Infer vs. Metadata.io

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Infer
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Infer is a predictive intelligence lead scoring platform with pre-built integrations to Salesforce, Eloqua, and Marketo.N/A
Metadata.io
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Based in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.
$24,000
per year
Pricing
InferMetadata.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
MetaMatch
$295
per month per installation
Web Personalization
$24,000
per year
Audience Targeting
$24,000
per year
Metadata Base Platform
$60,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
InferMetadata.io
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$2,500 one-time fee per installation
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
InferMetadata.io
Best Alternatives
InferMetadata.io
Small Businesses
Mediafly
Mediafly
Score 7.7 out of 10
Sitecore Send
Sitecore Send
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Clari
Clari
Score 8.6 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Clari
Clari
Score 8.6 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
InferMetadata.io
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
7.8
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(15 ratings)
User Testimonials
InferMetadata.io
Likelihood to Recommend
IgniteTech
It is ideal to expand the range of customers, to have an updated and optimized database with interested customers, and allows sales and marketing agents to work in achieving sales and not in the laborious task of finding customers. This software is very effective and delivers what it promises.
Read full review
Metadata, Inc
Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
Read full review
Pros
IgniteTech
  • Provides insights on companies to help you infer if they would be a good fit to prospect into, or not
  • Collects data on external sites very well
Read full review
Metadata, Inc
  • Best paid ops tool I've ever used (and I've used a lot): we can launch a new LinkedIn & Facebook campaign in minutes.
  • Lead gen ops: no more dealing with broken zapier zaps, we are able to automate pushing native lead gen leads directly to our CRM.
  • Attribution: see influenced & triggered opportunities/CW deals
  • Multivariate testing: Metadata scales audience, ad, creative testing so you learn what performs much faster than manual process
Read full review
Cons
IgniteTech
  • The user interface and all the information it generates on the main screen can be cumbersome.
  • The learning curve is quite considerable and it takes a few hours of training to understand the system.
  • The software becomes cumbersome when information needs to be passed to Salesforce.
Read full review
Metadata, Inc
  • If you don't have a large budget and audience it's hard to meaningfully optimize. If I have 4 ad creatives, to 2 audience groups on FB and LinkedIn, that creates 16 experiments, each of which needs an ample enough budget, say $40/day, that's now $640 per day or $19K per month.
  • Limited ability to edit ads after they've been launched. You usually have to stop the ad, clone it, and launch a new campaign.
  • Can't add new ads to existing campaigns which limits the ability to optimize. If I start an MD campaign with 4 ads, and in a few weeks we see that one is working well and the other 2 are not performing, I can pause those (or it can autopause by rules), but I can't add 2 more new creatives to the mix against the high performer. I'd have to either stop the high performer, and recreate it in a new campaign (losing likes and comments), OR - leave the high performer in the first campaign, and create. a second campaign with the new ones, which will only optimize against each other.
  • Limited to a single conversion event on a landing page. I'm not able to choose either a Demo Request OR a Sign-Up conversion, I can only choose one.
  • Google search ads are doable but aren't necessarily more feature-rich or easy-to use than native, so there's no value added to doing it through Metadata in my opinion aside from unifying ad reporting.
Read full review
Support Rating
IgniteTech
No answers on this topic
Metadata, Inc
Metadata's customer support is a difference-maker! They really do care how well your campaigns perform and will help you improve them.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IgniteTech
I believe that the two complement each other. Datanyze pulls off of a number of data points. Onsite it can pull technologies used (javascript based and also infrastructural), products offered, SEO ranking, and it even integrates with LinkedIn to pull names. Datanyze also has prospecting features - you can pull lists of companies based on technologies used, location, SEO (Alexa/changes with Alexa rank, SEO strategy, speed testing), SEM data points, industry, employee or revenue size, funding round dates and amounts, business segment, founding date, etc. It integrates with salesforce too so you can import leads directly into the system with the paid version. We bought for the scoring, but there is a lot that it can do.
Read full review
Metadata, Inc
We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't want to pay for features we weren't going to use.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IgniteTech
  • Once adapted to the software, we have been able to get a lot out of it, as we have been able to increase sales with the leads we have found.
  • Also, the sales department is more focused and works in a much more organized way, increasing their daily performance and productivity.
Read full review
Metadata, Inc
  • Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
  • Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
  • 90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
  • Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things
Read full review
ScreenShots

Metadata.io Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of