Infor's Distribution SX.e ERP solution helps all types of distributors increase productivity and adapt quickly to an evolving market. Providing broad visibility across the entire organization, this solution delivers control in managing thousands of transactions, suppliers, and customers while simultaneously tracking millions of inventory items.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score7.2 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
Infor Distribution SX.e
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Infor Distribution SX.e
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Infor Distribution SX.e
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration
10.01 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Plug-ins
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
10.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Role-based user permissions
10.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Standard reports
10.01 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Custom reports
10.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
10.0
1 Ratings
26% above category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable
10.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
Accounts receivable
10.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
10.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
10.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
10.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standardized Processes
10.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
0% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
10.01 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.01 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
9.7
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Pricing
9.01 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order entry
10.01 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Credit card processing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.01 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration
10.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Billing Management
10.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Period Close
10.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
9.1
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Cost Capture
9.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
9.0
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
16% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
8.6
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
9.2
1 Ratings
27% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
8.5
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
114% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
20% below category average
Forecasting
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
9.0
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
115% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
9.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Infor Distribution SX.e
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
80% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Infor Distribution SX.e and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Overall management of companies operations including sales, inventory control, warehousing, accounting (ar, ap, and gl). We are able to take a customers order, provide information if the product is in stock, send the order to the warehouse, pick the order, deliver the order using our custom routing program built inside SX.e, invoice the order upon receiving shipping feedback, and then collecting payment within SX.e. We also use SX.e for our purchasing of products from our vendors, tracking the products, entering the products into inventory, and then updating each location with the current inventory. We also are able to track pricing and vendor rebates as well as special price adjustments within SX.e.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SXe fit our distribution model and it allowed us to customize it to our specific needs that were not available in the other solutions. The 3rd party integration was also a nice benefit as we use multiple solutions that were not part of the SXe Suite.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info