Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. NGINX Plus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) is based on technology acquired with Incapsula and the former WebSphere WAF.N/A
NGINX Plus
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Plus is presented as a cloud‑native, easy-to-use reverse proxy, load balancer, and API gateway, from F5.
$849
per month billed annually
Pricing
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)NGINX Plus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$849
per month billed annually
Advanced
$2,099
per month billed annually
Enterprise
Tiered Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)NGINX Plus
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)NGINX Plus
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)NGINX Plus
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
-
Ratings
NGINX Plus
8.1
5 Ratings
1% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings8.14 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)NGINX Plus
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
F5 Advanced WAF
F5 Advanced WAF
Score 9.3 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)NGINX Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(2 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(1 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)NGINX Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
Imperva
Imperva web application firewall does a great job in giving us control over access to our public web servers. With our regular hosting provider, we couldn't block access based on geography, or really anything. So we had to rely on traditional access controls to protect the data. But with the WAF, we can block countries such as North Korea, or we could stop any SQL Injection attempts, or even do a temporary block of IP in the case of detected brute-forcing.
Read full review
F5
Makes our life easy as application admins in securing our applications and making them accessible. We can easily add an application within a few minutes and define the backend servers right away.
Read full review
Pros
Imperva
  • Alert Aggregation - Correlates different violations into perceived correlated attacks.
  • Ease of deployment - as one of the only WAFs that allow bridge mode deployment, this can be deployed with without downtime and no Network Architecture modifications. If the need for proxy is required at a later time, Transparent Reverse Proxy can be deployed within seconds and minimal configuration.
  • Custom Policies - Custom security policies are easy to configure.
  • Reporting - There are a good amount of pre-configured reports available by default.
Read full review
F5
  • Load balancing
  • Caching
  • App security
  • Boost App performance
Read full review
Cons
Imperva
  • The UI can use a little work (but is largely decent)
Read full review
F5
  • Update full config via api
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Imperva
No answers on this topic
F5
No reason not to renew it, we are happy with it.
Read full review
Usability
Imperva
There are just a couple of points that are hard to find, that probably could be elsewhere. But these are minor; everything else is right where you'd expect it to be.
Read full review
F5
It's been great for us for 3+ years now.
Read full review
Support Rating
Imperva
We haven't needed support from Imperva since implementation. But during that time, their personnel were very quick to respond to questions. Since then, it's been largely doing its thing for us (which is exactly what we'd hoped).
Read full review
F5
We had an issue after upgrading from RHEL 7 to 8, and there were some issues that the security team imposed upon the platform with a scanning tool. We also had a VXLAN environment that was not properly sending a gratuitous arp to the network. NGINX support was instrumental to speedily resolving our issue.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Imperva
Ultimately, it was the easiest to work with that was still a "known" company (we've been burned too many times by up-and-comers). We needed something that gave us a lot of control but then didn't need its handheld on a daily basis. Imperva gives us a lot of that and we are still able to navigate it with ease.
Read full review
F5
The API and dashboard alone make NGINX Plus a better choice.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Imperva
  • Meet compliance requirements - Check.
  • Better Insight into web application - Absolutely great, checks all the traffic against RFC standards and will alert on common development mistakes that duplicate application traffic or provide attack vectors for potential attackers.
  • Have had several issues blocking a customer without producing alerts, while it happened only one week out of 2 years of working with the devices, it did produce a lot of headaches.
Read full review
F5
  • More uptime for business critical applications
  • Less overhead for administrator to maintain the applications
Read full review
ScreenShots