TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Ibexa DXP

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AIbexa, headquartered in Oslo, helps B2B companies to stay relevant and succeed by transforming traditional sales strategies into frictionless buying experiences, with their eponymous digial experience platform (DXP).

    $20,143.81

    per year

    Paligo

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/APaligo is a component content management system (CCMS) that helps teams manage complex technical documentation through structured authoring, content reuse, and controlled publishing.

    $4,800

    per year per seat

    Pricing
    Ibexa DXPPaligo
    Editions & Modules
    Ibexa Content - Bronze
    € 15,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Bronze
    € 23,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Silver
    €26,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Bronze
    € 30,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Gold
    €37,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Silver
    €40,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Platinum
    €50,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Silver
    €52,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Gold
    €57,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Gold
    €74,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Platinum
    €77,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Platinum
    €100,000
    per year
    Professional
    from $4800
    per year
    Business
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Ibexa DXPPaligo
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Ibexa DXPPaligo
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Ibexa DXP and Paligo
    Feature
    Ibexa DXP
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Ibexa DXP and Paligo
    Feature
    Ibexa DXP
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    API7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Ibexa DXP and Paligo
    Feature
    Ibexa DXP
    5.4
    1 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    WYSIWYG editor7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Admin section7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Page templates3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Library of website themes2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publishing workflow8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form generator6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Ibexa DXP and Paligo
    Feature
    Ibexa DXP
    5.6
    1 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    Content taxonomy9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    SEO support5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bulk management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Community / comment management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Ibexa DXPPaligo
    Small Businesses
    Yext
    Score6.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Progress Sitefinity
    Score7.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Ibexa DXPPaligo
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    8.5
    (35 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    7.6
    (6 ratings)
    9.3
    (28 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.4
    (6 ratings)
    9.5
    (30 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    8.4
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Ibexa DXPPaligo
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Ibexa
    I always recommend Ibexa DXP to my fellows. The only scenario that I would not recommend it is if the site is either too small, too simple, or that they simply cannot afford to stand it up properly.
    Read full review
    Paligo
    One of the biggest strengths is the structured authoring, which not only gives clean content for users but is also well-suited for providing AI content. I also make good use of content reuse, which simplifies maintenance and documentation updates when features change. The taxonomy has allowed me to create versioned documentation on our site that correlates with customers' installed software versions. We're switching over to using the API for publishing to our website and that will be a nice switch from the publication structure we've used previously. The tool doesn't, at this time, allow me to connect it to a custom GPT or create one that would be based on our style guide. There also isn't an MCP server option to work better with my Claude configurations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Ibexa
    • Content Taxonomy: Content is managed in a tree. Though taxonomy vs folksonomy is a near-religious debate among professionals, clients seeing the system for the first time just seem to "get it" more often.
    • Content Flexibility: Common content types such as blog posts and articles are available out of the box. However, customizing these and creating new content types is very easy.
    • Developer Friendly: Developers need only a little PHP experience to get started. Of course being an expert doesn't hurt and opens the door for the development of custom modules.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    • The review mode is super convenient. Comparing a snapshot of the previous versions with the current one clearly outlines the respective changes and reduces the necessary content to review tremendously.
    • The option to reuse text fragments is another handy feature. Text fragments will be updated whenever the original text fragment is altered is also extremely helpful.
    • Managing a content's structure was never easier. An intuitive drag & drop functionality allows you to design your document's structure however you like.
    • You can also fork content, in addition to reuse text fragments. This is another helpful option that no longer requires you to create repetetive chapters over and over.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Ibexa
    • Limited partners when you compare to other solutions (WordPress, Drupal, etc). It took us a while to find a solid, trusted developer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    • The amount of CSS/JS required to customize a site's appearance can be cumbersome
    • Product documentation can be lacking, specifically with integrations; in some cases, support offered no real help when trying to solve a problem with an integrated service
    • Some features require extensive development experience to use, which can sometimes be an obstacle to less-experienced team members
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Ibexa
    Very happy with current relationship and websites
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    Paligo single-sources beautifully. Allows for customization. Has the best translation features. Has the best support services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Ibexa
    It is quite easy to navigate through the backend and also, you can directly work in frontend view. Dynamic content can be created on the fly. Their Landing page features are awesome. You create a page by drag & drop.
    Read full review
    Paligo
    Reuse feature was the main reason for selection Paligo. It is the most powerful feature for us as now we have only one source of content that is used in all other documents through reuse. Makes it very easy when we need to update the content (in some cases at least once a quarter) and batch publishing makes it very easy to publish 100s of documents in one click
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Ibexa
    They are directly reachable and help you to deal with other services, e.g. if would like to set up a CDN for China or if you would like to integrate a tool like HubSpot. If there is anything you are missing, they help you to find a workaround until they can deliver such items - like local language versions.
    Read full review
    Paligo
    All the support requests I've submitted have been resolved in one way or another. Sometimes it takes some back and forth, which is to be expected. This is where being on a different continent becomes a drawback. Since we became Enterprise users, we've also had an additional level of help and support from a dedicated account manager in the US, and the resolutions seem to come more quickly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Ibexa
    The partner selected makes a significant impact on the usability and experience
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    Everything went well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Ibexa
    eZ Publish isn't as large in community size and number of installations as other content management systems. However, it's just as capable and met our needs:
    • Developers, system administrators, and project manager can all speak the same language during the development and maintenance cycles of a site.
    • End-user training is very straight-forward.
    • Vendor support is available.
    • Client IT departments can access if need (developers/designers/sysadmins).
    • The community is there (forums) and there are solid contributions (extensions) from both the vendor and the community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    We moved from Flare to Paligo. One of the main reasons was the fact that Paligo is a cloud product. Collaboration with anyone outside of our team was more difficult with Flare. Also, maintaining a server for Flare content was going to become an issue, and overall I felt the Flare desktop product was prone to errors and issues. The flexibility of assigning Paligo licenses was a huge factor, as was the stability of the cloud platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Ibexa
    We’ve priced other enterprise products and found Ibexa DXP to be a bit more expensive. However, not enough to dissuade us from staying with the product.
    Read full review
    Paligo
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    Ibexa
    The partner ecosystem is small. However, we've worked with two Ibexa partners over the last 10 years. They were very skilled. They were great companies. We've interviewed other Ibexa partners in North America. We found them all to be professional with solid resumes.
    Read full review
    Paligo
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Ibexa
    • Common knowledge: By making eZ a core offering, developers, system administrators, and project managers were able to communicate with each other effectively.
    • Training: Due to its content taxonomy, end-user training often went well.
    • Support: In our case, we had Gold support from eZ Publish which saved time and helped with customizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    • I am not involved in the financial decisions for my company regarding Paligo; the decision to migrate our content to this environment predates my hiring. However, I know that the migration effort from WordPress to Paligo was an initially heavy lift, but any content migration effort would be. I believe that ultimately, getting our content out of WordPress was a positive move, and I look forward to seeing what Paligo will help us accomplish in the future. Sorry, no hard numbers from me. :)
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Paligo Screenshots

    Screenshot of branching in PaligoScreenshot of conditional filters in PaligoScreenshot of the contributor editor in PaligoScreenshot of some of the integration options in PaligoScreenshot of the main editor in PaligoScreenshot of multi-channel publishing options in Paligo