Hire, by Google, was a recruiting app for G suite customers. The product includes functionality for applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, and candidate sourcing. Google sunsetted the product in late 2020.
N/A
SumTotal (legacy)
Score7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
The SumTotal Talent Expansion Suite included SumTotal (LMS), and was supported by Skillsoft since the October 2014 acquisition. Acquired by Cornerstone OnDemand in 2022, it is a legacy product, and Cornerstone recommends upgrading to their modern platform.
N/A
Pricing
Hire by Google (discontinued)
SumTotal (legacy)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hire by Google (discontinued)
SumTotal (legacy)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Hire by Google (discontinued)
SumTotal (legacy)
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SumTotal (legacy)
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
8.1
1 Ratings
2% above category average
SumTotal (legacy)
7.8
2 Ratings
9% above category average
Job Requisition Management
9.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.01 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
1.01 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Customized Application Form
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
10.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Collaboration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.01 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
7.92 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SumTotal (legacy)
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SumTotal (legacy)
8.2
2 Ratings
12% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SumTotal (legacy)
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SumTotal (legacy)
8.8
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SumTotal (legacy)
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SumTotal (legacy)
8.2
2 Ratings
18% above category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.92 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SumTotal (legacy)
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SumTotal (legacy)
7.0
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SumTotal (legacy)
Google Hire is very good at doing the basics well. I believe for most internal HR departments at small companies, this is all you need. It also works well for small to medium-sized staffing companies that just want something reliable and easy to use. What Google Hire doesn't do very well is be flexible. They don't have custom options, they don't have a ton of settings, and their development cycle is slow. As a result, it's pretty much what you see is what you get.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Very good for learning and development and training of employees. For Applicant tracking, recuirement, onboarding, and enablement, I prefer SAP SuccessFactors or Skillate. I also found that the SumTotal app is not very friendly on android and crashes sometimes and it is not optimized for mobile. Hence I end up never using it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google does search well so when I search through our database for candidates, I'm confident that I'm pulling up all the right people from what we have.
They have a modern and nice user interface - this is one of the biggest reasons to use it over other systems, as most ATS' are pretty ancient looking and not very pleasant to use.
Their support is very good at answering and addressing questions.
Their pricing is incredible. I'm sure at some point it will change, but for small companies paying 100+ per user for other ATS' - it's incredible to pay 100/month for the whole company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Despite many many months of requests, Google still hasn't implemented ANY custom fields. This makes it tough for an external recruiting firm to track what they want (most importantly: desired salary).
The job board integration is not great for external recruiters, mostly at the fault of Indeed. Indeed flagged us as a recruiting firm and so none of our jobs actually go live. While I know this is an Indeed problem (we had the same problem when using Bullhorn), Breezy ATS never has that problem for us so I don't know what they're doing differently.
Their development cycles are quite frankly very slow. I've requested some features, and while support is great about telling me it's coming or in the pipeline, I honestly don't really see a difference in the product since we started using it. It's still great to use, and we still love the software, but there haven't been too many visible improvements that make any difference to our work.
Being Google, it can sometimes be frustrating that one arm doesn't talk to the other. For example, they announced a Gmail for Works App/Extension integration, but for some reason when they launched it, admins of a domain couldn't install it. Google Hire pointed to the Google for Works team, and it took literally months to fix. Not the end of the world, but just very silly considering they're the same company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have transitioned from a position who supported the product to a position where I use the product. I continue to be impressed with the robustness of the product and how efficient it is. It is a user friendly software that can be used to navigate and accomplish tasks to meet organizational requirements.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I picked Google Hire after spending about 3 months on Bullhorn. I found Bullhorn to be terrible. It's WAY more customizable and theoretically powerful, but it's also a pain to set up and maintain. Even just getting your job page set up on your own site required tech support. Getting it eventually to what you want could be a great benefit, but Google Hire does great right out of the box and is a lot cheaper. Breezy HR is a great system. It's a bit more expensive than Google Hire for multiple job postings, but their system is equally easy to use and straight forward. However, we are all in on Google Products, so it was just a no brainer to go with Hire for a better price and most likely a better search function.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When I came to my company, they had been using a "light" LMS called Articulate. It was cheap and bare bones; i.e. not a lot of features, really just a platform to launch eLearning from and not real interface for student to utilize. When I began to overhaul the training department, this was one of the first things I changed. Articulate would only run courses built in their software, and the software was not 508 compliant. In addition, we had no ability to create learning plans, house transcripts, customize the interface, or manage the students. I made the choice to select and LMS that was a true LMS with all of the features that were critical to our clients' needs. Thus far, SumTotal has been able to support all of our needs, except one; mobile learning that is media rich
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google Hire makes, unfortunately, a very little impact on our ROI, but I think in the ATS world that's a good thing. It simply acts as a record that we can put everything in and easily reference, and the fact that it works overall makes it a positive software product in the long run.
While the search works great, I don't know that I've ever specifically found a candidate and placed them due to it. That could be a result of our job reqs though.
The biggest most obvious impact is really just the price. We needed a tool that does what Google Hire does, reliably. Most other companies charge at least 150 or so for 2 people, whereas Google Hire is 100/month for many users. It gives us flexibility for the future and helps minimize what could be a big expense. That definitely helps our bottom line.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info