IBM Cognos Analytics vs. Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cognos Analytics
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.
$10
per month per user
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's PeopleSoft ERP (or PeopleSoft FSCM) is a software solution used to reduce costs by automating and centralizing global transactional processes and the enterprise entire supply chain. Oracle states they have extended support for PeopleSoft to 2034.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Editions & Modules
On Demand - Standard
USD 10.00
per month per user
On Demand - Premium
USD 42.40
per month per user
On Demand - Standard
USD 10.60
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Considered Both Products
IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos made it easy to request data that was needed. With PeopleSoft, our IT department needed to be involved/was required so that in-house programmers could design code and queries in order to be able to review the data. Excluding this extra step made productivity much …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics

Report Writer was innovative in its day but it was very basic. It was good at accessing multiple data points but it was weak in creating formulas and I don't think you could get graphs out of it.

Excel is very good even today. You can really manipulate data and create pretty …

Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos is definitely more robust as a reporting and analysis tool than PeopleSoft Human Capital Management, in my experience. PeopleSoft is primarily transaction-oriented, rather than data-driven.
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

No answer on this topic

Features
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle PeopleSoft ERP
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.6
130 Ratings
7% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports7.5120 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.7126 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.5122 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.5
130 Ratings
7% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis6.9127 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.7129 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.492 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.1123 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
8.2
128 Ratings
0% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
-
Ratings
Publish to Web8.327 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.7122 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.626 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.3124 Ratings00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.112 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.0
117 Ratings
13% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.6112 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.6107 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.5103 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.340 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.4
122 Ratings
14% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)7.2119 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.3118 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)6.7117 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.947 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.2101 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
6.4
102 Ratings
19% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access6.796 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.686 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.792 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.4
82 Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
-
Ratings
REST API7.279 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API7.476 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames8.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API6.911 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)7.110 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)7.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
20 Ratings
1% above category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings6.018 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings9.019 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
3.3
22 Ratings
77% below category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings3.321 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings3.318 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.0
29 Ratings
7% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings8.925 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.127 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.1
30 Ratings
18% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings6.026 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.628 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings4.728 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.5
33 Ratings
2% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings7.027 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings6.526 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.518 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings7.125 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings7.125 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings6.221 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings7.523 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.0
13 Ratings
1% above category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings8.912 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings8.912 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.2
10 Ratings
5% above category average
Pricing00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings7.96 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.6
29 Ratings
2% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings3.615 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings6.417 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings7.822 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
12 Ratings
2% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings8.710 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.3
9 Ratings
4% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings8.98 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.5
11 Ratings
25% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.7
18 Ratings
4% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings7.014 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.2
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.8
3 Ratings
25% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.1
5 Ratings
21% above category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings6.04 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings9.95 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings9.95 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings9.95 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.1
11 Ratings
24% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings8.911 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.910 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.6
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(146 ratings)
6.4
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.1
(30 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(9 ratings)
6.3
(6 ratings)
Availability
8.6
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(9 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(7 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
5.7
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
