TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Cloud AI

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud AI provides modern machine learning services, with pre-trained models and a service to generate tailored models.N/A

    Infor Birst

    Score6.5 out of 10
    N/AInfor Birst offers multi-tenant cloud BI for deployment in a public or private cloud, or on-premises. It provides an in-memory columnar data store and a BI layer comprising a reporting engine, predictive analytics tools, mobile native apps, dashboards, discovery tools, and an open client interface.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Cloud AIInfor Birst
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Cloud AIInfor Birst
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Google Cloud AIInfor Birst
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Google Cloud AI and Infor Birst
    Feature
    Google Cloud AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    7.4
    77 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.068 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.077 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.159 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Google Cloud AI and Infor Birst
    Feature
    Google Cloud AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    7.0
    78 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.078 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.077 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings6.127 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.068 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Google Cloud AI and Infor Birst
    Feature
    Google Cloud AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    8.0
    75 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings8.052 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.067 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings7.28 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.066 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Google Cloud AI and Infor Birst
    Feature
    Google Cloud AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    6.9
    72 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.072 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.058 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.833 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Google Cloud AI and Infor Birst
    Feature
    Google Cloud AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    8.3
    72 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.070 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.068 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.069 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Google Cloud AI and Infor Birst
    Feature
    Google Cloud AI
    -
    Ratings
    Infor Birst
    5.0
    54 Ratings
    43% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.052 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings3.034 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings3.042 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Cloud AIInfor Birst
    Small Businesses
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Cloud AIInfor Birst
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    7.5
    (99 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (35 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.1
    (6 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    6.0
    (19 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.3
    (6 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (24 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (76 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Cloud AIInfor Birst
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Google Cloud AI is a wonderful product for companies that are looking to offset AI and ML processing power to cloud APIs, and specific Machine Learning use cases to APIs as well. For companies that are looking for very specific, customized ML capabilities that require lots of fine-tuning, it may be better to do this sort of processing through open-source libraries locally, to offset the costs that your company might incur through this API usage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    Infor Birst OEM and embedded analytics are well suited for advanced analytics and business intelligence. It has flexible deployment features and a lot of configuration ability with low code - no coding ability. Ability to ingest data from multiple live data sources. Source data from multiple sources can be segregated into multiple sections based on business criteria. Easily searchable business terms (metadata) across all enterprise analytic content.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • good conversion from the voice to the text
    • speed in the conversion from voice to text
    • time-saving in the conversion activity
    • analysis of the results of the conversion in real time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • End-to-end solution, from raw source data, ETL, warehousing and reporting, Birst is able to do everything we need in one package instead of needing to develop and maintain multiple technologies
    • Intuitive report development. The drag and drop creation of reports is simple. More complicated queries are easy to generate.
    • Very user-friendly and interactive. A lot of nice features are available both for developers and end users to streamline the process of preparing and consuming data
    • Rich API which allows us to programmatically interact with Birst
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Some of the build in/supported AI modules that can be deployed, for example Tensorflow, do not have up-to-date documentation so what is actually implemented in the latest rev is not what is mentioned in the documentation, resulting in a lot of debugging time.
    • Customization of existing modules and libraries is harder and it does need time and experience to learn.
    • Google Cloud AI can do a better job in providing better support for Python and other coding languages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • Birst prices are fairly expensive. License plus cost of users can add up pretty quickly
    • Depending on the size of data, rendering of reports can take a little bit. Need faster processing of data
    • Takes a little time to understand how to build reports, not the most intuitive UI
