5 Reviews and Ratings
16 Reviews and Ratings
No answers on this topic
Best suited to conduct remote interviews that are moderated and facilitated by the interviewer/researcher. Not the best if you want to do it unmoderated, there are much more sophisticated tools out there. Unfortunately, for a design research team that does both these kids of research, it can be hard to get budgets to get two softwares and hence the Unmoderated Feature can seem super undercooked and doesn’t really do the job. Otherwise it’s a great toolIncentivized
If we could select 0/10 we would... We would not recommend anyone using this product as it excludes a very important user group, disabled users. If you use this product you will be failing ADA and WCAG 2.1 (EU Directive for public sector websites and mobile apps). In my opinion, you will be vulnerable to lawsuits.
Organising interviews for mobile devicesObserver links so people can watch without interrupting the sessionVideo transcriptionsIncentivized
Continuous feedback such as CSAT or NPS score.Monitors feedback trends on recurring surveys through analytics dashboard.In context, in the moment data rather than during a follow up survey.Incentivized
Unmoderated interviews is still under cooked as a featureThe process of how participants have to download an app to start an interview is a large friction point for usIncentivized
Styling and positioning of the 'Feedback' button could be improved with more options provided. Right now it seems very basic.Triggered surveys and popups would also benefit for more styling and control over how the survey is presented to users. Sometimes it can be hard to match your brand to the out-of-box options available. I've seen more flexible versions of this in other providers.Notifications of negative feedback (delivered via email) could be improved. We like to try and take immediate action and the notifications haven't always made this possible. I'd also like to see more notification options added to triggered campaigns and surveys.Incentivized
The interface to configure the questionary is quite easy to use. It helps to give autonomy to marketing teams. Once the initial setup is made (integrating a basic javascript code on your website), you can easily deploy any questionary on any page of your website. Usabilla is a very flexible tool overall.Incentivized
If we could select 0/10 we would... If Usabilla were to fix their accessibility issues we would consider keeping our subscription to them, but as it stands this does not seem possible as Usabilla does not seem interested in making the platform accessible.
Zoom was way more expensive and it o is designed to other things apart from just running qualitative interviews. It also requires a different kind of approval and different approval processes to go through when trying to get it simply for qualitative research purposes. Lookback records, scribes, helps observe and provides a sentiment check as well in the price that it doesIncentivized
I have Hotjar, Sprig, and Usabilla in my workplace. Usabilla unfortunately has the most limited feature set of the 3 options. The difficulty of administering a Usabilla survey on mobile is a big blocker for my projects. Sprig and Hotjar both allow mobile and allow video recordings (either of a user's screen or a user's webcam for impromptu interviews).Incentivized
It allows stakeholder engagement and that’sa huge plus especially if it’s happening discretely in the background and theyre not interrupting the interviewIncentivized
Positive - gave us more insight into our user's journey post purchase.Positive - let us know what problems our users were having with our account portal through moment of truth surveys.Positive - gave us numbers to show to leadership that quantified the digital customer experience.Incentivized