Alfresco vs. iGrafx

Easy integration with the external APIs Workflows can be invoked via REST call Wonderful swagger documentation for process REST APIs REST, MULE, CAMEL, Google Drive, and Box features are available with Alfresco Process Services The micro-service version deployment should be well documented and needs improvement

Incentivized

Mapping and process control are most important things for us .I can say ,It is very very user-friendly. If i were iGrafx , i would fix support service and do anything to help their customers better.Every departments that need business process should use iGrafx

Incentivized

• Basic workflows are easy enough for casual users to set up and utilize.
• Cloud sync capability provides a great way to share documents with third parties and to use as a backup system for critical documents.
• Alfresco mobile app makes it easy for those on the road to access, approve and share documents.
• Folder rules are easy to set up and make assignment of metadata easier to automate.

Incentivized

• user friendly
• easy implementation
• RPA and AI features
• measuring performance and risks

Incentivized

• Alfresco Process Services and Alfresco Application Development Framework integration makes for best functionality/application of ECM.
• Use case alignment - Marketing content and documentation of specific business requirements and user stories being available as reference material/documentation.
• Integration with multiple silos for content.

Incentivized

• Different cloud support
• local support training and documentation
• more advertising

Incentivized

As per the current market and the line of products that are available for content and document management system, Alfresco is a very good option compared to other systems in terms of features and cost. Plus the community support is great. Also since the product is open source, it can be extended or understood in a better way.

Incentivized

We are pleased to use iGrafx and we can handle all process about our departments.Easy to use and integration.I recommend it to everyone that needs BPM software.

Incentivized

The UI is very intuitive, most of our users figure out how to use the platform by themselves, so there's not much training needed.

You can upload files by using the web drag and drop, WebDAV, FTP, and more.

Most of the platform already works as-is so you can just deploy it using Docker and it's mostly ready to go.

Incentivized

It is easy to use .I can say it is piece of cake.

Incentivized

I am not big fan of Alfresco Content Services' support; it works on its own speed and sometimes it becomes challenging to achieve business needs. However, I appreciate regular delivery of security patches and updates

Incentivized

Late response and less experience are making the problem permanent. You should improve your support team and your process

Incentivized

Process was relatively smooth and overall, downtime minimal. MSI was very responsive to our needs and made the transition easier than it otherwise might have been.

Incentivized

It was very easy. Too many process maps may confuse your mind. You have to choose what you need

Incentivized

All software has some pros and some cons. Alfresco has some good pluses, and suits our environment very well. It fit perfectly in the place that we are working on. That is why we decided to go with this software. Overall, the kind of content management that needs to be done in an organization is what would determine which software to use.

Incentivized

1-Its price is more attractive than the others.2-Easy to use .The iGrafx is not complicated like the others3-The option to drag and drop objects is very good 4-I think it is the best tool to monitor daily performance used for making critical decision making

Incentivized

• Instant document lookup - No paper files to mail which saves in all areas of postage, truck delivery, physical storage warehouse space, printing, etc
• No longer losing important documents - Previously with paper files things would go missing and those could be costly reports/assessments.
• Ability to secure documents and provide access to only those who should be allowed to see that content

Incentivized

• Bad support from my experience
• Broad usability
• Easy to use
• Bad reporting in my opinion

Incentivized