LinkedIn Talent Hub vs. PeopleFluent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LinkedIn Talent Hub
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
LinkedIn Talent is a recruiting solution. It offers core ATS capabilities, as well as proactive recruitment outreach tailored to LinkedIn’s site. LinkedIn Talent also enables competitive insights and recruitment marketing.N/A
PeopleFluent
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.N/A
Pricing
LinkedIn Talent HubPeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LinkedIn Talent HubPeopleFluent
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
LinkedIn Talent HubPeopleFluent
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
LinkedIn Talent Hub
7.0
77 Ratings
13% below category average
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
26% above category average
Job Requisition Management4.263 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Company Website Posting7.167 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Publish to Social Media8.067 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting7.169 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Customized Application Form7.059 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Resume Management7.065 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention7.953 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Candidate Search8.076 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Applicant Tracking8.058 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Collaboration8.064 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation7.256 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Email Templates6.165 Ratings10.05 Ratings
User Permissions6.160 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts6.170 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Reporting7.761 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
9% above category average
New hire portal00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools00 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
12% above category average
Corporate goal setting00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Individual goal setting00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Performance tracking00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance plans00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Plan weighting00 Ratings4.06 Ratings
Manager note taking00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Performance improvement plans00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Review status tracking00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Review reminders00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Workflow restrictions00 Ratings5.06 Ratings
Multiple review frequency00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings7.08 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
13% below category average
Create succession plans/pools00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Candidate ranking00 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Candidate search00 Ratings6.08 Ratings
Candidate development00 Ratings6.06 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
5.8
2 Ratings
20% below category average
Course catalog or library00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Player/Portal00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Learning content00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile friendly00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Assignments00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Compliance management00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Learning administration00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Social learning00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LinkedIn Talent HubPeopleFluent
Small Businesses
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
Paycor
Paycor
Score 7.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.6 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Vibe HCM
Vibe HCM
Score 4.4 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LinkedIn Talent HubPeopleFluent
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(79 ratings)
8.8
(31 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(13 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(22 ratings)
8.5
(4 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
LinkedIn Talent HubPeopleFluent
Likelihood to Recommend
LinkedIn
I really feel like [LinkedIn Talent Hub] has great potential to be used by many many companies. I think if it is made a little more user friendly with a little more development on the back end to remove some bugs, this could be a potential game changer. I have enjoyed working and getting to know this.
Read full review
PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
Read full review
Pros
LinkedIn
  • Source of talent - LinkedIn has become the #1 place to engage talent.
  • Targeting / advertising / sponsoring employment ads are very effective. They are costly, but effective.
  • Connecting with talent via InMails and ability to send InMails to a pretty targeted audience with ease is great. This allows you to reach out/connect fast with people that "fit" what you are looking for. Other sites for recruiting, etc. are hit and miss. The quality of results is the strongest on LinkedIn and has been for many, many years.
Read full review
PeopleFluent
  • It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
  • It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
  • The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
Read full review
Cons
LinkedIn
  • Reporting. Major lacking here. If a job is closed then reopened (which that feature was recently removed), all reporting is wiped clean and picked back up with the "reopen" date. So it doesn't give a full history of the job activity.
  • Lacks adequate approvals in the system.
  • If you're a company with a risk of audits, I would not recommend Talent Hub. They lack compliance: the system allows us to "hire" someone who never applied to the job. Req history could be incomplete with the way reporting functions are set up. The system puts passive "sourced" candidates and applicants in the same bucket for pipeline workflows. Disposition status is inadequate and greatly lacking, etc.
  • Dashboard is not customizable.
  • We do not have our own unique req IDs. The system generates project IDs but these numbers are shared with all their clients, they're not unique to Ora so they are somewhat random and not in order.
  • They do not differentiate between a networking project and an approved requisition.
  • There's more, too many to list.
Read full review
PeopleFluent
  • The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
  • Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
  • Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
LinkedIn
No answers on this topic
PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
Read full review
Usability
LinkedIn
No answers on this topic
PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
Read full review
Support Rating
LinkedIn
Although we never experienced any issues with the LinkedIn Talent platform or required any support, we always knew in the event that we did need assistance, it was readily available. LinkedIn as a whole is always very supportive and responsive whenever I've had any issues or even a simple question in the past. I'm sure anyone experiencing difficulties with the platform would have a resolution from the support team just about instantly.
Read full review
PeopleFluent
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
LinkedIn
It's definitely better than other competitors because of one a better pool of candidates, who are well categorised and filtered, and the database is well updated. Also, it has a better UI with end to end hiring requirement management, that helps to make hiring faster and smarter. The UX though is a bit laggy, which can be improved
Read full review
PeopleFluent
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
LinkedIn
  • Positive impact. The tool has helped us in finding quality candidates for our hard to fill positions!
  • Helps in “pipelining” even after we fill a position, we make a folder of prospective candidates that we find through the platform. This list is then revisited once we have additional positions!
  • Outreach to global candidates. We have an office in Spain and we have found so many qualified candidates on the platform to fill those positions!
Read full review
PeopleFluent
  • I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
  • I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.
Read full review
ScreenShots

PeopleFluent Screenshots

Screenshot of PeopleFluent Talent Management DashboardScreenshot of Recruiting DashboardScreenshot of Compensation DashboardScreenshot of Performance DashboardScreenshot of Analytics Dashboard