HockeyStack vs. Ortto

we need to analyze how users interact with our product page and we also need to know more than that, related to funnels and goals: which types of users are converting the best, where are users dropping off, etc. Helps us focus on our target audience. Overall, Software like this cannot really be criticized. The team releases so many features and keeps adding more to their roadmap. Some minor bugs may appear here and there, but the team quickly resolves them. As I mentioned earlier, lacks a few features compared to Google Analytics but not the major ones.

Incentivized

Autopilot has a friendly and bright appeal offering a code-free automation experience that makes it easy to build complex automated workflows. Anyone can start creating workflows using the drag-and-drop builder even without technical knowledge. Teams utilize the notes and graphics feature to collaborate on automation workflows providing a much easier way to understand workflows created by someone else.

Incentivized

• No more third party cookies so perfect for GA alternative
• Automatic Event Tracking for all Users, Goals, Audiences
• Clean UI and easy setup
• Doesn't require you to have a coding knowledge

Incentivized

• Very easy to use automation builder with many great options and integrations. Lets us tailor incredibly precise campaigns through use of Autopilot's own features, plus its tight integrations with data from sources like Segment.
• Easy and powerful email editing and creation built-in. No need for email template coding.
• Autopilot allows marketers to have full control and implement new web forms to capture leads quickly with its automatic form detection. No need to save custom form data to our own backend saves our development team time.

Incentivized

• Not as sophisticated and loved as google analytics
• lacks some features compared to google analytics again
• Survey feature is add on and have to pay extra

Incentivized

• Limited Design Customization: If you're an experienced marketer and are used to the unlimited customization capabilities of larger platforms (or coding your own templates), you might find Autopilot's options to be limiting. It's great for a beginner user who shouldn't be encumbered with those options, but I could see if being frustrating for others.

Incentivized

No use of cookies and ease to set up was the first thing that attracted us to HockyStacks. For new startups and small business developers, we found the pricing better.

Incentivized

How would I say this, for me Autopilot is a whole other tool then the other MA tools I use. Most other MA tools focus on a lot of options and things you can do with it. But Autopilot seems to mainly focus on the visual builder to make automations, and they do that really well! The other tools are also great but more a "complete package solution" with a lot of options. And that can be overwhelming. So if you want a great easy-to-use workflow/automation builder and less of all the other options Autopilot is a great start.

Incentivized

• Easy setup and clean UI/UX - saves time and money in implementation
• Increased our app downloads with better target audience detection

Incentivized

• Not sure. I cannot put a $ on it for ROI as I was the administrator and not part of the team that procured it. Time-wise I would say I spent less time using it than I previously had used in CloudPortal Services Manager.

Incentivized