JIST vs. Looker
JIST vs. Looker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JIST | N/A | JIST is presented as a multi-entity business intelligence platform by enabling BI dashboards to have a parent-child reporting relationship, which helps organizations with multiple entities to analyze their business performance. JIST provides dashboards that help businesses track and measure their key performance indicators (KPIs). It is built on Power BI. | N/A | |
Looker | N/A | Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems. | N/A |
| JIST | Looker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Required | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Must contact sales team for pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| JIST | Looker |
|---|
| JIST | Looker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI Standard Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||
| Ad-hoc Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||
| Report Output and Scheduling |
| |||||||||||||||
| Data Discovery and Visualization |
| |||||||||||||||
| Access Control and Security |
| |||||||||||||||
| Mobile Capabilities |
|
| JIST | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Yellowfin Score 8.7 out of 10 | Yellowfin Score 8.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Reveal Score 10.0 out of 10 | Reveal Score 10.0 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Kyvos Semantic Layer Score 9.5 out of 10 | Kyvos Semantic Layer Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| JIST | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (132 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.2 (8 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.8 (12 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 6.0 (1 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.8 (14 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Professional Services | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| JIST | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Pros | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Cons | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Usability | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Performance | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Webonise No answers on this topic | ![]() Google
|
| ScreenShots | Looker Screenshots |