2.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Well suited: Financial reporting - It can handle complex, pixel perfect, muti-page reports with scheduled delivery to stakeholders (like sales report by region on quarterly periodicity) Operational dashboard across departments - It can combine multiple data sources (ERP, CRM, excels etc) with filters, and embedded AI insights Less appropriate: Live dashboards - As stated earlier as well, IBM Cognos Analytics doesn't suit well for live dashboards or event driven data. For ex: live web traffic data or IOT device data, etc Data science - Although IBM Cognos Analytics is great tool for data exploration but it should not be used as a substitute for Python or R, which has edge over advanced modelling and stats based workflows like predictive modelling or clustering
Read full review
Oracle
You really need a big enterprise to take advantage of PeopleSoft. It is not entirely user-friendly, and it often requires massive amounts of customization to make it work for layers if you will. Business experts can figure it out, but if you are expecting someone to easily learn how to use the timekeeping modules without heavy customization, it's really not for you. You need to know going in, that this is not for a small business at all, and not even a medium-sized enterprise. It's geared to massive organizations that need to integrate business processes over geographic areas and multiple departments.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • We can make dozens of dispatchers all focusing on different types of workloads.
  • Friendly user interface, without the need for coding or complicated editing.
  • Highly functionality reporting tools.
  • We can easily create trigger when a certain threshold are met sending reports or alerts to needed parties.
Read full review
Oracle
  • One of the best thing it does is it is customizable. You can implement any business logic you need. This is one of the very key assets of PeopleSoft Financials.
  • PeopleSoft Financials's accounting methods are in line with industry standards. You can use the process as is and ledger will be taken care of.
  • It supports multiple ways to integrate with other systems.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • IBM Cognos Analytics enables customer data segmentation, which is essential for marketing, improving and streamlining purchasing behavior and preferences. This helps companies create more targeted and effective marketing campaigns.
  • Our clients Through data analysis, we can identify and observe trends in the behavior of other clients, allowing us to anticipate needs and adjust strategies to avoid consequences.
Read full review
Oracle
  • PeopleSoft Financials does not address the needs of small organizations that do not have a large enough staff to maintain the software or utilize the features it provides as it requires a moderate staff to keep track of all of the transactions and processing
  • PeopleSoft licensing costs are significant, which are relative to the features provided but in many cases those features may not be necessary
  • PeopleSoft licensing structures can be frustrating at times when certain modules would allow you to perform the complex task needed but it would require the entire module to be licensed for just that one feature (e.g. Cash Management for loading bank statements in certain formats)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
Read full review
Oracle
PRISM is a great tool to track and watch numerous financial documents. I would like to see more of an integration platform that would control tracking for specific project details. There is currently only a little section for job notes which I would like to see improve. I think navigation could be improved, but isn't the worst compared to some platforms I have worked with as it provides a tree like structure on the backend which helps synchronize information together for fiscal financials.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
Read full review
Oracle
The usability is very outdated In my opinion. The screens resemble those of Windows 3.1. Too many clicks and drop-downs or clicks to go to a new screen. The business logic also appears dated and requires an update. Overall, it does not have a pleasing User Interface and should be refreshed, or a new interface should be built from the ground up.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
Read full review
Oracle
I can't give them a perfect rating because it does often take a long time and usually more [expensive] to resolve trying issues that cannot be solved by our in-house team. PeopleSoft is complicated, and the mix and match of user-created and stock modules cause problems very often. These usually require more customization to completely fix, requiring more money spent with
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
Read full review
Oracle
I recommend that everyone pay special attention to developing a solid testing and training plan if you are even thinking of implementing PeopleSoft. Be ready to obtain good trainers and developers, otherwise, your journey can be unnecessarily painful and much more expensive. Try to stay with an implementation partner who really has your needs at heart, and actually takes the time to understand your organization!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Power BI is stronger for quick ad-hoc analysis and dashboards, but IBM Cognos Analytics is better when consistency, precision, and mass distribution matter. Tableau is best for interactive analysis, while IBM Cognos Analytics is better for standardized, repeatable enterprise reporting. Sigma shines for customizable dashboards and drill-down analysis while IBM Cognos Analytics holds an edge in data discovery and visualization.
Read full review
Oracle
PeopleSoft is much more appropriate for large organizations than the software programs listed here. I'm involved in a project to bring billing and accounts receivable functions out of "shadow systems" like those listed here and into PeopleSoft, and PeopleSoft is more robust, flexible, and standardizable. We've found it to be an excellent solution.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
The Cognos architecture is well suited for scalability. However, the architecture must be designed with scalability in mind from day one of the implementation. We recently upgraded from 10.1 to 10.2.1 and took the opportunity to revamp our architecture. It is now poised for future growth and scalability.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • We use the tool for data modeling as it helps in predictive data analysis for complex data, which is very similar to real-life scenarios.
  • Options of customizing & scheduling reports as per our requirements basis.
  • Has mobile application which works seamless.
  • API integration is not upto the mark with very limited options.
  • Licensing & Maintenance can go from cheap to expensive depending on the scope.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Provides better controls to ensure that spend does not increase beyond the PO amount.
  • sPro reverse invoicing provides a mechanism to only pay our staff aug firms for only the hours that entered into PeopleSoft. There is no more reconciliation between the vendor invoices and the hours that were charged within the internal time tracking system.
  • PeopleSoft Financials increases employee efficiency through the use of dashboards and work centers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of a natural language query, used in IBM Cognos Analytics to get AI-powered insights from data.Screenshot of AI-generated insights and forecasts that can be added with just a click of a button.Screenshot of a dashboard that can be generated automatically using IBM Cognos Analytics by uploading or selecting data.Screenshot of an AI-generated dashboard from a spreadsheet that was just uploaded. This offers a great starting point for the creative process.Screenshot of where to import data to IBM Cognos Analytics from CSV files and spreadsheets. Users can connect to cloud or on-premises data sources, including SQL databases, Google BigQuery, Amazon, and Redshift.Screenshot of a sample operational dashboard of a coffee shop created using IBM Cognos Analytics.