Ideagen Collaboration Portal , formerly Huddle is Ideagen’s tool supporting teams' work by enabling them to store, share and work on content.
$10
per user/per month
Quip
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Quip is a collaboration tool, from Salesforce, that helps sales teams accelerate business in real-time with embedded documents, live Salesforce data, and other built-in collaboration features.
$120
per year per user
Pricing
Ideagen Collaboration Portal
Quip
Editions & Modules
Huddle
$10
per user/per month
Huddle Plus
Contact sales team
Huddle Premier
Contact sales team
Enterprise
$25
per user per month
Starter
$120
per year per user
Plus
$300
per year per user
Advanced
$1,200
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ideagen Collaboration Portal
Quip
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
All editions include unlimited personal documents and folders and a custom subdomain. Paid versions include unlimited document revision history, message archive and group sharing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ideagen Collaboration Portal
Quip
Features
Ideagen Collaboration Portal
Quip
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Ideagen Collaboration Portal
7.2
6 Ratings
8% below category average
Quip
8.1
37 Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management
9.26 Ratings
8.535 Ratings
Gantt Charts
9.01 Ratings
8.021 Ratings
Scheduling
4.53 Ratings
7.524 Ratings
Workflow Automation
4.52 Ratings
7.622 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.56 Ratings
7.632 Ratings
Search
6.66 Ratings
9.534 Ratings
Visual planning tools
10.01 Ratings
8.127 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Ideagen Collaboration Portal
8.8
5 Ratings
9% above category average
Quip
7.8
37 Ratings
3% below category average
Chat
10.03 Ratings
7.536 Ratings
Notifications
4.54 Ratings
8.535 Ratings
Discussions
9.03 Ratings
8.536 Ratings
Surveys
9.01 Ratings
7.121 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
10.04 Ratings
9.526 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
9.01 Ratings
6.110 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
10.01 Ratings
6.112 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
9.02 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
If you are sharing private information like contracts for designs and designs that aren't meant to be shared only with one client, the platform is very secure
I think collaboration is probably the best use case for it allows really good drafts of documents. I think it's really good use case if you want to go track edits to documents as well. It's probably not really good for versioning control, but it's definitely, it's very, very lightweight and so you can use it on a mobile device, you can use it in any web browser. So it's very easy to use, very easily accessible. I probably wouldn't use it from a spreadsheet perspective. Well I think some of the primary functions of data sheets are there. It doesn't have some of the more complex formulas that you would typically get from Excel or something like that
Huddle allows users to use the native document file types. For example, Word files are still in a Word, not a "Huddle" file version.
Huddle workspaces are invitation-only. If someone should not be in the workspace, they will not be invited and provided access to the documents. Or, they can be removed from the workspace if needed.
Communication about documents is located with the documents in a discussion thread under the document preview. Thus, email inbox clutter can be limited.
The desktop app is occasionally unreliable and it is never easy to get to the bottom of it with the tech support people...
Tasks are virtually useless as they have no context. We want tasks to be against documents so we can make our workflow more formal but they are not, so we don't use them. A reimplementation of to do and calendar facilities with files/documents as the context would make a huge difference to us.
The Huddle Office plugins are a great idea, but they cause us far too many Word and Excel crashes so we have to turn them off.
When using Quip Desktop, it can be slow to update with content from other users
I think it would be cool to have a PDF proofing system integrated into Quip. Once copy has gone to design, we are basically done using Quip - I'd like to bring that all together within Quip
Multi -select and group export of documents would be helpful
Huddle is very easy to use whether you are a new user or you have used it for years, it is an incredibly intuitive system that is so simple to teach to new users, the lock feature prevents important documents from being edited accidentally, while the edit features allow for true collaborative working
It is the best collaboration tool in my company. Through it, the organization has achieved better connectivity and efficiency in its communication. Primarily, the docs feature of this software is the most utilized in the company. Slowly, dash-boarding and project management features have also been utilized. Generally, it is the best tool, very easy and fairly streamlined
I have never used Quip's support. To be fair, we hired someone who used to work for Quip before working at our company, and he implemented it and pushed it with the team. He was very biased toward the product, and yes it was better than Google Drive, but by how much?
Google Drive is an obvious choice for a collaboration suite, but it still has this old-fashioned Windows 95 feel to it, with the standard file system hierarchy and spread-sheet like lists of files. Quip has a fresh take on the user interface, and the comments and discussion on a given file or line within a file seems more integrated and seamless, rather than a bunch of boxes out in the margin away from where you're actually reading and working. Having everything just to the left of a list or paragraph makes it easier to focus and maintain context while you're working or discussing a certain point.
It is a tool that allows work teams to move forward in a centralized way and meet their objectives as efficiently as possible; this has allowed us to meet our customers and brought more work to the organization, therefore more revenue; I would say that the ROI was fast enough, as expected.