IBM MQ vs. Salesforce Agentforce Commerce

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM MQ
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM MQ (formerly WebSphere MQ and MQSeries) is messaging middleware.N/A
Agentforce Commerce
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce (formerly Commerce Cloud, and Demandware before that) is a cloud-based eCommerce solution for enterprises with merchandising tools, such as sorting, filtering, and image zooming, allowing customers to browse products.
$4
per month
Pricing
IBM MQSalesforce Agentforce Commerce
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM MQAgentforce Commerce
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsB2B Commerce: Starter - $4 price/order Growth - $6 price/order Plus - $8 price/order B2C Commerce: Starter - 1% Gross Merchandise Value Growth - 2% Gross Merchandise Value Plus - 3% Gross Merchandise Value B2B2C Commerce: 1% Gross Merchandise Value
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM MQSalesforce Agentforce Commerce
Considered Both Products
IBM MQ
Chose IBM MQ
Both are useful in their own right and we actually use IBM MQ together with PCWP. IBM MQ automates our tasks and saves a lot of tedious work we would otherwise have to do manually.
Agentforce Commerce

No answer on this topic

Features
IBM MQSalesforce Agentforce Commerce
Online Storefront
Comparison of Online Storefront features of Product A and Product B
IBM MQ
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
8.7
44 Ratings
11% above category average
Product catalog & listings00 Ratings9.139 Ratings
Product management00 Ratings9.239 Ratings
Bulk product upload00 Ratings7.938 Ratings
Branding00 Ratings8.839 Ratings
Mobile storefront00 Ratings9.035 Ratings
Product variations00 Ratings9.041 Ratings
Website integration00 Ratings8.339 Ratings
Visual customization00 Ratings7.840 Ratings
CMS00 Ratings9.237 Ratings
Online Shopping Cart
Comparison of Online Shopping Cart features of Product A and Product B
IBM MQ
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
8.7
34 Ratings
13% above category average
Abandoned cart recovery00 Ratings8.528 Ratings
Checkout user experience00 Ratings8.934 Ratings
Online Payment System
Comparison of Online Payment System features of Product A and Product B
IBM MQ
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
9.1
33 Ratings
9% above category average
eCommerce security00 Ratings9.133 Ratings
eCommerce Marketing
Comparison of eCommerce Marketing features of Product A and Product B
IBM MQ
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
8.1
38 Ratings
5% above category average
Promotions & discounts00 Ratings8.536 Ratings
Personalized recommendations00 Ratings7.938 Ratings
SEO00 Ratings7.933 Ratings
eCommerce Business Management
Comparison of eCommerce Business Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM MQ
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
9.0
41 Ratings
12% above category average
Multi-site management00 Ratings9.035 Ratings
Order processing00 Ratings8.738 Ratings
Inventory management00 Ratings9.037 Ratings
Shipping00 Ratings9.330 Ratings
Custom functionality00 Ratings9.138 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM MQSalesforce Agentforce Commerce
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Ecwid by Lightspeed
Ecwid by Lightspeed
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.7 out of 10
Shopify Plus
Shopify Plus
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.7 out of 10
IBM Digital Commerce
IBM Digital Commerce
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM MQSalesforce Agentforce Commerce
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(47 ratings)
8.5
(55 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(1 ratings)
7.8
(11 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(6 ratings)
9.0
(11 ratings)
Availability
9.5
(29 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(27 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM MQSalesforce Agentforce Commerce
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
In the context of Internet of Things (IoT) applications, IBM MQ plays a pivotal role in managing the substantial data streams emanating from interconnected devices. Its primary function is to guarantee the dependable transmission and processing of data, catering to a diverse range of IoT use cases, including but not limited to smart city initiatives, healthcare monitoring systems, and industrial automation solutions. In the telecommunications sector, IBM MQ is employed for message routing, call detail record (CDR) processing, and network management to ensure real-time data exchange and fault tolerance. When managing the supply chain and logistics, IBM MQ is used to ensure timely and accurate communication between different entities, including suppliers, warehouses, and transportation providers. IBM MQ can be cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations due to licensing and maintenance costs. In such cases, open-source or lightweight messaging solutions may be more appropriate. For scenarios requiring extremely low-latency, real-time data exchange, and high throughput, other messaging technologies, like Apache Kafka, may be more suitable due to their specialized design for such use cases.
Read full review
Salesforce
Global Sites; larger commerce organizations but not too large where the % rev-share would affect its feasibility in a feature comparison. Salesforce is rock solid in infrastructure and rarely has outages or issues; it scaled appropriately for holiday peak and was able to accomplish anything we put our minds to as long as we staffed development appropriately. The latter, however, is not to be overlooked. Developers are necessary and expensive.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • The documentation is very clear,It is understandable and the support helps to configure it in the best way.
  • Server guidelines make it possible to get the most out of work management. It's broad, we can work with different operating systems, I really recommend using linux.
  • It is highly compatible with systems, brockers, applications, and data accumulation programs, it is possible to configure everything so that after the installation of programs, they can communicate with each other and then throw data to an external program that accumulates it and represents in clear details of steps to follow and make business decisions.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Traffic - When we have sales, our traffic will increase exponentially and their cloud can handle the huge uptick in traffic we receive without overloading our servers.
  • Site updates - it continually monitors in the background for any upgrades or updates needed so we don't have to go in and do it ourselves. A real time saver!
