Hydrograph vs. Looker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrograph | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Hydrograph is an open source ETL tool that allows developers to create complex graphs using a simple drag-and-drop interface. Users build ETL graphs by using the Hydrograph UI to link together input, transformation, and output components. Users can customize a variety of pre-built components or contribute back to Hydrograph by developing additional inputs, outputs, and transformations. To execute ETL jobs Hydrograph leverages Apache Spark as the backend engine. This allows Hydrograph to handle a… | N/A |
Looker | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems. | N/A |
| Hydrograph | Looker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Required | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Must contact sales team for pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Hydrograph | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 85 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Delivers good value for the price 75 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 87 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 55 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Implementation went as expected 69 Answers | |
| Hydrograph | Looker | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI Standard Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ad-hoc Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Report Output and Scheduling |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Data Discovery and Visualization |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Access Control and Security |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Mobile Capabilities |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Hydrograph | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Cyfe Score4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) Score8.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Jaspersoft Community Edition Score7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Hydrograph | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.2 |
| Usability | - | 8.8 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 6.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.8 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Configurability | - | 10.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 10.0 |
| Data Sharing and Collaboration | - | 8.5 |
| Data Sources | - | 7.3 |
| Ease of integration | - | 10.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Hydrograph | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Looker Screenshots |




