Zelta vs. TrueContext

Zelta is a good tool for companies currently utilizing multiple software platforms to create and monitor clinical trial information. Due to the price, it is best suited for large pharmaceutical manufacturers with active pipelines and high R&D spend. Zelta's value is more limited to smaller, more focused companies.

Incentivized

Prontoforms is suited for complicated business needs that are able to integrate seamlessly into one of the out-of-the-box solutions available. For simple recording to a spreadsheet, pdf, word document, database, etc. without any additional integrations, better (and in some cases free) solutions may work. For custom integrations, cost and effort may get expensive.

Incentivized

• It is highly customizable and easy to program.
• There is a wide variety of data that can be collected from IRB/site information to clinical data.
• Zelta provides comprehensive edit language to program for accurate results.
• Page dynamics are very useful when including or hiding certain data questions.

Incentivized

• Conditional logic
• Linking to data sources
• Integration to Salesforce and ServiceMax

Incentivized

• We cannot have multiple study accesses for a study in the studies supported by Zelta. eg. Coder and Data manager.
• Though all the study-build related errors are flagged on the study-build page, some errors like incorrect dynamics applied, which eventually affects the subject PDF extraction, reports, etc.
• When the study is imported from another Zelta studies, certain attributes remain running in the background even if it seems to be disabled.

Incentivized

• Limitations to form formatting
• Need more data source integrations
• All of the different components need to synchronize automatically and more often.

Incentivized

We are satisfied from our experience with Zelta by Merative, the close collaboration we have with the Zelta team is also something we value. We plan to use Zelta for a long time

Incentivized

Zelta has many different functionalities as well as modules that can be used depending on what the sponsor wants. I like that they are optional so that when building a study, you can give the sponsor options if they want them or not. Many of the optional models I like to use (Training Tracking for example) as they make tracking Site training so much easier than sending training forms out.

Incentivized

As Prontoforms markets itself as a low code, user-friendly drag and drop solution, it definitely excels in the area of user experience. While those who are more on the technical side will appreciate the standard options available as part of its custom integration tools. The learning curve has never been an issue.

Incentivized

available when needed

Incentivized

some audit reports are difficult to download and take time subject pdf also takes some time to download

Incentivized

Our organization has been using both Zelta and in-house applications. The main considerations on which one to use for a particular study is time to get the databases running, cost, and ease of use. For some studies, the time and cost of using Zelta are negative factors, and an in-house system is selected.

The customer support for pronto forms was great for me in the only instance that I have had to use it. I called the phone number for ProntoForms customer support, they were quick with the correct answer for me and very reassuring.

Incentivized

very efficient self training

Incentivized

again not sure about it, I wasn't part of our organization yet

Incentivized

It was easier to understand the usability of the software [Zelta]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to work with team members everywhere making clinical trials more efficient.

Incentivized

We looked for versatility of product and cost effectiveness when trying to choose vendors. Even though the product can be set up by the user or administrator, the more complex parts of the form required help to be done right. Vendors needed to be able to offer their services to get this done in a timely fashion. ProntoForms hit all the marks. We looked at other vendors and they just couldn't replicate or form closely enough.

Incentivized

• Time savings regarding how long it takes to make an EDC Live.
• Reduced EDC Go Live time by at least half (from 60 days to 30).
• Was able to take an EDC live in 14 days on a few occasions.
• Seamless RTSM IRT integration without adding time to Go Live.

Incentivized

• Return on Investment is immediate and possible from the first submission.
• Saved us hours when it came to implementing forms on websites

Incentivized