M‑Files vs. NirvaShare
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
M‑Files | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | M-Files delivers Context-First Document Management with a metadata-driven architecture that improves productivity across the document lifecycle. By linking documents to the people, processes, clients, and projects that give them meaning, M-Files creates a unified environment that strengthens governance. | N/A |
NirvaShare | N/A | N/A | Enterprise Secure File Sharing of Cloud Storage such as AWS S3, Azure, Wasabi, Digital Ocean Space, MinIO, and Linode. Securely share and collaborate any folder or file with external identities such as customers, partners, vendors, etc with security and fine access control including internal identities like employees. Supports variety of authentication options such as Federated SSO (SAML2), Basic, Form and OTP based. Integrates with identity providers like GSuite, Active Directory,… | N/A |
| M‑Files | NirvaShare | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pricing starts as low as $50/month and varies based on the complexity and size, please contact us for more details. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| M‑Files | NirvaShare | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
93% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| M‑Files | NirvaShare | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | pdfFiller Score9 out of 10 | Dropbox DocSend Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | Dropbox DocSend Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| M‑Files | NirvaShare | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.9 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.9 | - |
| Usability | 8.2 | - |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Online Training | 9.1 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 | - |
| Configurability | 9.6 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 7.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 7.0 | - |
| M‑Files | NirvaShare | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| In-Person Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | M‑Files Screenshots | NirvaShare Screenshots |












