Microsoft Access vs. MonetDB

Microsoft Access can be easily implemented with training. It doesn't require expert level skill for basic reporting functions - but can be scaled to a complex database with sophisticated users. Its appropriate to consider if excel needs to be used to create reports, or if there are data entry needs - with corresponding reports.

Incentivized

I think for what we use it for, mainly scheduling, forecast and to compare against payroll, it works well. I think there are some other things that could be added to it to use, like more expansive ways to use the forecasting tool and an easier way to pull previous data from prior years. This would help making the forecast for scheduling in the future.

Incentivized

• Generates information about department events, services, orders, etc. quickly and in report form.
• Easy to design forms and reports with drag and drop components. You don't need to know coding.
• The ability to link tables and queries to get all the info needed for forms and reports
• Forms and reports are easy to customize and edit.
• Easily report your data grouped and sorted by any field

Incentivized

• It is easy to use.
• You are able to input lots of data and it understands and populates information.
• Able to change settings on the fly to use with your needs.

Incentivized

• Generally high learning curve for new users. Especially if they are not comfortable with technology.
• Desktop only program; not available in web-format like other O365 products
• Fewer experienced users, means it's a lot of self-teaching and troubleshooting when you run into an issue

Incentivized

• This is an open source software so there are obvious drawbacks, the biggest of which is a lack of documentation.
• MonetDB does not seem to be well known outside of the academic environment so there is less information when you are searching for answers of any type.
• I'd like to see more use cases and/or best practices so that commercial companies like ours can optimally use all of its highly performant features.
• The code is written in C/C++ and this can be negative if you are a mainly java-shop and need UDF - User Defined Function.

Incentivized

I and the rest of my team will renew our Microsoft Access in the future because we use and maintain many different applications and databases created using Microsoft Access so we will need to maintain them in the future. Additionally, it is a standard at our place of work so it is at $0 cost to us to use. Another reason for renewing Microsoft Access is that we just don' t have the resources needed to extend into a network of users so we need to remain a single-desktop application at this time.

Microsoft Access is easy to use. It is compatible with spreadsheets. It is a very good data management tool. There is scope to save a large amount of data in one place. For using this database, one does not need much training, can be shared among multiple users. This database has to sort and filtering features which seem to be very useful.

Incentivized

I don't think the program has ever failed me. It is one of those programs where there is always a solution if you know where to look.

Incentivized

While I have never contacted Microsoft directly for product support, for some reason there's a real prejudice against MS Access among most IT support professionals. They are usually discouraging when it comes to using MS Access. Most of this is due to their lack of understanding of MS Access and how it can improve one's productivity. If Microsoft invested more resources towards enhancing and promoting the use of MS Access then maybe things would be different.

Incentivized

there is no key idea, since it is easy to implement Microsoft Access

Microsoft Access is used independently of Microsoft's Office suite (also in use) at our company - the usual applications: Word, Excel, Outlook, etc. and does not really overlap. Microsoft Access was selected as a simple, functional inventory database based on ease of data entry, search functionality and avoiding the need for a separate ERP module.

Incentivized

There is a plethora of choices when it comes to NoSQL and columnar based databases. We use not one but sometimes 2 or 3 of them to carry out a specific purpose. We chose MonetDB because our engineering team enjoys working with open source software and appreciates its simplicity although becoming familiar with it did take time. I would not deploy MonetDB to production but it's a great backup option.

Incentivized

• Microsoft Access is very low in cost as compared to its competitors and provides value for money spent.
• Comes with Office Suite for your whole organization. Easy to install and use.
• Many people had to shift to Windows in order to use those as there is no Mac version.

Incentivized

• If you are familiar with a general database concept and played with open source products before then MonetDB will give you immediate return in terms of productivity since developers can quickly develop and verify their test cases involving back-end database with a large sample data set.
• There is a stiff learning curve due to lack of documentation and sparse information available on the internet.
• Overall experience has been positive since MonetDB gives you another option when it comes to building out a data warehouse.

Incentivized