Lyssna vs. Respondent.io

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lyssna
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) is a user research platform used to test digital products with real users and gain insights into their audience. Its tools and features help Lyssna to optimize users' designs and create more engaging user-friendly experiences. Lyssna is a research platform, offering a broad range of testing features including: Five Second Testing - Used to quickly test the effectiveness of landing pages, messaging and designs by showing users a…
$0
per month per seat
Respondent.io
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Respondent.io is a marketplace for sourcing business professionals for in-depth research interviews, or used to recruit B2B and B2C research participants for studies, as well as screen, schedule & pay research participants.
$39
per B2C credit
Pricing
LyssnaRespondent.io
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
3 seats included
Starter
$99
per month 5 seats included
Growth
$199
per month 15 seats included
Enterprise
Contact Sales
custom seats
Pay As You Go - B2C
$39
billed at completed research per B2C credit
Pay As You Go - B2B
$65
billed at research completion per B2B credit
Basic - B2C
$1,980
per year 60 B2C credits per year
Basic - B2B
$3,300
per year 60 B2B credits per year
Advanced - B2C
$3,600
per year 150 B2C credits per year
Advanced - B2B
$6,000
per year 150 B2B credits per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LyssnaRespondent.io
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual plan. Panel responses are priced seperately.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LyssnaRespondent.io
Features
LyssnaRespondent.io
Market Research
Comparison of Market Research features of Product A and Product B
Lyssna
-
Ratings
Respondent.io
9.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Consumer Feedback00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LyssnaRespondent.io
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.5 out of 10
Alchemer
Alchemer
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
Alchemer
Alchemer
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
Alchemer
Alchemer
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LyssnaRespondent.io
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(5 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LyssnaRespondent.io
Likelihood to Recommend
Lyssna
UsabilityHub is well suited for remote unmoderated testing. Responses are captured very quickly and live updates allow the user to keep track of how the test is performing. The types of testing that make the most sense to use on UsabilityHub are preference test, first click test, navigational, and design surveys. It is less appropriate for one-on-one testing and lengthy questionnaires.
Read full review
Respondent Inc
It is great for participant recruitment on go-pay basis. Perfect for smaller companies and UX teams. but larger companies and teams might want to look into other solutions that could be used at scale
Read full review
Pros
Lyssna
  • Rapid user feedback
  • Demographic targeting
  • Well presented results
  • Easy to use
  • Relatively inexpensive
Read full review
Respondent Inc
  • Recruitment
  • Option to cherry pick participants
  • Easy to use
Read full review
Cons
Lyssna
  • Add additional demographic sorting options for the audience to better meet the needs of B2B users - for example include industry type, functional area, etc.
  • Bring back the navigation test type
  • Add additional test types
Read full review
Respondent Inc
  • Adding customer meeting links
  • custom consent
Read full review
Usability
Lyssna
Due to its simplicity and design it is really easy to navigate. You can clearly understand which sections you have completed and which are still left to be done. It is also really easy to change ordering of content etc, which I have found hasn’t been an option in other tools which means it is a really lengthy task of rewriting all of the tasks or questions to get them in the correct order that is desired.
Read full review
Respondent Inc
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Lyssna
UsabilityHub provides very fast, short responses to specific questions about a static image of a website. This is useful for checking what is most prominent on a page, what they would click on, what they see/read within the first 5 seconds of landing etc. WhatUsersDo is a broader tool, that records the screen and audio as a user navigates the website. You can set tasks and ask questions, but it much more about the user journey experience and their opinion, rather than testing a particular feature. Feedback also takes a bit longer. Hotjar is a combination of both, its a screen recording which helps you to see where users click and move to, but there is no audio or text feedback, just heatmaps/click maps for watching user behaviour.
Read full review
Respondent Inc
We use Respondent.io as a supplementary tool on a go-pay basis. It offers us another channel to recruit participants to explore different financial topics.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Lyssna
  • Increase in testing frequency per quarter.
  • Increase in approved projects for developments.
  • Few reverts per project.
Read full review
Respondent Inc
  • Time to market
  • Better user experience
  • Product market fit
Read full review
ScreenShots

Lyssna Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of