IBM Planning Analytics vs. Quantrix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Quantrix
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Quantrix is designed to allow users to address the limitations and risks inherent to spreadsheets when developing business-critical models. According to the vendor, this solution offers unmatched capability for forecasting, planning, budgeting, risk modeling and visual analytics, and also allows users to develop ‘what if’ scenarios and model the financial and operational impact of business decisions. Additionally, the vendor says sharing insight is made easier through the creation of interactive…N/A
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsQuantrix
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsQuantrix
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsQuantrix Modeler is licensed on a per user subscription basis.
More Pricing Information
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsQuantrix
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.8
81 Ratings
10% above category average
Quantrix
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports8.472 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.381 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates8.976 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.8
86 Ratings
6% above category average
Quantrix
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis9.384 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.385 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.565 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.982 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
84 Ratings
2% above category average
Quantrix
-
Ratings
Publish to Web7.879 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.378 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.378 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.669 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.9
84 Ratings
4% above category average
Quantrix
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.384 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.179 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.675 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.1
87 Ratings
5% above category average
Quantrix
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)9.685 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.686 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.687 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.712 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.281 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.4
77 Ratings
8% below category average
Quantrix
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access7.476 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.941 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.950 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.3
91 Ratings
11% above category average
Quantrix
9.3
12 Ratings
11% above category average
Long-term financial planning9.589 Ratings9.711 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.591 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Forecasting9.591 Ratings10.012 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.590 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Management reporting8.790 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.5
85 Ratings
6% above category average
Quantrix
8.0
7 Ratings
0% below category average
Financial data consolidation9.381 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Journal entries and reports8.376 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.875 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.575 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership6.768 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting9.578 Ratings8.77 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.280 Ratings6.75 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
86 Ratings
6% above category average
Quantrix
9.0
12 Ratings
9% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting9.482 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Management Reporting8.883 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.585 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting8.875 Ratings9.011 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.854 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.1
87 Ratings
12% above category average
Quantrix
8.5
12 Ratings
5% above category average
Personalized dashboards9.386 Ratings8.012 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards9.382 Ratings6.45 Ratings
KPIs9.385 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.485 Ratings8.610 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting9.484 Ratings10.011 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data7.958 Ratings8.210 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.8
87 Ratings
6% above category average
Quantrix
9.0
12 Ratings
8% above category average
Flat file integration8.984 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Excel data integration9.585 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.177 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsQuantrix
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.7 out of 10
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsQuantrix
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(97 ratings)
7.0
(12 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(62 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(87 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsQuantrix
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
I would be likely to recommend IBM Planning Analytics, particularly in scenarios where comprehensive financial and operational planning is essential. For instance, in our construction company, it is awesome for optimizing resource allocation across multiple projects, creating detailed project budgets, and conducting risk analysis to mitigate project uncertainties.
Read full review
Quantrix
If you find yourself in the ocean of traditional spreadsheets, overwhelmed by broken links, errors, model audit problems, hardwiring, etc. here is a lifebuoy for you. If you want to have full flexibility in your budgeting and forecasting in contrast to ERPs with rigid structures and one-size-fits-all concept. If you are small or medium size company and do not want to invest in costly enterprise solutions. If you need a fast implementation https://youtu.be/5W_q5Xhw5fg
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Forecasting after taking into account seasonal trends and exceptional transactions
  • Unlike spreadsheets, there is no fear of an user making changes to the mastercopy accidentally. Each user gets his or her own workspace to analyze.
  • For entities operating in multiple countries, connects seamlessly with IBM Cognos Controller for taking into account variation in currencies
Read full review
Quantrix
  • Building complex financial planning model availing of a multidimensional data structure coupled with a powerful formula language, with the immediacy and intuitiveness typical of spreadsheets
  • Implement quickly model modifications (new products, new scenarios, new time periods) simply adding new "items" to "categories" (corresponding to dimensions in a multidimensional data model)
  • Scale up models to very large datasets with very fast computation times
  • Easily import data from text files, other Quantrix models and external databases via DataLink and DataNAV
  • Save snapshots of tables computed in Quantrix to external databases via DataPush
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • IBM Planning Analytics was an upgrade from an older version of TM1 that is experiencing some growing pains, some functionality is harder to reach than it has been in the past
  • It is easy to learn as a surface user with created reports, but it does require some technical skills to make advanced calculations and reports if there is no reliable consultant available, much like Excel
Read full review
Quantrix
  • Hard to be critical of the Quantrix team as I know they strive to produce the best product possible. I suppose the next thing on my wish list would be the application of the new Solver functionality to be available in the Qloud.
  • A big help for new users would be a good book on transitioning from Excel or other environment into Quantrix. I know first hand it can be difficult to transition when having to learn the program through a help guide, forums and tech support. I had a lot of trial and error in my journey to producing the desired models. On one hand it was a valuable method as it taught me a lot of what not to do, but I will admit it was not the most efficient way to do things.
  • Would also love to see local user groups being formed at some point in the future. Quantrix puts on a fantastic conference once a year in beautiful Maine, but it is a big journey for someone in Southern California (and limited to one or two days a year). I would like to see some local chapters formed in different areas of the country so local Quantrix users can get together more often and collaborate (maybe a quarterly or semi-annual meetup?). Our Quantrix community is still relatively small and may be a difficult task for some areas, but is also the very reason why this would be great idea.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Quantrix
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
For developers, admins and end users looking for flexibility, IBM Planning Analytics would rate very highly on usability. For example, a developer has access to a highly performant built-in ETL (Extract Translate Load) tool and scripting language called Turbo Integrator that can (among other things) bring in data via flat file or direct connection from many data sources, move data around Planning Analytics, perform batch calculations, export to files or other data stores. In the rare situation where limitations are encountered there is a well documented REST API. Admins and end users benefit from the intuitive PAW (Workspace) interface as well as the rich Excel integration through Planning Analytics for Excel (PAfE). Since flexibility inherently comes with a little more complexity, so an organization with simple and "cookie-cutter" requirements may rate Planning Analytics a little lower.
Read full review
Quantrix
For a newbie it can be difficult until you get the hang of the system. Quantrix is a very logical system, once you understand its underlying ideas.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
Quantrix
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Anaplan does not handle sparsity; this is very problematic for large volume data sets (many 0's). There also are limitations to the number of dimensions that can be used in a module. If more dimensions are required, then separate modules need to be built and intertwined. IBM PA does not have these limitations.
Read full review
Quantrix
Overall, I was not part of the ultimate decision to purchase Quantrix. I terms of user-friendliess and robust reporting capabilities I do think Tableau has Quantrix outclassed. That being said, Quantrix does provide more in-depth analyses for our relevant data and provides better modeling for our forecasts out of the box. The accuracy of the tools output is also much better
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • One of the advantage is on its ability to ease budget and planning
  • Secondly,the fact that it allows for forecasting means based on such insights means that organisations are able to prepare for future eventualities
  • Thirdly, since it can accommodate data from multiple sources means that one is able to carry out best business practices like planning.
Read full review
Quantrix
  • Capacity forecasting used to take hours to calculate with a ton of manual modifications. Quantrix has automated that so a model can be updated at any time with a click of a button
  • The accuracy of the models is incredible. It took some tweaking to add in data scubbers, but now it runs almost flawlessly
  • The confidence the management teams have in the output of the model is amazing. Before, people would question the output, have you rebuild it, and then compare. Now the report comes out and the output has high confidence.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

Quantrix Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of