IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score4.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
4.8
3 Ratings
44% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Pay calculation
8.03 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.43 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.43 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
7% below category average
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
33% below category average
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.85 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards
8.55 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Standard reports
8.35 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Custom reports
9.55 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
9.55 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.55 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.34 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.04 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.84 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
Inventory tracking
9.35 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.55 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Location management
9.55 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Pricing
9.05 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Order entry
8.25 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.74 Ratings
3.09 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.35 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.84 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
8.34 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.84 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.84 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.84 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Period Close
9.34 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
22% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.54 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.54 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.54 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.54 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
9.32 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.33 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.33 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.33 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.24 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.24 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Risk Repository
8.54 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.54 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.54 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.04 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.32 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.02 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.02 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.73 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.54 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Production Process Design
9.33 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Production Management
9.04 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.84 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Work Execution
9.34 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.54 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
22% above category average
Forecasting
8.84 Ratings
9.95 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.54 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info