  • Integration - outside plugins and add-ons are easy to install with Salesforce commerce cloud as it allows a seamless integration of extra plug ins onto our site.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • There is limitation on number of svrconn connections you can have to MQ on the mainframe which has been an major issue for us. This has been an issue for us for over 4 years and still no fix although I am aware IBM have been working on a solution over the last year.
  • When upgrading to MQ V9.3 on our MQ appliances there is no fall-back option. This was the same for MQ V9.2 upgrade from MQ V9.0. For production upgrades this I believe is not acceptable.
  • AMS is not supplied as part of the standard mainframe MQ licence. You need an extra licence. IBM tell customers how important security and protecting data is yet they still want to charge for this software. The cost of MQ on the mainframe is not cheap so I would expect AMS to be part of the base product.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • The UX within the Business Manager portion of Demandware, the primary interface for marketers, is generally a confusing, inconsistent mess. Particularly infuriating are the lack of consistency for search and sort behavior within the tool.
  • A number of useful features, such as the ability to set schedules or tie features to unique customer segments, have seemingly arbitrary limitations imposed.
  • Demandware's idea of leveraging the community to be a learning resource and a sounding board for new ideas and features is a nice theory, but in practice it doesn't work for businesses with a lot of customization. I'm left with the impression that individual support is not a priority.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
A huge factor influencing our decision to remain on the Demandware platform is that our new parent company is standardizing all its luxury brands in the US on it. We are fortunate. However, even if we had remained an independent company, I believe we would continue on the Demandware platform for all the reasons outlined in this review. I appreciate the stability the platform has provided to our eCommerce site in the last three years as well as the continuous improvements and technological advances being rolled out that will allow us to keep the site fresh, engaging, modern and stable. I've heard many horror stories from colleagues on other platforms who struggle with the expense and complexity involved with making what should be minor and simple changes and updates to their sites.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
I give it a nine because it has significantly improved my team's data reliability and operational efficiency. Its great security features give us peace of mind, knowing our sensitive data is well protected. While the setup might initially be complex, I believe the long-term benefits far outweigh this hurdle.
Read full review
Salesforce
The overall ease of using the system. Consolidation in location for our team members. Mobile application for on the go research, as many of our team members are constantly traveling to job sites or to meet clients. No more duplicate calls to current customers, since we have 12 different divisions that span the company. Mostly the ability to look at the database when our team members begin cultivating a new
lead/prospect with a potential customer to see if anyone within the team has a
relationship with that person or the company they work for.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
The messages are delivered instantly with this software and it integrates with our technology stack, in terms of availability we only had one failure when we were doing some testing and integration with third parties, the features of this software make it always available and its deployment is easy for the company, it does not generate expenses due to failures
Read full review
Salesforce
We have only had one instance where the platform went down in the time we have been using it.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
There are very specific things that must be elevated to more specialized areas of support, but the common support is very agile when receiving questions or when we leave concerns in real time. I recommend the support of the program in this regard.
Read full review
Salesforce
They are very responsive and a support technician will be assigned quickly. Even if there is further clarification needed for the ticket, or a solution is not immediately available, you feel that someone is there and staying on top of the issue. Most common issues are resolved quickly and satisfactorily.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
The in-person training was thorough. Trainer was pretty dry, but covered everything really well.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
Implementation went fairly smoothly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
We found IBM MQ very easy to get started and quick to learn by the new users with a short learning curve and seamlessly integrates with IBM products, and quick to perform self-service analytics and make informed business decisions. IBM MQ is also very straightforward in creating simple and best reports, which are very profitable and productive.
Read full review
Salesforce
When I think of Salesforce products, I sometimes think of them interchangeably as one big lump. It's hard not to be incredibly immersed in the ecosystem day in and day out and taking advantage of resources like Trailhead. While Microsoft Dynamics compares in quality and offerings, it doesn't offer the same engagement and resources as Salesforce in its communications, social, and marketing, which makes a difference in terms of relevance and help. Commerce Cloud comes with the support you need to succeed and the tools you need to grow. In a high demand consumer world, we need products like this to keep up and get ahead. The minute we catch up, we're behind. Salesforce helps you stay on pace and create the unique and personalized experiences customers everywhere expect.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Positive- Message Reliability and Reduced downtime, increases the ROI many times.
  • Positive- Increased stability and enhanced customer experience
  • Negative- cost is very high - Both licensing and integration cost
  • Negative- Learning and training cost of IBM MQ is high as its complex to use and integrate
Read full review
Salesforce
  • In my experience I see most of the retailers see better sales after moving to Demandware.
  • Site performance is really good if the application built with best practices suggested by Demandware.
  • Service integrations have some limitations in terms of quota etc but still all are inside manageable grounds.
Read full review
ScreenShots