Fin is an AI Agent for customer service. It automates complex queries, improves resolution times, and delivers consistently high-quality support at scale.
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
Oracle CRM On Demand
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
The basis of this offering is the Market2Lead product that Oracle acquired in 2010. It has now been fully integrated with Oracle's On Demand CRM product and is a full-featured marketing automation product with features from lead management and nurturing, to measuring marketing ROI.
N/A
Pricing
Fin
Oracle CRM On Demand
Editions & Modules
Fin with your current helpdesk
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
Copilot add-on
$35
per month per user
Pro add-on
$99
per month For analysis of 1,000 conversations
Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk
from $39 + $0.99 per Fin outcome
per month per seat
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fin
Oracle CRM On Demand
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Fin comes with a 90-day money-back guarantee. Here's how it works:
Intercom states that users who sign up for the Fin Guarantee Success Program and do not achieve at least a resolution rate of 65% will be paid $1M. This program is designed for high volume customers.
Eligibility criteria:
High volume customers (over 250k monthly conversions) in North America and Europe. Intercom states that phase one of this program will admit customers on Intercom Helpdesk or Zendesk.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fin
Oracle CRM On Demand
Features
Fin
Oracle CRM On Demand
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.9
25 Ratings
12% above category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.025 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Territory management
00 Ratings
8.024 Ratings
Opportunity management
00 Ratings
8.025 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
Contract management
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Quote & order management
00 Ratings
10.023 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
00 Ratings
10.023 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.7
24 Ratings
23% above category average
Case management
00 Ratings
10.024 Ratings
Call center management
00 Ratings
10.023 Ratings
Help desk management
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
9% above category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
8.024 Ratings
Email marketing
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
24 Ratings
16% above category average
Task management
00 Ratings
9.023 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
9.023 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
10% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.024 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
00 Ratings
6.623 Ratings
Customizable reports
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.2
24 Ratings
7% above category average
Custom fields
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Scripting environment
00 Ratings
5.820 Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
9.023 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.5
25 Ratings
12% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.025 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
18 Ratings
18% above category average
Social data
00 Ratings
9.018 Ratings
Social engagement
00 Ratings
9.018 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Fin
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
22 Ratings
18% above category average
Marketing automation
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
Compensation management
00 Ratings
9.020 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
Fin is fantastic at answering simpler inquiries, where the range and types of questions are easier to categorize. Thereby reducing the subset of possible answers. Where it has shown great improvement - but still needs more improvement - is by becoming a true Agentic AI support engineer that is capable of answering more technically nuanced questions. Our product has a lot of variables used for troubleshooting that cannot be adequately captured in documentation. Even though we provide thousands of pages of spec docs, each issue is unique. Training and empowering Fin to be as good as a Level 1 support engineer is still very challenging.
I think it is well suited for organizations which are large with a lot of users so as to be able to minimize the cost of operations. Also, the organization which interacts mostly with customers can use Oracle CRM on demand.
Several of our members were not familiar with various IT functions within CRM prior to working with it and so they were able to develop a working knowledge of IT pretty quickly afterwards.
It has a familiar feel to it as it allows users to work the data into a spreadsheet type layout with pivot tables and graphs and so it is quick to adopt.
Customization is great with a working knowledge of HTML, which isn't too hard to learn. You can really adapt CRM to any needs stylistically or content wise.
It seems some users really struggle to figure out how to escalate to a human (especially through email).
Not excited about how "soft" resolutions still count as resolutions and are paid for. Though some abandoned cases appear to be able to be concluded as "the user got the answer they needed", there are others where they clearly didn't, because they just open up another chat (or even more), trying to get more info. This pads the resolution stats and makes it seem more effective than it actually is.
Cost -- Fin is quite expensive. It helps us with scaling coverage, but we're not really saving money.
The ability to schedule and push out reports is missing from this system. If we want to mass deliver a report on a schedule, we must run it, export it and email it out to the group, or purchase a 3rd party system.
The ability to trigger workflow events on a schedule is missing this system. Currently, there has to be a trigger initiated by a user and we have situations where we'd like to be able to schedule a work flow routine to go out and check from specific situations and then trigger an action. We'd also like to be able to trigger workflow actions on one object based on something in another object and this capability is very limited.
We have been and will be continuing our journey with Intercom and nothing too concerning has happened that I have experienced or heard of that has us on the edge yet. If it ever happens it will be something along the lines of "Outgrowing" the use of need of the platform.
The platform is overall clear and intuitive. As with any new platform, there's a learning curve, but that wasn't an issue for our team (and it shouldn't be an issue for others). Fin options are scattered across several submenus, and I'd like them grouped together, but I also like having all those training-related tabs open at all times, so it's not much of a real issue for me.
Compared to other competitors I find it very easy to use and learn .It has been helpful in our organisation and we have been able to manage our projects and operations well without interference.
I can get help by asking Fin questions about itself. It answers accurately, citing its own Help Center resources with visuals. It can reason and dialogue well. But when it comes to getting human support for Fin, it is not as quick. It can sometimes take a few days. They are polite and well-meaning. Some things aren't their fault (product limitations), but there was one occasion where something took a long time to resolve with lots of back and forth but it was I who found out the error in the end that they missed, so they didn't really help resolve it.
There are so many AI platforms available, and you could theoretically build a system using the available AI API's from any of the big platforms. However, I dont think it's as easy as this. Intercom is deliberately built for customer service, the features they are releasing a based on providing the best customer experience. If we were to build this ourselves or to use another platform we would be taking on the upkeep, using Fin is just much simpler as it's also our chosen ticketing platform so anything that Fin is not able to answer yet and escalated directly to our team with no extra effort required from our side.
MS Dynamics was easy to integrate to MS Power BI. This BI and reporting aspect is a clear strong point for Microsoft. MS solutions seem easier to integrate and learn, but this depends on the IT landscape and the complexity of integrations in a respective company.
New role opportunities — Using the “Fin-first” approach has reduced the workload for our Tier 1 team, giving them more time to focus on their own career growth. It’s also opened the door to a dedicated, AI-focused role, where a team member regularly reviews Fin’s answers and makes updates to help it perform even better.
Enabling Fin has also reduced our response time and allowed us to meet SLA's.
This software can display in real-time when an order is submitted, received, fulfilled, and shipped out. We are able to know within the week of what new orders came in and how effective we are being from targeting specific regions of the nation.