IBM Cloudability vs. Spot by NetApp

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloudability
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloudability is a cloud cost management and optimization (FinOps) tool that enables IT, finance, and business teams to optimize their cloud spend across all cost sources, all maturity levels, and for all stakeholders.N/A
Spot by NetApp
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Spot by NetApp, now including CloudCheckr, helps companies to run their cloud investments. The Spot product suite uses machine learning and analytics to automate and optimize cloud infrastructure, to ensure that workloads and applications always have the best possible infrastructure that is available, scalable and available at the lowest possible cost. Spot’s technology provides insights into cloud costs, recommendations for how to optimize utilization and costs, and automation to implement…N/A
Pricing
IBM CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Considered Both Products
IBM Cloudability
Chose IBM Cloudability
VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, Amazon QuickSight and Microsoft Power BI
Chose IBM Cloudability
I personally think Cloudability is great, but sells themselves short in some areas of functionality, or it may have the functionality but it's difficult to fully realize it as there are so many filters and ways to build a reports, also can the dashboards be shared easily into …
Chose IBM Cloudability
From the limited time that I've been there, I mean in the renewal talks it's been, I think Cloud Zero was another competitor that we were in talks with, but I'm not entirely sure what direction we're going. That's above my pay grade.
Chose IBM Cloudability
IBM Cloudability is more dense and scalable to meet other more comprehensive cloud focused business planning needs
Chose IBM Cloudability
we only use it to upload the data. that is all we use it for at this point but would love to see what else we could use it for.
Chose IBM Cloudability
Our organization chose IBM Cloudability over other products because, in our opinion, IBM Cloudability stacks up very well.
Chose IBM Cloudability
AWS Compute Optimizer, AWS Cost Explorer and AWS Trusted Advisor
Chose IBM Cloudability
Some of the advantages include: Better decision making: Evaluating Reserved Instance (RI) or Savings Plan Utilization
Detecting unexpected cost increases by drilling down into usage patterns and pinpointing the root cause (e.g., sudden EC2 scaling or S3 storage growth).
Chose IBM Cloudability
not using any similar products, but Cloudability is able to provide all necessary features and functionality for our organization and our customer to get the right information on their cloud spend. The ability to customize the dashboard is also a very useful feature. …
Chose IBM Cloudability
Turbo, cloud health
Value/ relationship with IBM
Chose IBM Cloudability
Our organization chose IBM Cloudability because, in our experience, Overall, IBM Cloudability is a better product.
Chose IBM Cloudability
For a single project and quick analysis about why my costs when overboard or why forecast is showing more than my budget, it is much easier to use AWS Cost Explorer over IBM Cloudability. I think this area should definitely improve and do some smart suggestions using AI …
Chose IBM Cloudability
IBM Cloudability stands out in the cloud cost management landscape due to its comprehensive features, strong multi-cloud support, and alignment with FinOps practices. Here's how it compares to other leading tools:
Chose IBM Cloudability
I believe that one complements the other, and it was great that Apptio brought them together on the same front.
Chose IBM Cloudability
Apptio Cloudability (pre-IBM acquisition), CloudHealth by VMware, AWS Cost Explorer, and Azure Cost Management. Each has its strengths, but Cloudability stood out for its multi-cloud coverage, commitment discount optimization, and finance-friendly reporting capabilities.
Chose IBM Cloudability
Recently, I got an opportunity to review this tool in the India Apptio User Conference. Currently, I'm going through the use cases of this tool and checking if this helps us in any of the use cases. also, I've heard from the speaker that IBM Kubecost will be integrated in the …
Chose IBM Cloudability
We tried a few different tools as part of a POC but the fact that there is the IBM name attached to Apptio and just the complexity of our enterprise systems was something that we felt was best served by the IBM Cloudability tool. It integrated seamlessly with the multiple cloud …
Chose IBM Cloudability
When we purchased they were close but we preferred some bits like forecasts
Chose IBM Cloudability
- Comprehensive cloud cost analytics- Effective cloud optimization tools- Strong multi-cloud management capabilities
Chose IBM Cloudability
IBM Cloudability does better on a lot of aspects. Still there are certain features that are exclusive to each product.
Spot by NetApp
Chose Spot by NetApp
We compared with Cloud Conformity and Staxx. They are all great products and have their pros and cons and we just felt for the price that CoudCheckr had everything we needed and seemed a bit more mature in the market. We review our position every year and can see that the …
Chose Spot by NetApp
There are a few products out there that'll do an aspect or two of what CloudCheckr does, but I honestly couldn't find anything nearly as comprehensive as CloudCheckr.
Chose Spot by NetApp
Cloudability boasts great visualizations but lacks the ability to customize reports and does not address any aspects of cloud management other than cost. CloudHealth is a viable competitor to CloudCheckr. CloudHealth does not have the breadth of reporting capabilities but …
Features
IBM CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloudability
-
Ratings
Spot by NetApp
9.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Cloud Management Security00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cost Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Systems Integration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.7 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
2.3
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Likelihood to Recommend
Good tool to start FinOps journey in a medium sized (or above) company. Currently missing AI capabilities that are now available with a lot of FinOps vendors in the market. Also, apptio currently does not have FOCUS dataset nomenclature, that can be worked upon.
Read full review
If you want to control the cost of your cloud infrastructure and adhere to the industry's security best practices, this is the best I've found. If you want to right-size your instances, this can provide a place to start, but there are other tools like https://www.metricly.com/ that might be better suited. For us, this was enough, and we couldn't justify the additional expense of another tool. But it's primary purpose is to control costs.
Read full review
Pros
  • It shows the visibility into the cost and a single pane of glass for all of our cloud providers, multiple products in those multi-cloud. So it shows us our spending across the cloud by vendor, by product, and by all the tags that we have in the cloud. So it gives us visibility into many different directions in our cost.
Read full review
  • Monitor costs and provide alerts when they deviate from normal usage.
  • Provide security best practices and alert on misconfigurations.
  • Monitor utilisation and recommend more appropriate instance sizes and reserved instance purchases.
  • Provide a single pane of glass view for multiple accounts in AWS.
Read full review
Cons
  • There is currently no ability to apply global filters over the data in cloudability. Rather users must go through a difficult process to create custom views which they are later able to apply over top of their datasets.
  • Drill functionality does not really exists but appears to be more of an after though add-on. Yes you are able to "drill" but the visuals disappear and even the ability to export the more detailed information.
Read full review
  • UI can be difficult to navigate. Given the amount of data, it's not surprising, but I often launch the different reports in multiple tabs so I don't get lost.
  • Can be expensive. Not in our case, but you probably want to check and make sure you'll see significant cost savings that'll pay for the product as we did.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cloudability has been one solution for almost all of our FinOps needs. Except for Data transfer costs, we have covered all use cases and have made significant savings across our cloud infrastructure. Reporting has provided management a deeper analysis into their spending and helped them forecast their budgets for next year
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
In terms of setting up the Apptio Cloud ability and configuring the Cloud Subscriptions and Accounts its very much clearly defined and also in terms of the User interface its very rich in terms of the navigation and look and feel factors its cool.
Read full review
Overall, CloudCheckr covers all our AWS monitoring needs and great integration through SysLog into our SIEM to capture alerts for investigation. The reports are great and allow for an easy daily review. Small improvements could be made to the interface and better filtering in places would be good. Great product and the price is fair.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Only been 1 or 2 occaisions when not available, in 3 years
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Afternoons tend to be a little slower, due to US traffic I assume
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
While there have been few support cases where the experience was good. But in multiple support cases it's firstly delayed and even after weeks or months of time, team is not able to provide us with the RCA of the issue. All they are claiming is the issue is now fixed which I still see coming back after few days or weeks as we've never identified and addressed the root cause.
Read full review
Fantastic Support team who are responsive and address question and concerns promptly with a thorough explanation and fast resolution.
Read full review
Online Training
Training was adequate, but the real learning begins when you start using the product, like most things. All major functions were covered so as an entry point, was a good introduction to the product. The training pace was good as well, the areas were covered in decent depth, without being too much of an information overload.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Within months
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
From the limited time that I've been there, I mean in the renewal talks it's been, I think Cloud Zero was another competitor that we were in talks with, but I'm not entirely sure what direction we're going. That's above my pay grade.
Read full review
We compared with Cloud Conformity and Staxx. They are all great products and have their pros and cons and we just felt for the price that CoudCheckr had everything we needed and seemed a bit more mature in the market. We review our position every year and can see that the other products are closing the gap as well.
Read full review
Scalability
Works as designed
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Has allowed for more Directors to be up to date with their Budget data and know where they are standing
  • Has saved thousands of dollars in that each agency does not have to pay for individual budget management.
  • Has saved hours of time by making the data easily uploadable instead of having to manually organize all the data.
Read full review
  • CloudCheckr has allowed us to increase resell margins as an MSP.
  • CloudCheckr has made us aware of cost savings opportunities that exceed the price of the platform itself.
  • CloudCheckr has given us additional visibility that has allowed us to manage and understand cloud computing costs.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cloudability Screenshots

Screenshot of ML backed rightsizing recommendations surfacing multiple scenarios with tools to help sort those that can me realistically actioned on, with Jira and ServiceNowScreenshot of an allocation of cloud viewed through the enterprise grade tools to tailor data for chargeback/showback across an organizationScreenshot of intelligent forecasting including seasonality, cost drivers and net new spendScreenshot of anomaly detection capabilities to stop issues in their tracks via the right people for the job