JAGGAER vs. procurEngine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JAGGAER
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
JAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.N/A
procurEngine
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
JAGGAERprocurEngine
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JAGGAERprocurEngine
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JAGGAERprocurEngine
Considered Both Products
JAGGAER
Chose JAGGAER
Currently integrating SAP Concur although it's very new to us so I cannot speak much on it. Initial thoughts is that the user setup concept is similar but I don't have much else outside of that.
Chose JAGGAER
JAGGAER seems more intuitive and more robust for users
Chose JAGGAER
The SciQuest bid system is new and integrating it would be difficult since we have quite a lot of historical bid information that SciQuest cannot obtain from IonWave.
Chose JAGGAER
Although the base costs for Oracle were cheaper, by the time you added in all the additional charges for oracle, it ended up being significantly more expensive. In addition, we felt the SciQuest product was better suited our needs. It was geared more towards a science/research …
Chose JAGGAER
SciQuest is an easier solution for our users to navigate and use
Chose JAGGAER
Again, our SciQuest system integrates with Banner. Banner does have a way to create, approve and report on POs. However, the SciQuest product is so much more user friendly, so the learning curve is very steep. Also, SciQuest gives us a lot more detail in our reporting and PO …
Chose JAGGAER
Product functionality and ease of use was better than others.
Chose JAGGAER
We conducted a one year RFP. No one, not even Aribi, was able to do what SciQuest could do in the higher educational space. Granted that was seven years ago, but in my opinion no one could touch them.
Chose JAGGAER
Have not used any other online ordering system besides SciQuest
Chose JAGGAER
PeopleSoft eprocurement 9; it is much more complicated than SciQuest.
Chose JAGGAER
SciQuest has a better model for how they work with the suppliers themselves. Other groups use a model where suppliers have to pay in order to be included in the list of suppliers that they support.
Chose JAGGAER
Never used another online procurement solution in my other jobs. I of course purchase things online with amazon etc.
Chose JAGGAER
Better enforcement of state contracts. Sciquest also has good form builder functionality
Chose JAGGAER
I have only used SciQuest, i cannot compare it to the others you have listed. I do know that SciQuest works very well in a large or small company setting.
Chose JAGGAER
better tech support from SQ. easier user interface with SQ
Chose JAGGAER
As a supplier, SciQuest is selected by our customers - we are always confident when this selection is made.
One appreciates working together with SciQuest when considering some of the issues we've encountered with other marketplace/procurement solutions:
- Uneven support from …
procurEngine

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
JAGGAERprocurEngine
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 9.5 out of 10
Precoro
Precoro
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JAGGAERprocurEngine
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JAGGAERprocurEngine
Likelihood to Recommend
The SciQuest application helps guide users toward preferred suppliers. The efficiencies experienced in both sending out orders to suppliers as well as bringing back invoices helps our users maintain their inventories as well as allowing them to better understand the condition of their budgets and spend because of the quick turnaround
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The workflow works great for routing requisitions to the appropriate approvers. It's also very customizable to adapt workflow to fit our current policies.
  • SciQuest pushes requisitions straight into our ERP, eliminating the need for duplicate data entry.
  • Punchouts are a great time saver for our end users to compare pricing within the same system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The UI is pretty dry form a user point of view (I've heard this many times by end users over the years)
  • Documents look the same for the most part (for invoices, reqs and POs)
  • Possibly some updates other types of data exports
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Well, I put it in the middle because I hope someday we will get a chance to put eProcurement suite of needed products out for RFP one day. It will not happen anytime soon due to the current administration. But I'm hopeful, and if and when it happens, SciQuest no doubt will be a strong contender.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
24/7 support. Never send you to India or some foreign country support line. Always get an answer, even if it's an answer you did not want. Always well formed conclusions/solutions to problems. They genuinely seem to care about the service they provide
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
SciQuest has changed its name to Jaggaer.https://www.jaggaer.com/
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
As a supplier, SciQuest is selected by our customers - we are always confident when this selection is made. One appreciates working together with SciQuest when considering some of the issues we've encountered with other marketplace/procurement solutions: - Uneven support from staff who were less than fully trained - Non-adherence to standards such as cXML despite claims to be compliant - Difficulty garnering project resources necessary to complete an implementation - Outdated and error-prone catalog management portals
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
  • Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots