us to define customer journey with ease of efforts.

Incentivized

• Lack of auto update mechanism.
• Admin interface is somewhat dated.

Incentivized

• While SAP Service Cloud offers a wealth of features, its interface can sometimes feel overwhelming. For newcomers, especially those not tech-savvy, a more intuitive or simplified layout would be beneficial.
• While it allows for some level of personalization, making deep customizations can be challenging. Given the unique requirements of our client's customer service, having more flexibility in tailoring the tool to our exact needs would be nice.
• While SAP Service Cloud integrates well within the SAP ecosystem, it can sometimes be less smooth when linking up with non-SAP third-party tools. Enhancing these integrations would streamline our operations, especially when using other software tools alongside it.

Incentivized

SAP Service Cloud offers sturdy competencies for case control, workflow automation, and purchaser engagement. However, since our organization continues to be within the early assessment section, we have not but experienced its complete potential. Once fully applied and custom designed to our desires, the score can also increase as we investigate usability and integration with other SAP solutions.

Incentivized

We’ve used
GLPI for many years and the interface has gotten better with every major
release, the dashboard is easy to use and customizable.

With the
massive catalogue of plugins, you can change or add so many features and if you
have the right team, you can turn it into a completely unique piece of
software.

So, if the
default setup isn’t to your liking you can tweak it extensively.

Incentivized

I have found that sometimes issues reported to the SAP takes more time also they lack system support with respect to the priority . Also we don't see RCA for the issues raised. Also turn around time for the issues is not fixed as the support is global sometimes the issues float here and there.

Incentivized

We selected GLPI because it is free software, and because of the potential it expected to have. We do not consider other alternatives.

Incentivized

Zoho Desk is the ultimate software for clear communication, but when we compared these two according to our needs, we found out that SAP Service Cloud is the best option for us. Since it provides everything in one location, Zoho Desk is somewhat lacking in this area. That was the reason for choosing SAP Service Cloud.

Incentivized

• Quick resolution of incidents
• User satisfaction measurement

Incentivized

• can help speed up issue resolution, reducing the time customers spend waiting for solutions
• AI insights help predict the customer profile, satisfaction, and possible options for service resolutions
• One stop for all historical customer service requests and data and useful to calculate who are high CLTV customers

Incentivized