Jitterbit vs. SQL Server Integration Services

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jitterbit
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Jitterbit is a cloud integration technology for cloud, social or mobile apps. It provides accessibility for non-technical users, including easily creating API’s and data transformation scripts within the integrations.
$1,000
per month
SSIS
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) is a data integration solution.N/A
Pricing
JitterbitSQL Server Integration Services
Editions & Modules
Jitterbit
$100.00
Starting Price Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JitterbitSSIS
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JitterbitSQL Server Integration Services
Considered Both Products
Jitterbit
Chose Jitterbit
Jitterbit is completely cloud-based and offers a cleaner way to connect to SOAP API endpoints. SQL Server Integration Services has a larger ecosystem of plugin connectors by third parties (at a cost), but the downside is that you still need to use something like Visual Studio …
Chose Jitterbit

Other Products: IBM- Cast Iron, Krise.

Jitterbit provides both cloud and on premise solution and pricing was also fair.

SSIS

No answer on this topic

Features
JitterbitSQL Server Integration Services
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Jitterbit
7.2
12 Ratings
11% below category average
SQL Server Integration Services
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors8.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification7.211 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console6.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Jitterbit
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
6.0
54 Ratings
31% below category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings8.054 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings4.041 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Jitterbit
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
7.0
54 Ratings
14% below category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings10.054 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings4.053 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Jitterbit
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
7.0
52 Ratings
11% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings8.627 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings7.133 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings5.043 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings8.039 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings6.049 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Jitterbit
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
3.0
42 Ratings
90% below category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings3.037 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings3.037 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JitterbitSQL Server Integration Services
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JitterbitSQL Server Integration Services
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(25 ratings)
8.0
(54 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(9 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(9 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(8 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
JitterbitSQL Server Integration Services
Likelihood to Recommend
Jitterbit
This is a great tool for bringing data out of your locked, internal systems and getting it into the cloud. It meshes well with Salesforce and is fairly easy to use, helping the transition from other older, more complex tools into a more modern environment. It has lots of competition in this space and some are better than others, but if your data is straight forward and you know it well, Jitterbit will get the job done. If you are not as close or comfortable with your data and need to do some wildly complex migrations, there might be better packages out there for you.
Read full review
Microsoft
Ideal if the company is already a Microsoft shop, so chances are that it is free with SQL Server. Also, good for moving data between on premise systems. Not ideal for moving data to the cloud. No functionality out of the box to work with REST APIs. Stable product but definitely not the future
Read full review
Pros
Jitterbit
  • UI is super easy to understand with a low learning curve so admins can figure it out and maintain it without breaking anything.
  • It's FREE! There's a paid version too but I like that you can use most of the features for free and they're not pushy with buying.
  • There's a great user community that you can google and ask any questions. Most problems I've encountered have been posted and answered already.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Standard ETL use cases for daily loads
  • Loading incoming data from Vendors which is placed on FTP and adding them to the SQL Warehouse
  • Creating outgoing data files and writing them to Vendor FTPs
  • Easy Active Directory integration for seamless connections to SQL Server
  • CI/CD by hosting the code on visualstudio.com
Read full review
Cons
Jitterbit
  • Migrating operations from QA to Production work well for initial deployment, however, when migrating an update to an existing job to production, sometimes certain project items are duplicated. This is not the end of the world... the duplicates can be removed, but would be nice if it was not required.
  • I have not found a way to trap under-the-covers SOAP errors (for example, when a query you are running against Salesforce takes too long). You get a warning error in the operation log that the job only pulled a "partial" file, but it does not fail.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Connection managers for online data sources can be tricky to configure.
  • Performance tuning is an art form and trialing different data flow task options can be cumbersome. SSIS can do a better job of providing performance data including historical for monitoring.
  • Mapping destination using OLE DB command is difficult as destination columns are unnamed.
  • Excel or flat file connections are limited by version and type.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Jitterbit
I have been evaluating other tools as a continuous improvement practice. I would like something that would be easier to use for a non-technical user. I work for a small organization and have no back-up for Jitterbit if something happens to me. We don't have the technically savvy employees to understand it.
Read full review
Microsoft
Some features should be revised or improved, some tools (using it with Visual Studio) of the toolbox should be less schematic and somewhat more flexible. Using for example, the CSV data import is still very old-fashioned and if the data format changes it requires a bit of manual labor to accept the new data structure
Read full review
Usability
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SSIS is a great tool for most ETL needs. It has the 90% (or more) use cases covered and even in many of the use cases where it is not ideal SSIS can be extended via a .NET language to do the job well in a supportable way for almost any performance workload.
Read full review
Performance
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SQL Server Integration Services performance is dependent directly upon the resources provided to the system. In our environment, we allocated 6 nodes of 4 CPUs, 64GB each, running in parallel. Unfortunately, we had to ramp-up to such a robust environment to get the performance to where we needed it. Most of the reports are completed in a reasonable timeframe. However, in the case of slow running reports, it is often difficult if not impossible to cancel the report without killing the report instance or stopping the service.
Read full review
Support Rating
Jitterbit
They have some of the best support of any software vendor that we use. They always get our issues resolved quickly
Read full review
Microsoft
The support, when necessary, is excellent. But beyond that, it is very rarely necessary because the user community is so large, vibrant and knowledgable, a simple Google query or forum question can answer almost everything you want to know. You can also get prewritten script tasks with a variety of functionality that saves a lot of time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The implementation may be different in each case, it is important to properly analyze all the existing infrastructure to understand the kind of work needed, the type of software used and the compatibility between these, the features that you want to exploit, to understand what is possible and which ones require integration with third-party tools
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Jitterbit
Evaluated Dell Boomi and Celigo as alternatives prior to purchasing Jitterbit. We went with Jitterbit at that time because we could handle all changes ourselves without any assistance from Jitterbit, and we liked their size and nimbleness. Dell Boomi was too big for us, and Celigo at that time did not have a self-service model. Every change had to go through them (although that has since changed). We were not in a position to be able to wait for someone to make changes for us given the rate of change within the business.
Read full review
Microsoft
I had nothing to do with the choice or install. I assume it was made because it's easy to integrate with our SQL Server environment and free. I'm not sure of any other enterprise level solution that would solve this problem, but I would likely have approached it with traditional scripting. Comparably free, but my own familiarity with trad scripts would be my final deciding factor. Perhaps with some further training on SSIS I would have a different answer.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Jitterbit
  • The time it takes to connect systems has reduced by orders of magnitude. Previously, we would custom-develop connectors between various systems and they would all be managed by different vendors. With Jitterbit speed-to-deploy and the efficiency gained by managing all connections in one dashboard has been the greatest piece of the ROI.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Data integrity across various products allows unify certain processes inside the organization and save funds by reducing human labour factor.
  • Automated data unification allows us plan our inputs better and reduce over-warehousing by overbuying
  • The employee number, responsible for data management was reduced from 4 to 1 person
Read full review
ScreenShots