IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
Symantec Endpoint Security | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Symantec Endpoint Protection is the company's flagship antivirus / endpoint security product. | $29.99 per year 100-249 devices |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Symantec Endpoint Security | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Symantec Endpoint Security | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | 83% Would buy again 20 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 91% Delivers good value for the price 20 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | 92% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | 96% Implementation went as expected 23 Answers | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Symantec Endpoint Security | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Symantec Endpoint Security | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Symantec Endpoint Security | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Availability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 1.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 6.4 |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Symantec Endpoint Security | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |










