IBM Db2 Big SQL vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Informatica Cloud Data Integration

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Db2 Big SQL
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM offers Db2 Big SQL, an enterprise grade hybrid ANSI-compliant SQL on Hadoop engine, delivering massively parallel processing (MPP) and advanced data query. Big SQL offers a single database connection or query for disparate sources such as HDFS, RDMS, NoSQL databases, object stores and WebHDFS.N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A
Informatica Cloud Data Integration
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Informatica Cloud Data Integration, for Cloud ETL and ELT, enables users to ingest, integrate and cleanse data within Informatica's cloud-native ETL and ELT solution. Users can link source and target data with thousands of connectors that recognize metadata, to make it easier to run complex integrations.N/A
Pricing
IBM Db2 Big SQLIBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data Integration
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Db2 Big SQLIBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data Integration
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Db2 Big SQLIBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data Integration
Features
IBM Db2 Big SQLIBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data Integration
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
IBM Db2 Big SQL
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.7
4 Ratings
6% above category average
Informatica Cloud Data Integration
10.0
2 Ratings
19% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings9.94 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings7.54 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
IBM Db2 Big SQL
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.6
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Informatica Cloud Data Integration
8.5
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings10.04 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings9.24 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Db2 Big SQL
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.0
4 Ratings
2% above category average
Informatica Cloud Data Integration
8.3
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Data model creation00 Ratings8.72 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings7.74 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings8.44 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings8.04 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings7.14 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Db2 Big SQL
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Informatica Cloud Data Integration
9.0
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings10.04 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings9.53 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Db2 Big SQLIBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data Integration
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
dbt
dbt
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.2 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Db2 Big SQLIBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data Integration
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.9
(5 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Db2 Big SQLIBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data Integration
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
My recommendation obviously would depend on the application. But I think given the right requirements, IBM DB2 Big SQL is definitely a contender for a database platform. Especially when disparate data and multiple data stores are involved. I like the fact I can use the product to federate my data and make it look like it's all in one place. The engine is high performance and if you desire to use Hadoop, this could be your platform.
Read full review
IBM
Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
Read full review
Informatica
We use it a lot for importing data. We transform the incoming data to match the formatting of our CRM. We also match on existing records to avoid creating duplicates. Informatica handles all of this exceptionally well. Our users are system administrators. The tool is not well-suited for users who do not have a technical background
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • data storage
  • data manipulation
  • data definitions
  • data reliability
Read full review
IBM
  • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
  • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
  • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
Read full review
Informatica
  • Data synchronisation
  • Data replication
  • Data integration
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Cloud readiness.
  • Ease of implementation.
Read full review
IBM
  • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
  • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
  • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
Read full review
Informatica
  • There is a moderately steep learning curve
  • Has some idiosyncrasies
  • Can be finicky with date formats
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Scale of implementation
  • IBM techsupport
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
IBM DB2 is a solid service but hasn't seen much innovation over the past decade. It gets the job done and supports our IT operations across digital so it is fair.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Informatica
There is a learning curve with Informatica. It is not always intuitive to use. It is best suited for technical users such as system administrators
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
IBM did a good job of supporting us during our evaluation and proof of concept. They were able to provide all necessary guidance, answer questions, help us architect it, etc. We were pleased with the support provided by the vendor. I will caveat and say this support was all before the sale, however, we have a ton of IBM products and they provide the same high level of support for all of them. I didn't see this being any different. I give IBM support two thumbs up!
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
MS SQL Server was ruled out given we didn't feel we could collapse environments. We thought of MS-SQL as more of a one for one replacement for Sybase ASE, i.e., server for server. SAP HANA was evaluated and given a big thumbs up but was rejected because the SQL would have to be rewritten at the time (now they have an accelerator so you don't have to). Also, there was a very low adoption rate within the enterprise. IBM DB2 Big SQL was not selected even though technically it achieved high scores, because we could not find readily available talent and low adoption rate within the enterprise (basically no adoption at the time). We ended up selecting Exadata because of the high adoption rate within the enterprise even though technically HANA and Big SQL were superior in our evaluations.
Read full review
IBM
DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
Read full review
Informatica
It is really easy to comply and understand its features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • better data visibility
  • solid reliability for mission critical data
Read full review
IBM
  • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
  • Better documentation and governance.
  • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
Read full review
Informatica
  • Really greatest than any other conventional application.
Read full review
ScreenShots