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    We are extremely satisfied with the impact that this tool has made on our organization since we have practically moved from crawling to walking in the process of generating information for our main task to investigate in the field through interviews. With the audio to text translation tool there is a difference from heaven to earth in the time of feeding our internal data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    We have been able to overcome any of the drawbacks we've found with Birst easily and it has fulfilled almost all of our analytic needs to date. Having seen their roadmap it would be highly unlikely we would move away from this platform any time soon. You simply can't beat the functionality that Birst provides for the price and the things I see coming out of the company solidify that our decision to choose Birst was the best possible choice. We have never regretted the decision.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    I give 8 because although it´s a tool I really enjoy working with, I think Google Cloud AI's impact is just starting, therefore I can visualize a lot/space of improvements in this tool. As an example the application of AI in international environments with different languages is a good example of that space/room to improve.
    Read full review
    Infor
    I would like to see additional usability put into the ETL scripting. Recently, Birst added a nice function reference inline to formula creation which has kept me from having to return to documentation so much. The same in ETL would be very beneficial. The interface problems related to the Flex framework are being addressed in a rewrite to HTML 5, but for now they are still a hindrance to a higher usability rating.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Infor
    We frequently experience -103 errors due to us using the Live Connect functionality, which does not seem to handle even minor interruptions in connectivity, and treats all future connection attempts or data requests as errors, even if the issue does not exist any longer
    Read full review
    Performance
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Infor
    Everything runs very fast and smoothly. The only process that I wish was faster would be processing the data after uploading new data or making changes to the existing data model. It can take 15-20 minutes (roughly) to upload and process new data once you start getting into 10's of millions of rows. Given my experience with how long it takes me to pull the same data using SQL Server Management Studio, I don't think Birst is unreasonably slow - but for me to give a higher rating, I would want it to be unreasonably fast
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    Every rep has been nice and helpful whenever I call for help. One of the systems froze and wouldn't start back up and with the help of our assigned rep we got everything back up in a timely manner. This helped us not lose customers and money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • Poor turnaround time
    • Low response rate when the problem at hand are large
    • Lack of infrastructural knowledge when it comes to scaling solutions
    • Lack of inter team work noticed
    • Most of the tickets are open for a long period of time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Infor
    I have attended two different training sessions. The first one was my initial training on the system. It was well paced, clear and concise. If there were questions that were not able to be answered by the instructor, he took down the question and actually followed up and provided us a response quickly. The second session was specific to the dashboard and report design components. This training was very good though there were some attendants who had little or no experience and their questions slowed the class.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Infor
    Although I found the online resources helpful, a lack of appropriate examples for certain tasks key to report creation and advanced modeling make the online training/documentation less than perfect. For an inexperienced BI professional, the online training would not enable a streamlined launch of the product.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    In fact, you only need the basic tech knowledge to do a Google search. You need to know if your organization requires it or not,. our organization required it. And that is why we acquired it and solved a need that we had been suffering from. This is part of the modernization of an organization and part of its growth as a company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    Have clean data! Birst flexibility allows - Start small, then introduce functionality and complexity along the way. If you try to present all the functionality [bells and whistles] and wow them, but bad data is uncovered, the end user blames the new application and turns away.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    These are basic tools although useful, you can't simply ignore them or say they are not good. These tools also have their own values. But, Yes, Google is an advanced one, A king in the field of offering a wide range of tools, quality, speed, easy to use, automation, prebuild, and cost-effective make them a leader and differentiate them from others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    Birst was better than Domo for our needs because we could get in and tinker with it. Our impression of Domo was that it had a lot of connectors and ready to go reports, but it made too many assumptions about applications we use. We customize too much to use a "ready to go" solution like that. When we looked at Tableau, we liked its visualization capabilities, but it wasn't going to help us do the extractions, ETL, and warehousing of data. It may have come some distance since then.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Infor
    we can see that loading a lot of data can cause a noticable slow down in performance. Birst support indicated that they don't really consider anything less than 30 seconds to be an issue, but that is not the case for our customers, so we have had to change some of implementation to address this
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Artificial intelligence and automation seems 'free' and draws the organization in, without seeming to spend a lot of funds. A positive impact, but who is actually tracking the cost?
    • We want our employees to use it, but many resist technology or are scared of it, so we need a way to make them feel more comfortable with the AI.
    • The ROI seems positive since we are full in with Google, and the tools come along with the functionality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infor
    • Being a manufacturing company we tend to lag behind technologically. But having all the data for different ERP systems in one place has been an eye opener for the executives. It has lessened the need to convert some legacy ERP systems.
    • Having such a simple reporting tool is a great asset to some of our sites that have traditionally had trouble gathering data from AS400 systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Infor Birst Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot