TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IFS Applications vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IFS Applications

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AIFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A

    Microsoft Dynamics SL

    Score5.1 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A

    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AOracle Fusion Cloud PLM is a collaborative platform that helps users bring product ideas to market faster by standardizing and structuring the data and processes that go into innovating, developing, and commercializing products and services. It includes the capabilities of the former Agile Software Corporation, acquired by Oracle in 2007.N/A
    Pricing
    IFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Considered Multiple Products
    IFS
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    IFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    3 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation8.13 Ratings9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration7.43 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files6.43 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    6 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration8.85 Ratings6.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins8.85 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.9
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.7
    10 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings7.49 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.85 Ratings10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.0
    10 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.55 Ratings8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports8.35 Ratings8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.55 Ratings8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.5
    5 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    7.1
    11 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable9.55 Ratings6.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable9.55 Ratings6.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.34 Ratings6.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations9.04 Ratings3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting8.84 Ratings8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    5 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    5.7
    6 Ratings
    33% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking9.35 Ratings5.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic reordering9.55 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management9.55 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.3
    5 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.2
    4 Ratings
    24% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing9.05 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry8.25 Ratings3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing8.74 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold8.35 Ratings7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Orchestration7.84 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.9
    4 Ratings
    64% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    5.7
    4 Ratings
    28% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management8.34 Ratings6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management8.84 Ratings7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management8.84 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.84 Ratings6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close9.34 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    2.7
    1 Ratings
    95% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    4.7
    3 Ratings
    47% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Costing6.01 Ratings6.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost Capture5.01 Ratings2.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Execution Management
    Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Project Planning and Scheduling9.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Task Insight for Project Managers8.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Mobile Functionality7.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Definable Resource Pools8.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.3
    1 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Award Lifecycle Management9.32 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Bids Analyzed and Compared9.43 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Authoring8.43 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Repository8.43 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supplier Management9.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Risk Management
    Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    5.0
    4 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Risk Repository8.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Efficiency Assessments8.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Detection7.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remediation and Certification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Transportation Planning and Optimization8.42 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Transportation Execution Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management7.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Warehouse Workforce Management8.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Production Process Design9.33 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Production Management9.04 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Work Execution9.34 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs9.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting8.84 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Planning9.54 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    4 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    -
    Ratings
    Proposal Management8.33 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Master Data Management8.83 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Arena PLM and QMS
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    SAP Integrated Product Development
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    5.0
    (18 ratings)
    8.0
    (18 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.4
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    3.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud PLM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IFS
    Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    We use Oracle Product Hub Cloud to manage our supply chain and increase productivity. This is an awesome tool to manage our customer database and reduce unwanted costs of product management and shipping. The way this tool is designed is really amazing because we can create a product easily and we can streamline ERP and our supply chain.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IFS
    • It supports the web version in most later versions.
    • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
    • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
    • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
    • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
    • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
    • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
    • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
    • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
    • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Products and requirements are growing more complex than ever. Oracle's Agile Product Lifecycle Management helps you innovate profitably, with the broadest and most comprehensive solution to efficiently centralize product data, streamline processes, and launch quality products faster. Agile PLM is a strategic approach to managing the lifestyle of a product throughout its full value chain from initial requirements gathering through to design, prototyping, obtaining certification, product customization, service and retirement. Agile PLM emphasizes process efficiency, cross-functional collaboration in the extended enterprise, rapid innovation, rigorous quality control, risk mitigation, and cost-effectiveness.
    • The aspects that I like of Oracle Agile Project Management is that it helps foster collaboration between internal team members and vendors. All of our processes are documented on the platform, and the platform helps increase accountability across all internal teams. Collaboration is great in this tool.
    • Oracle Agile is a good product lifecycle management (PLM) software tool/database. Oracle Agile PLS is overall and for the most part, easy to use and has the ability to be customized and is able to provide visibility into the data that was entered into the database. This tool allows cross-functional teams to work on the same task at the same time, which is great when working remotely and/or working on an all remote team. Overall, this tool helped to accelerate product review, approval, and ultimately launch of new materials, therefore maximizing profitability and enhance product features and design as needed. The database is easy to use and does not require much training for someone who is technically savvy with other similar databases, and/or have used them in the past.
    • There lots of functionality and features in this product which gives you, as a company, great benefits to be able to manage your products portfolio. Easy to document products and have a way of looking up a product history and quality issues in the past. Better teamwork with pair engineering and co-located teams. Less documentation to restrict creativity, less time spent doing blind research, testing and feedback speeds up learning, and smaller more rapid improvements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IFS
    • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
    • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
    • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Agile PLM does not let us keep workloads properly balanced if we want to use more than one virtual network (VCN, specifically), forcing us to work with a single network in which we manage the different levels of the work infrastructure. Although this is a drawback, it has helped us to adapt to more centralized methodologies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IFS
    The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IFS
    We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IFS
    IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    While considering oracle Product Hub Cloud, the most thing which attracted me toward it is that it provides a single, Best in class data management to deliver master product record that threads business process including cross chain compliance product introductions although it hasn't built a cloud product that the general market is looking for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IFS
    • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
    • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
    • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
    • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
    • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • It is quite expensive to maintain the program and ask for technical support from an outside vendor.
    • It was better than the older system to handle records, just not training.
    • It would be more cost and time effective to improve the system rather than move onto a new one.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IFS Applications Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot