TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    JW Player

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/AJW Player (or JWP) is a video platform boasting 40,000 broadcasters, publishers, and other video-driven brands whose business relies on video as users. It provides these companies with a way to accelerate and scale their video strategy and is a video platform that can be used to stream video, engage audiences on any screen, and monetize content.N/A

    Panopto

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/APanopto is a video management platform for businesses and universities from the company of the same name in Seattle, supporting the recording, sharing, live streaming, and (after recording) sharing via LMS or internal video site, video search, and virtual classroom.

    $14.99

    per month

    Pricing
    JW PlayerPanopto
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Pro
    $14.99
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JW PlayerPanopto
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JW PlayerPanopto
    Considered Both Products
    JW Player
    No answer on this topic
    Panopto
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    JW PlayerPanopto
    Video Marketing
    Comparison of Video Marketing features of JW Player and Panopto
    Feature
    JW Player
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Panopto
    7.0
    6 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Support for advertisements9.12 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Video SEO8.12 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Video personalization00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
    eCommerce00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Video Security
    Comparison of Video Security features of JW Player and Panopto
    Feature
    JW Player
    7.8
    3 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Panopto
    8.8
    10 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Video access controls9.01 Ratings9.09 Ratings
    User management9.01 Ratings9.010 Ratings
    Video link sharing7.03 Ratings10.010 Ratings
    External video6.02 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Internal video00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Video Player
    Comparison of Video Player features of JW Player and Panopto
    Feature
    JW Player
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Panopto
    8.5
    10 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Player customization2.03 Ratings7.08 Ratings
    Embedded videos6.03 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Video quality / Bandwidth controls10.03 Ratings8.89 Ratings
    Mobile compatibility10.03 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Video Analytics
    Comparison of Video Analytics features of JW Player and Panopto
    Feature
    JW Player
    1.0
    3 Ratings
    155% below category average
    Panopto
    7.5
    10 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Per viewer tracking1.01 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Per video tracking1.02 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Video analytics dashboard1.03 Ratings6.38 Ratings
    A/B testing00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Streaming quality reports00 Ratings6.04 Ratings
    Video Hosting, Management & Storage
    Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of JW Player and Panopto
    Feature
    JW Player
    8.6
    3 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Panopto
    8.1
    9 Ratings
    6% below category average
    On-Demand video6.03 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    Live streaming10.01 Ratings7.28 Ratings
    Video upload & format support10.03 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Video library / File management7.03 Ratings9.29 Ratings
    Video portal10.01 Ratings7.88 Ratings
    Impact of streaming on network00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Video Platform Integrations
    Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of JW Player and Panopto
    Feature
    JW Player
    -
    Ratings
    Panopto
    9.4
    7 Ratings
    41% above category average
    Integration to LMS00 Ratings9.47 Ratings
    Video Engagement
    Comparison of Video Engagement features of JW Player and Panopto
    Feature
    JW Player
    -
    Ratings
    Panopto
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Audience polling00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Audience Q&A / Live chat00 Ratings7.25 Ratings
    Video comments00 Ratings9.27 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    JW PlayerPanopto
    Small Businesses
    Vidyard
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Vidyard
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Vidyard
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Vidyard
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Panopto
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Ensemble Video
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    JW PlayerPanopto
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JW PlayerPanopto
    Likelihood to Recommend
    JW Player
    JW Player has flexible plans that won't cost you a lot of money. If you are a startup, JW offers a variety of plans that will suit your specific needs and grow with you as your company grows. You do not need to be a video expert to understand how to upload a video, which allows nearly anyone in the office to do it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    Panopto is great if you have a lot of video content that you need to put in a central repository. It makes it easy to manage who sees it and how it is categorized. The captioning features are also really good too. For folks to view the video, they don't need a Panopto account. You can send them a direct link. If you want to upload videos, however, they will need a Panopto account. If you only have a few videos or care less about usage statistics, SharePoint may be a better file repository option
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    JW Player
    • Responsive HTML5
    • Provides share functionality built into the player
    • Platform use enables playlist functionality and playlist players which can be customized or versioned for specific uses
    • Videos uploaded to the JW Platform automatically provide multiple image frame options for selecting video thumbnail
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    • Simple to use - It really is a click-and-go system. Log in, click on record, and you're set.
    • Flexible - It allows multiple information-rich inputs to be recorded simultaneously (for example, the screen, webcams, microphones, etc.). For some demonstrations, having multiple perspectives/views can be beneficial. The ability to add multiple webcams enhanced the value of some of my recordings.
    • Reliable - This is critical when an unforeseen opportunity arises and you want to capture it visually and with audio. I had multiple experiences where a unique person was available briefly and due to Panopto's reliability, I was able to capture content that would otherwise have been seen by only those physically present at the time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    JW Player
    • Definitely missing the ability (in and easy way) to have clickable links in the video.
    • Analytics is a little cumbersome and not very user-friendly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    • Panopto doesn't fully support Ultra courses in Blackboard - we can do quizzing, which is very helpful, but we can't do video submissions like an Original course.
    • There is no built-in certificate option for completing a video and its quiz questions, which requires us to use additional systems for tracking and awarding.
    • Analytics are mediocre. The reporting tools are challenging to use and to get clear information on a consistent basis.
    • Quizzing is limited to multiple choice or T/F -- there is no reflection point or open-ended question format.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    JW Player
    Just made the decision to renew given demonstrated improvements being made to the platform to expand compatibility for its player use on devices such as Apple TV, as well as improvements made recently to its JW Platform Dashboard
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    JW Player
    Reliability and compatibility on a majority of platforms. Would have received a 10 except recent versions of browsers such as Firefox are now defaulting against Flash components and thus prompting approval from users BEFORE loading which is a HUGE obstacle to an effective user experience thus creating concerns by end-users unnecessarily and risking that they will NOT accept the prompts, thus leaving unable to view video content hosted using the JW Player. Assurances by JW support suggest they will resolve this, so we'll see...
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    Needs some work, but I'm sure improvements will come over time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    JW Player
    Support is reasonable. I from time to time have made suggestions on improvements that would be nice to see (like the ability to have a clickable link within the video - that is easy to create, without tons of coding) and it seems as though I never see it happen or get much response to "suggestions" to upgrade the software. The good news, other than a few things as I mentioned above, overall, I don't have many "technical issues" in the platform, which is a good thing. On occasion, I have seen some "issues" with the delivery of the video, but it has been pretty scarce. So it is dependable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    Panopto has been quick to answer any questions, but their rollouts and updates have caused issues where we felt a little blindsided by unexpected changes. Their development cycle is slow and often their promises for future updates have been extremely slow or never come.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    JW Player
    One of the primary features promoted by JW Platform is its SEO definition. However, there did not seem to be a way to integrate that data to our platform if selected thus only leaving the benefits of that data to be established on the individual video page hosted by JW Platform, which isn't useful in the end to the client value we are trying to deliver for our VideoproFile.net solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    JW Player
    JW had more player options, a better/more intuitive user interface, was altogether faster both in rendering the uploaded videos and in time to load on the web page. The integration with OpenX for pre-roll was faster and easier than with Brightcove, and lastly, they offered a great price for service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    Cost wise, unless you have a huge audience, Panopto is better. Both Zoom Meeting and Kaltura and for more expensive and a smaller program/company may not have the demand to justify them. Kaltura - is a far superior tool, the UI is much more modern and easier for a novice user to understand, and it makes sharing videos amongst faculty much easier. The LMS integration if far smoother and the recording is much easier and faster (from within the LMS). The analytics are also present in a much cleaner and digestible way. Lastly, the quizzing feature is far more robust. Zoom - Smoother at streaming and live interactions. Stronger chat feature and supports larger audiences, it can handle over 100 HD webcams at once if needed. It does basic desktop capture and supporting audio-only formats that can easily be converted to Podcast or Soundcloud. Google Loom - This one is not listed above as it's rather new but its a FREE tool for fast video/desktop/PPT recordings and it's extremely fast and easy to share. That said it's pretty basic as far as any additional features are concerned. Post-production editing is limited to basic timeline trimming.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    JW Player
    • JW Player has was less expensive (without sacrificing quality) than our previous video platform so the ROI was instant.
    • We were easily able to add a variety of video advertising options including pre-roll, mid-roll and post-roll.
    • The quality and consistancy of the look of the video has enabled us to grow our video views by well over 100% since starting with JW.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Panopto
    • Panopto integrates with our LMS, D2L quite well. It makes the process very simple for our instructors and students to record and watch videos.
    • It does not require any plugins or software to watch videos, as they load up in a web browser.
    • The videos work on mobile and embed easily in courses or on websites.
    • We also enjoy the easy sharing of videos and simplified management in the web portal.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots