IBM SevOne vs. Pulseway
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM SevOne | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM SevOne’s app-centric, hybrid network observability empowers NetOps teams with ML-driven insights, enabling proactive issue prevention and resolution. With a single source of truth for network performance, it delivers visibility to optimize operations and support agility in complex, multi-cloud environments. | N/A |
Pulseway | Score7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Pulseway is an IT monitoring and management solution that enables users to monitor, manage and control all systems and servers from a smartphone, tablet or browser. For system administrators, Pulseway sends a notification, so they can see an issue and sort it in seconds. Pulseway features: Automation: Auto-remediation workflows, so that IT issues are fixed before users even notice them. Mobile Access: Customers can monitor, manage, connect with… | $0.80 per month per installation |
| IBM SevOne | Pulseway | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | IBM® SevOne® uses Managed Device (MD) and Managed Client Device (MCD) as pricing metrics. These can be mapped to managed devices for physical, virtualized and containerized functions in the managed environment. | No hidden fees or contracts. Term-based discounts. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 15 Answers | 60% Would buy again 3 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 15 Answers | 80% Happy with the feature set 4 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| IBM SevOne | Pulseway | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 | Panda Systems Management Score7.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 | N-able N-sight RMM Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM SevOne | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.7 | 6.4 |
| Usability | - | 7.8 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.6 |
| IBM SevOne | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM SevOne Screenshots | Pulseway Screenshots |















