Google Optimize vs. OpiaTalk

Google Optimize is well suited for testing small changes on the browser pages. You have the option of changing designs, texts, and some small features on the page. The audience can be divided using a long list of factors, so it makes it quite easy to set up the test. It is not well suited for complicated feature tests where you need to monitor the user over a long period or where the user is likely to use multiple sessions across multiple devices or browsers

Incentivized

• Easy to follow set up procedures. Once I walk a client through the process, it's effortless for them to emulate on subsequent tests.
• Lots of geo and user attribute customization features to be able to drill down into specific targeted audiences — all based on the power of Google's immense data system.
• Google Optimize is the logical choice for many people to start with since most are already familiar with and using GA.

Incentivized

• Track site performance with each test version; see if the resource timing of each test has anything to do with conversion rates.

Incentivized

Google has always been known to make easy-to-use products. The Google Optimize interface is intuitive and easy to follow for anyone.

Incentivized

Google has well-documented resources and unlimited use cases that can be found online. Plus, their support is always helpful and available.

Incentivized

Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites total traffic. Should integrate form analysis, heatmap, and page analytics.

Incentivized

• We were able to increase our main KPI for conversions by almost 50% by testing button copy.
• We were able to increase secondary KPIs for conversions by almost 30% by testing form design.

Incentivized