Based in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.
$24,000
per year
Think ABM
Score9.1 out of 10
N/A
Think ABM leverages Sales Nitro, their proprietary AI engine, to apply Intent data over their first-party data. Think ABM's selling feature is psychographics. Sales Nitro provides key insights into the prospects' intent, interests, and psychographics enabling the building of personalized nurture campaigns or tailored outreach based on the buyer's personality and interests. Offerings: 1. Lead Gen 2. Media Campaigns 3. Event Registrations 4. Channel Solutions 5. Data
Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
In the duration of our campaign, any requests that we made never received any pushback. Whether this was to change reporting types or creative material, Mark and Brian were able to get them implemented with ease. They made any changes swiftly and always kept a close eye on our campaign to ensure that our objectives were being met. We had weekly meetings to discuss campaign performance and they always had constructive suggestions to offer on how we can keep improving the campaign. Each meeting was very productive in discussing next steps - it was a breath of fresh air to have a team that was so knowledgeable about what they do, and truly wanted to help our campaign succeed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you don't have a large budget and audience it's hard to meaningfully optimize. If I have 4 ad creatives, to 2 audience groups on FB and LinkedIn, that creates 16 experiments, each of which needs an ample enough budget, say $40/day, that's now $640 per day or $19K per month.
Limited ability to edit ads after they've been launched. You usually have to stop the ad, clone it, and launch a new campaign.
Can't add new ads to existing campaigns which limits the ability to optimize. If I start an MD campaign with 4 ads, and in a few weeks we see that one is working well and the other 2 are not performing, I can pause those (or it can autopause by rules), but I can't add 2 more new creatives to the mix against the high performer. I'd have to either stop the high performer, and recreate it in a new campaign (losing likes and comments), OR - leave the high performer in the first campaign, and create. a second campaign with the new ones, which will only optimize against each other.
Limited to a single conversion event on a landing page. I'm not able to choose either a Demo Request OR a Sign-Up conversion, I can only choose one.
Google search ads are doable but aren't necessarily more feature-rich or easy-to use than native, so there's no value added to doing it through Metadata in my opinion aside from unifying ad reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't want to pay for features we weren't going to use.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Compared with other vendors, the customer experience that you get with Think ABM is vastly different from other vendors. It's not a simple "plug and play" kind of campaign where you hear from the vendor at the end of the campaign, or at the end of every month where you get a report that just lists your CTR. Not only that, they curate their own TAL to go in tandem with your own list, so that you are able to reach your targeted accounts while increasing your exposure to other companies as well which is great from an awareness standpoint. Their offerings in awareness also consisted of native, display, video, and OTT/CTV - differing from just your traditional display/native options. These can also be paired with lead gen to fully optimize on your ROI.
Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
