Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) is a user research platform used to test digital products with real users and gain insights into their audience. Its tools and features help Lyssna to optimize users' designs and create more engaging user-friendly experiences. Lyssna is a research platform, offering a broad range of testing features including: Five Second Testing - Used to quickly test the effectiveness of landing pages, messaging and designs by showing users a…
$0
per month (3 seats included)
MaritzCX
Score7 out of 10
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pricing
Lyssna
MaritzCX
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
3 seats included
Growth
$199
per month 5 seats included
Enterprise
Contact Sales
custom seats
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lyssna
MaritzCX
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount available for annual plan. Panel responses are priced seperately.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Lyssna
MaritzCX
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Lyssna and MaritzCX
Feature
Lyssna
-
Ratings
MaritzCX
6.0
1 Ratings
29% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Lyssna and MaritzCX
Feature
Lyssna
-
Ratings
MaritzCX
8.0
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Lyssna and MaritzCX
Feature
Lyssna
-
Ratings
MaritzCX
7.0
1 Ratings
18% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Lyssna and MaritzCX
Feature
Lyssna
-
Ratings
MaritzCX
6.8
1 Ratings
18% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Lyssna and MaritzCX
Feature
Lyssna
-
Ratings
MaritzCX
7.0
1 Ratings
21% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Lyssna and MaritzCX
UsabilityHub is well suited for remote unmoderated testing. Responses are captured very quickly and live updates allow the user to keep track of how the test is performing. The types of testing that make the most sense to use on UsabilityHub are preference test, first click test, navigational, and design surveys. It is less appropriate for one-on-one testing and lengthy questionnaires.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think MaritzCX was a great option for internal and external surveys. I used it for feedback from clients who attended events. It gave me a clean report to show executive leadership about anything from venue, parking, food, and entertainment. It worked for event registration to save money using only one software. I used it for clients to sign up for events. Less of a clean report but works.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Add additional demographic sorting options for the audience to better meet the needs of B2B users - for example include industry type, functional area, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Due to its simplicity and design it is really easy to navigate. You can clearly understand which sections you have completed and which are still left to be done. It is also really easy to change ordering of content etc, which I have found hasn’t been an option in other tools which means it is a really lengthy task of rewriting all of the tasks or questions to get them in the correct order that is desired.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
UsabilityHub provides very fast, short responses to specific questions about a static image of a website. This is useful for checking what is most prominent on a page, what they would click on, what they see/read within the first 5 seconds of landing etc. WhatUsersDo is a broader tool, that records the screen and audio as a user navigates the website. You can set tasks and ask questions, but it much more about the user journey experience and their opinion, rather than testing a particular feature. Feedback also takes a bit longer. Hotjar is a combination of both, its a screen recording which helps you to see where users click and move to, but there is no audio or text feedback, just heatmaps/click maps for watching user behaviour.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info